Aftermath News

CIA Analyst Discusses Possible Cheney 9/11 Stand-down Order

August 15, 2007 · 8 Comments

bush-911-jetfuel-wtc-laff

“You need to have on the payroll some very unsavoury characters.”

- Vice President Dick Cheney on NBC’s “Meet the Press” host, Tim Russert. – Monday, September 17, 2001

CIA Analyst Discusses Possible Cheney 9/11 Stand-down Order.

Retired CIA Analyst Ray McGovern discusses the possibility of vice president Cheney issuing a stand-down order that allowed the 9/11 attacks to succeed, on a national talk radio program.

. . .

Mineta and the secret orders of Cheney

In 2003, Former Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta testified before the 9/11 Commission:

Mineta: “During the time that the airplane was coming into the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President…the plane is 50 miles out…the plane is 30 miles out….and when it got down to the plane is 10 miles out, the young man also said to the vice president “do the orders still stand?” And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said “Of course the orders still stand, have you heard anything to the contrary!??”

Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory often claim that Mineta was referring to United 93 and not to unidentified plane coming towards Washington D.C. before the explosion at the Pentagon.

. . .

Norman Mineta Confirms That Dick Cheney Ordered Stand Down on 9/11
Norman Mineta made it clear to reporters– who verified his quotes in written text alongside him– that Mineta was indeed talking about a stand down order not to shoot down hijacked aircraft headed for the Pentagon.

. . .

Related

Former Transportation Secretary Disputes 9/11 Commission Report Timetable for Dick Cheney and Reveals Lynn Cheney Was Also in PEOC Bunker Before Attack

. . .

NORAD Stand Down and Wargames
Why didn’t NORAD fulfil its standard operating procedure and intercept the planes? Were NORAD intentionally confused by the wargames taking place on the morning of 9/11 or were they ordered to stand down?

. . .

Noam Chomsky – Controlled Asset Of The New World Order

Noam Chomsky says, “Even if it were true, who cares?” He goes onto say that even if it were true that JFK was murdered by the government, “Who knows? And who cares? I mean plenty of people get killed all the time.”

“The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum.”

- Noam Chomsky

Noam Chomsky the Establishment’s Left Gatekeeper Misdirecting You Away from Real Issues

Should Noam Chomsky reset his Compass?
Although Chomsky co-wrote a book, called “Manufacturing Consent,” about how the Establishment shapes the opinion of the masses, he didn’t think about using that same kind of keen analysis in this book. In particular, with respect to 9/11, neither here nor in his earlier book, entitled, “9/11,” did Chomsky touch on the powerful idea that the power brokers both cause and interpret what’s going on in a way that supports their agenda. This leads me to wonder: Was 9/11, too, manufactured? Did the Bush-Cheney Gang know it was coming and let it happen? Or, was it Machiavellian plot put into play by sinister intelligence agencies looking for a pretext to set the U.S. up to demonize Islam, attack Iraq and turn this country into a police state? Chomsky declines to open up that kind of necessary inquiry.

Noam Chomsky and the Pro-Israel Lobby
Chomsky frequently criticized the half-hearted criticism by liberals of US foreign policy, yet he nowhere raises a single peep about the absolute silence of Jewish progressives about the major role of the Lobby in promoting the invasion of Iraq. At no point does he engage in debate or criticism of the scores of Israel First academic supporters of war with Iraq, Iran or Syria. Instead his criticism of the war revolves around the role of Party leaders, the Bush Administration etc… without any attempt to understand the organized basis and ideological mentors of the militarists. Chomsky totally ignores the disinformation office set up in the Pentagon by ultra Zionist Douglas Feith – the so-called ‘Office of Special Plans’ – run by fellow ZionCon Abram Shumsky to channel bogus “data” to the White House – bypassing and discrediting CIA and military intelligence which contradicted their disinformation. Non-Zionist specialist in the Pentagon’s Middle East office Colonel Karen Kwiatkowski described in great detail the easy and constant flow of Mossad and Israeli military officers in and out of Feith’s office, while critical US experts were virtually barred.

