Alzheimer’s ID chips stir emotions, fears

Clothing. Razor blades. Pets. Cattle. Fish. Alzheimer’s patients. Prisoners. Pedophiles. Soldiers. Employees. Children…and the list goes on. One by one, group by group, the entire planet, every animate and inanimate object is to be RFID microchipped according to the plans of the globalist elites. And how did all this get started? Well, it has been a plan in the making for decades going back to the 30’s at least and was mimicked by Herr Hitler with the help of IBM who together systematized the tracking of concentration camp prisoners using the first punch-card computer system and crude tattoo numbers. And by the 1960’s, the CIA was already experimenting with crude brainchip technology. In 1969, a leading researcher by the name of Dr. Jose Delgado proclaimed in his book “Physical Control of the Mind, Toward a Psychocivilized Society”:

“The individual may think that the most important reality is his own existence, but this is only his personal point of view. This lacks historical perspective. Man does NOT HAVE THE RIGHT to develop his own mind. This kind of liberal orientation has great appeal. We must ELECTRICALLY CONTROL THE BRAIN. Some day armies and generals will be controlled by electric stimulation of the brain.”

And THAT is where all this is leading and has been leading for a very long time. All they needed was a “Pearl Harbor event” to get people to embrace it and that is what they got because they staged it and the stupid idiots out there who still believe it was Arab terrorists need to wake the hell up.

Prior to 9/11, if you even breathed a word about human microchip implants, people would look at you like you were a mental case. Oh, but immediately after 9/11, sure it suddenly became a great idea. Like so many New World Order programs, people will deny it exists one day, and then the very next day will be signing up for it and bleating and rationalizing how wonderful it is. Such is the extent of the mind-control in this Matrix-like society of ours. Oh yeah, and guess what corporation is running the microchipping agenda today…Verichip, you guessed it, an IBM subsidiary. What a shock.

It’s time for people to grow up, realize what is really happening here and put an absolute halt to it now before it’s too late.

PW

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Alzheimer’s ID chips stir emotions, fears 

Orlando Sentinel | Jun 26, 2007

It looks deceptively familiar. The patient rolls up his sleeve, the doctor sticks a needle into his arm, and soon it’s all over. But this is no routine vaccination. Instead, the patient has been injected with a fleck of silicon that will uniquely identify him when zapped with radio waves. Now, nearly three years after their use was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, implantable radio frequency identification (RFID) chips are the focus of a new controversy.

The battle lines are being drawn in a quiet corner of West Palm Beach. Last month, some 30 protesters held an interfaith prayer vigil outside Alzheimer’s Community Care, a day-care facility for people with dementia. At issue is the facility’s plan to implant 200 patients with microchips manufactured and donated by VeriChip of nearby Delray Beach. When scanned, the chip reveals a unique ID number, which when entered into a password-protected database gives access to medical information about its owner.

If the plan goes ahead, it will be the first time the technology has been tried on a group of people with a specific mental impairment. The forgetfulness that comes with Alzheimer’s can make it impossible for people with the condition to pass on vital information when faced with a medical emergency, which is why advocates are keen to make use of RFID chips with this group.

“If for whatever reason — an automobile accident or hurricane — the person becomes separated from their loved one, they are totally, totally helpless. They can’t share what medically is wrong with them,” says Mary Barnes of Alzheimer’s Community Care. “This could be a safety net.”

Privacy advocates say that it is precisely this helplessness that makes the proposed use of the tags unacceptable. “This is a community that is not in a position to give fully informed consent or to say no,” says Katherine Albrecht, of CASPIAN, a Florida-based consumer rights organization. “The nature of the disease is that they can’t fully understand.”

Albrecht would rather see a chip implanted in a bracelet.

But Barnes says a bracelet would not be nearly as useful. People might remove it if it got uncomfortable, especially those with Alzheimer’s, who might not understand why they should wear it.

Another criticism of bracelets: They could label people as mentally ill, whereas an implanted chip is much less obvious.

Albrecht likens “the violent and invasive act” of implanting a chip in someone without the ability to consent to the act of rape. Others agree with the sentiment, if not the comparison.

“This is by definition a way of doing something that denies a person control,” says Lee Tien, of the Electronic Frontier Foundation in San Francisco. “If that doesn’t strike at the heart of human dignity, I don’t know what does.”