<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Study: No Boeing 757 Hit the Pentagon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2007/06/23/new-study-no-boeing-757-hit-the-pentagon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2007/06/23/new-study-no-boeing-757-hit-the-pentagon/</link>
	<description>Independent Post-9/11 News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 03:54:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon Paul</title>
		<link>http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2007/06/23/new-study-no-boeing-757-hit-the-pentagon/#comment-53508</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 12:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2007/06/23/new-study-no-boeing-757-hit-the-pentagon/#comment-53508</guid>
		<description>Don,

These are reasonable question for someone who just landed on earth from a distant star, if you get my drift.

For questions one and two:  

Before being concerned about those answers one has a mountain of readily available information to go through regarding the plain physical reasoning and visual evidence, like the photos of the Pentagon wall right after the impact before the upper structre of the wall collapsed.

As for why there was a cover up:  

I&#039;m pretty sure that intentionaly flying an airplane into a building is a crime.

Peace,
Jon Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don,</p>
<p>These are reasonable question for someone who just landed on earth from a distant star, if you get my drift.</p>
<p>For questions one and two:  </p>
<p>Before being concerned about those answers one has a mountain of readily available information to go through regarding the plain physical reasoning and visual evidence, like the photos of the Pentagon wall right after the impact before the upper structre of the wall collapsed.</p>
<p>As for why there was a cover up:  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure that intentionaly flying an airplane into a building is a crime.</p>
<p>Peace,<br />
Jon Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2007/06/23/new-study-no-boeing-757-hit-the-pentagon/#comment-29963</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 03:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2007/06/23/new-study-no-boeing-757-hit-the-pentagon/#comment-29963</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m totally unfamiliar with this theory, so I need some basic stuff cleared up.

What happened to the plane the government claims hit the Pentagon?
And what happened to the people who were supposed to be in it?

What is the motive for the coverup?

Thanks,

Don</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m totally unfamiliar with this theory, so I need some basic stuff cleared up.</p>
<p>What happened to the plane the government claims hit the Pentagon?<br />
And what happened to the people who were supposed to be in it?</p>
<p>What is the motive for the coverup?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Don</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