Noam Chomsky, Closet Capitalist
Chomsky invests in oil companies, military contractors and pharmaceuticals

Chomsky’s marketing efforts shortly after Sept. 11 give new meaning to the term “war profiteer.” In the days after the tragedy, he raised his speaking fee from US$9,000 to US$12,000 because he was suddenly in greater demand. He also cashed in by producing another instant book. Seven Stories Press, a small publisher, pulled together interviews conducted via e-mail that Chomsky gave in the three weeks following the attack on the Twin Towers and rushed the book to press. His controversial views were hot, particularly overseas. By early December 2001, the publisher had sold the foreign rights in 19 different languages. The book made the best-seller list in the United States, Canada, Germany, India, Italy, Japan and New Zealand. It is safe to assume that he netted hundreds of thousands of dollars from this book alone. Chomsky, for all of his moral dudgeon against American corporations, finds that they make a pretty good investment. When he made investment decisions for his retirement plan at MIT, he chose not to go with a money market fund or even a government bond fund. Instead, he threw the money into blue chips and invested in the TIAA-CREF stock fund. A look at the stock fund portfolio quickly reveals that it invests in all sorts of businesses that Chomsky says he finds abhorrent: oil companies, military contractors, pharmaceuticals, you name it.

Noam Chomsky – Controlled Asset Of The New World Order
“Since 9-11, he has steadfastly refused to discuss the evidence of government complicity and prior knowledge. Furthermore, he claims that the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Bilderberg Committee, and Trilateral Commission are “nothing organizations.” When critiquing poverty, he never mentions the Federal Reserve and their role in manipulating the cycle of debt. Similarly, he claims the CIA was never a rogue organization and is an innocent scapegoat; that JFK was killed by the lone assassin Lee Harvey Oswald; that the obvious vote fraud in 2004 did not occur…”

Rethinking Noam Chomsky
These articles by Michael Morrissey, Bob Feldman, Daniel Abrahamson, and Benjamin Merhav among others, may get you thinking twice about Noam Chomsky and similar nationally touted “critics” of the government. Chomsky, in particular, is thought of as the creme-de-la-creme of anti-government muckrakers while he simultaneously embraces every facet of the government’s cover story when it comes to who was responsible for killing JFK, or the origin of AIDS, or the Vietnam War turn-around following the JFK assassination, or 9-11. Despite appearances to the contrary, Chomsky sides with the government’s version of events with virtually every major ‘conspiracy’ scandal to emerge in the past 45 years.

A case study:Noam Chomsky and JFK

Noam Chomsky:’Left Wing’ Establishment Shill

Noam Chomky Promotes Bogus 9/11 – JFK Theories

Michael Moore Owns Halliburton Stock
He’s right. He doesn’t own a single share. He owns tens of thousands of shares – including nearly 2,000 shares of Boeing, nearly 1,000 of Sonoco, more than 4,000 of Best Foods, more than 3,000 of Eli Lilly, more than 8,000 of Bank One and more than 2,000 of Halliburton, the company most vilified by Moore in “Fahrenheit 9/11.” Noam Chomsky has made a reputation for calling America a police state and branding the Pentagon “the most hideous institution on earth,” yet his entire academic career, writes Schweizer, has been subsidized by the U.S. military.

Left Gate Keepers
Foundation Funding and the Left Media Gatekeepers

Categories: Cover-ups · Crime & Corruption · Operation 9/11 · Terror Psyops

8 responses so far ↓

  • xoc // August 16, 2007 at 12:53 am

    Chomsky makes good points, and to call him a ‘controlled asset of the new world order’ is ludicrous. Even so, there are still many unanswered questions about 9-11 that should be answered. To get to the truth you need to stay objective, stay open to ALL possibilities, and calmly examine the evidence. The Mineta/Cheney line of enquiry clearly needs to be fully explored.

  • Ishereal // August 16, 2007 at 1:59 am

    Thought Chompsky was a freedom fighter!

