Archaeologists claim the Ukrainian pyramids predate those in Giza
It is claimed that the monuments have been uncovered in the east of the country and that they predate the pyramids in Egypt. But the claim that there is evidence of pyramids is being disputed. The prestigious Academy of Sciences has sent its own expert to the dig. It believes that this could be the Ukrainian version of Stonehenge.
This could be one of the most exciting archaeological discoveries in recent years.
3 responses so far ↓
mark // October 12, 2006 at 12:40 am
pc kooks are scared to death that euros had pyramids first.
truth hurts i guess
dobropet // December 10, 2007 at 5:49 pm
This is only if the pyramids at Giza are considered to have been built after all the others in the area had been built, when in fact the Giza pyramids were actually built well before anyother pyramid like structure had been built.
dobropet // December 11, 2007 at 10:42 pm
From the book “The Wars Of Gods And Men, chapter 7: When The Earth Was Divided, pg. 135-137; By suggesting that the great pyramids of Giza were built not by Pharoahs but by the Anunnaki millenia earlier, we of course contradict long-held theories concerning these pyramids. The theory of nineteeth-century Egyptologists, that the Egyptian pyramids, including the unique three at Giza, were erected by a succession of Pharoahs as grandiose tombs for themselves, has long been disproven: not one of them was found to contain the body of the Pharaoh who was their known or presumed builder. Accordingly, the Great Pyramid of Giza was supposed to have been built by Khufu(Cheops), its twin by a successor named Chefra(Chephren), and the third, small one by a third successor, Menkara(Mycerinus)–all kings of the sixth dynasty. The Sphinx, the same Egyptologists presume, must have been built by Chephren, because it is situated next to a causeway leading to the Second Pyramid. For a while it was believed that proof had been found in the smallest one of the three pyramids of Giza and the identity of the Pharaoh who built it established. The credit for this was cliamed by a Colonel Howard Vyse and his two assistants, who claimed to have discovered within the pyramid the coffin and the mummified remains of the Pharaoh Menkara. The fact, however–known to scholars for some time know but for some reason still hardly publicized–is that neither the wooden coffin nor the skeletal remains were authentic. Someone–undoubtedly that Colonel Vyse and his cronies–had brought into the pyramid a coffin dating from about 2,000 years after Menkara had lived, and bones from the even much later Christian times, and put the two together in an unabashed archaeological fraud. The current theories regarding the pyramids’ builders are anchored to an even greater extent on the discovery of the name Khufu inscribed in hieroglyphics within a long sealed compartment within the Great Pyramid and thus apparently establishing the identity of its builder. Unnoticed has gone the fact that the discoverer of that inscription was the same Colonel Vyse and his assistants(the year was 1837). In “The Stairway To Heaven” we have put together substantial evidence to show that the inscription was a forgery, perpetrated by its “discoverers.” At the end of 1983, a reader of that book came forward to provide us with family records showing that his great-grandfather, a master mason named Humphries Brewer, who was engaged by Vyse to help use gunpowder to blast his way inside the pyramid, was an ‘eyewitness to the forgery’ and, having objected to the deed, was expelled from the site and forced to leave Egypt altogether! In ‘The Stairway To Heaven’ we have shown that Khufu could not have been the builder of the Great Pyramid because he had already referred to it as existing in his time in a stela he had erected near the pyramids; even the Sphinx, supposedly erected by the next-after successor of Khufu, is mentioned in that inscription.