Dynasty? What dynasty? I don’t see no dynasty. Do you see a dynasty Georgie?
Nope, I don’t see no dynasty. Must be one of them outrageous conspiracy theories. Heh-heh-heh.
HILLARY: WHAT DYNASTY?
By GEOFF EARLE
DES MOINES, Iowa – Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton yesterday rejected the idea of a Clinton “dynasty” – confronting head-on the criticism that only people named Bush or Clinton have sat in the White House since 1989.
“There is no dynasty. There is no determination from on high. People get to vote for whoever they want. People get to vote against whoever they want,” Clinton told National Public Radio after a Democratic debate yesterday.
The former first lady also said she advised her husband on foreign policy when she took trips abroad and she invoked the Clinton name as a Bush-slayer.
“I was deeply involved in being part of the Clinton team during the first Clinton administration,” she said.
And, she added, “It takes a Clinton to clean up after a Bush.”
Mo Rocca on The Bushes and Clintons
Clinton, who has been slashing Sen. Barack Obama for two days, yesterday slammed John Edwards for attacking her vote for a resolution deeming Iran’s Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization.
“I understand politics, and I understand making outlandish political charges, but this really goes way too far,” she said.
Edwards had challenged her vote for the resolution, saying: “Declaring a military group sponsored by the state of Iran a terrorist organization, that’s supposed to be diplomacy?”
Clinton said the resolution may have helped convince Iran to change its behavior, but Sen. Joe Biden shot back that there was “no evidence, none, zero” that it had.
Clinton has been bombarding Obama since Sunday, when a Des Moines Register poll showed him ahead.
“I don’t think I’ve ever seen just an indiscriminate sort of spray we’ve seen since Sunday,” said Obama’s chief adviser, David Axelrod.
Bill Clinton, speaking in New Hampshire, complained that reporters were ignoring substantive issues – such as his wife’s record of public service.
“One percent of the press coverage was devoted to their record in public life. No wonder people think experience is irrelevant,” he said.
“Sixty-seven percent of the coverage is pure politics. That stuff has a half-life of about 15 seconds. It won’t matter tomorrow. It is very vulnerable to being slanted and rude. And it won’t affect your life.”
. . .
Related
The Bush-Clinton Dynasty in charge of America for 28 consecutive years?
Weapons Industry Dumps Republicans, Backs Hillary
Hillary Clinton: A Bilderberg Presidency
Clinton rakes in cash from the US weapons industry
Bush says Clinton will be Dem nominee
Bush quietly advising Hillary Clinton
Clintons dump politically sensitive stocks in Fox News, Big Oil, Big Pharma, Wal-Mart and Weapons
2 responses so far ↓
Carolyn // December 8, 2007 at 6:58 am
Bush-Clinton Dynasty! Get it right you lying monster, Hitlarry Clinton.
pjwalker911 // December 8, 2007 at 10:53 am
If you are implying there is no relationship between the Bushes and the Clintons, well then frankly you are just plain deluded. They are working for the exact same agenda of world government and the dissolution of all our freedoms. =tyranny They are the monsters, not me. Don’t shoot the messenger.