  • pjwalker911 // August 16, 2007 at 4:35 am

    No, he isn’t a hero. Not to me anyway. Chomsky’s a controlled-opposition Left-gatekeeper, a Marxist and a globalist who won’t bite the elite hand that feeds him, just as Lenin and Stalin were funded by the same Wall Street elites. He dismisses concerns about the CFR, Bilderberg etc drawing attention away from the banking powers of the Federal Reserve that fund the wars and ships in the drugs and instead focuses on the American concept itself as the the evil in the world. He wants to get rid of all the guns, get rid of national sovereignty and is in favor of world government and supports the global warming hoax.

    He covers up 9/11 supporting the official story and regarding any possible conspiracy says, “Even if it were true, who cares?” Apparently, even if he admitted government complicity in 9/11, he thinks it would be a side issue not worth looking at. He goes on to say that even if it were true that JFK was murdered by the government, “Who cares? I mean plenty of people get killed all the time.”

    I don’t hear him complaining about the North American Union, the Amero, the surveillance grid, microchips, voting machines or the cashless system either. He never mentions the corporate, government and UN involvement in child sex slavery. He pays scant attention to real environmental and health threats. He absolves the CIA for it’s real crimes like drug running, false-flag terror and mind-control ops and I rarely hear him criticizing the evils of Communism. In fact I am sure he approves of it.. It’s always America that he saves his ammunition for.

    People, especially the Left, do not recognize what is actually going on because of the hold this man has on their minds. I could go on and on about it, but hopefully you can understand what I am saying.

  • ep // August 16, 2007 at 2:43 pm

    Noam Chomsky a ‘controlled asset of the New World Order’. What a joke. Proof that if you don’t subscribe to every theory/delusion of the right-wing populist conspiracy crowd, you’re a part of a New World Order ‘disinfo’ campaign or it’s a ‘hit piece’ on the ‘truth’. Chomsky’s analysis of most things is not only good, but careful to get to the root of issues of our system without being sensationalist. You know everyone’s drinking the same kool-aid when they’ll dismiss Chomsky for failing to address their pet non-issues. Example: Chomsky’s analysis of the use of media to control political discourse for the benefit of elites isn’t enough for tin-foil hatters who prefer terms like ‘mind-control ops’. Too bad Chomsky’s analysis is closer to reality. I hope the left recognizes that pjwalkers’ above rants, etc are more influenced by paranoid ultra-rightwingers, and continue to listen to Chomsky.

  • Pollywogs! » Blog Archive » A small, shining bastion of hope in a long, dark evening of dispair… // August 16, 2007 at 4:04 pm

    [...] http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2007/08/…; [...]

  • pjwalker911 // August 16, 2007 at 4:45 pm

    ep:

    The more I get attacked by the Right and the Left, the more I know I’m doing something right.

    You and your Left-Wing socialist comrades attempt to simplify the argument by calling me a part of a “right-wing populist conspiracy crowd” but you know that is inaccurate, misleading and just plain wrong. That is your own conspiracy theory that you cooked up. Those of us who can still think for ourselves choose to extricate our minds from this false Hegelian Left/Right paradigm and think freely, independently as individuals. You ought to try it some time. The more people can do this, the healthier society will become.

    You have the wrong visualization in your head. Because of your lop-sided perspective, you imagine that I am somewhere to the Right of Adolf Hitler or Atilla the Hun, but this is rediculous. I don’t like Right-Wing Neocon-Fascist-Nazis any more than I like Left-Wing Liberal-Socialist-Commies. I like decency and honesty instead of fanaticism and deception. If you are nice to me, I will be nice to you. But if you come after me, I have to defend myself. That’s the way it works.

    I deal with both sides of the dialectic and I am disgusted by both. Those who have sold their souls over to this type of mindless dualistic thought-trap always end up becoming blind fanatics who can never grasp the objective reality called “the Big Picture”. Instead they push one side of the New World Order agenda or the other, not knowing that at the top of the pyramid of power those agendas converge, meld and form a seamless unity such that Chomsky and Cheney serve the same masters whose agenda is a global high-tech Orwellian dictatorship under martial law.

    “Even if it was true, who cares?” That’s what your guru tells you about possible government complicity in 9/11, so I mean if you are content to go along with someone like that, then I just gotta say have at it. Knock yourself out.

    Chomsky is somewhere on the upper decks of that pyramid and the higher he goes, the closer he comes to that convergence with Dick Cheney who answers to the Rockefellers and their Council on Foreign Relations. You, on the other hand are probably somewhere down on the lower levels and so from your perspective, the gulf between Right and Left is seen as much wider apart. You are caught up in this illusion. Therefore, you can sit there and point at others you disagree with and say they are “Other” or on the “Right” side of you.

    Sorry, I don’t play that game. I am awake.

  • Signs of Fascism // August 16, 2007 at 6:27 pm

    Chomsky is not a puppet of the New World Order.

    On another note, I guess I am not surprised that Cheney issued stand down orders (if that is true). It gave the administration the political capital necessary to do whatever they might want to do, and they knew it.

  • pjwalker911 // August 16, 2007 at 8:34 pm

    The first WTC bombing was sponsored by the FBI using their own informant to carry it out. Just research it.

    At Oklahoma City, multiple high-tech bombs were INSIDE the building according to local newscasts and munitions experts like Fletcher Prouty. Research it.

    Look into P2 Gladio, a widely known and confirmed case of neo-fascist false-flag governement-sponsored terrorism, yet many liberals defend it by saying false-flag terror isn’t real, that it doesn’t exist. Or how about another example: let’s look at Operation Northwoods, a Pentagon plan to blow up planes and ships, bomb buildings and and even shoot people in the streets of America to get what General Lemnitzer called “a helpful wave of indignation” in order to invade Cuba. Liberals among ALL people should be hot under the collar to expose something like that, but noooo, they keep it under wraps and call it a “conspiracy theory”, so you see, most liberals aren’t even true liberals. They are minions of the establishment who worship at the feet of establishment shills like Noam Chomsky.

    On 9/11, you know, I don’t need to write a book for you and I don’t have time for that. Just go to sites like Architects for 9/11 Truth and look at their large and growing membership of fully credentialled architects and engineers. Go to Pilots for 9/11 truth and look at their membership of former military and commercial pilots with thousands of hours in the cockpit each. Look at Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice. Their membership has hundreds of degreed scientists from major universities across America and in Europe. If purusing these membership lists doesn’t tell you to sit up and take notice, then nothing will, even if you experience false-flag terror yourself. Or maybe in that case, you might wake up. Who knows? It all depends on how closely you are in contact with reality. But the point is, Noam Chomsky doesn’t consider false-flag terror as worthy of your attention.

    On mind-control, MK-Ultra is just one visible shard of the tip of the iceberg. For those who don’t think mind-control is worthy of our attention, they need to do a little research into how it has been deliberately used in PR, media, education, entertainment, advertising, propaganda, human experimentation, forced medication (including fluoride, ritalin and toxic vaccines) and a hundred other ways to control the masses, manipulate individuals and “manufacture consent”. But if the man who writes whole books on manufacturing consent isn’t willing to talk about mind-control and dismisses it as a conspiracy theory, then you can bet he is deliberately misdirecting you. And what he is actually misdirecting you on, is the actual motive or goal behind this mind-control and social engineering. He knows the global elite establishment that he works for (and invests in) wants to create a hive-mind slave society that does their bidding. They plan to accomplish this through multiple staged false-flag terror psyops to frighten the masses into accepting martial law, global government, a cashless system, biometrics, microchips, cameras, transhumanism and the whole nine yards of control-freakism to micro-manage and control every sentient lifeform on this planet.

    That is the elephant in the living room that Chomsky doesn’t want to talk about and he pretends it doesn’t exist. If he does talk about it, he knows he will be drummed out of the establishment and possibly made to suffer an “accident”. Like Woodrow Wilson who said: “…there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”, he knows about that danger. So being a coward, he prefers the comfortable bourgeoisie life that the establishment provides for him as long as he keeps the limits the debate to “the spectrum of acceptable opinion” as he calls it.

    If someone isn’t at least willing to look into these things, then it means you don’t care about the truth.

Leave a Comment