<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 225 delegates going to Rome to elect new Jesuit General</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2008/01/01/225-delegates-going-to-rome-to-elect-new-jesuit-general/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2008/01/01/225-delegates-going-to-rome-to-elect-new-jesuit-general/</link>
	<description>Independent Post-9/11 News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 03:54:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2008/01/01/225-delegates-going-to-rome-to-elect-new-jesuit-general/#comment-85081</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2008/01/01/225-delegates-going-to-rome-to-elect-new-jesuit-general/#comment-85081</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Yes, I find myself alone.
Hast thou faith? have it to thyself before God. 
Happy is he that condemneth not himself 
in that thing which he alloweth.    
Romans 14: 22 (KJV). 
The Jesuit agenda? 
Yes, I know; 
From Nimrod, Lucifer, 
fabricate Mohamed;
the history runs from Jehovah, God: 
I am Faithful first, thoughtful 2d and outreaching 3d.
These are my observable desires.
Change is everything; and
I would like to be Thoughtful first, out reaching 2d and
faithful last, to help me know what faithful
really is.
I do not believe that I should rely on what the
establishment conditions me to believe in as
thoughtful, outreaching and faithful; so
I explore weekly, daily if not minute by minute
to see, hear and experience.
I believe that I have to admit that when
I put being faithful first it is from
fear of not being faithful, as the result
of my past misjudged mistakes, and even
indulgence and abuse that memory
denies to me forgetfulness;
But I think I have come to know
that of myself as discovery: and therefore
have found myself not condemned for them,
But happy in allowing my self
to live in the moment more, as
the past I can not change, though
I can draw from it a new faith for tomorrow
that I still can not touch; and in all
it does free me to see, experience and be
as faithful as today allows me to be:
and if I can continue in that, I may
fulfill my desire to enhance and or fulfill
the desire for who I meet today. 
So for the new Jesuit General, 
will we expect him to be 
less human than ourselves? 
From the cross of Jesus, 
who should be without hope? 
I have hope to testify to all. 
I surprise myself in having so much
to write to you.
I think outreach is what God puts first: 
that is why His creation of us is 
in our free choice; 
and what kind of free choice 
Would not have been explored, 
If God did not allow all of it.
God&#039;s will is in what He allows, 
Not in what we find to condemn. 
He is bigger than that, are we? 
And in that question, can we be? 
And, in that, I thank you
for giving to me the opportunity
to see myself better from
what I have - taken the time 
and written to you.
Hopefully and Faithfully,
Steve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Yes, I find myself alone.<br />
Hast thou faith? have it to thyself before God.<br />
Happy is he that condemneth not himself<br />
in that thing which he alloweth.<br />
Romans 14: 22 (KJV).<br />
The Jesuit agenda?<br />
Yes, I know;<br />
From Nimrod, Lucifer,<br />
fabricate Mohamed;<br />
the history runs from Jehovah, God:<br />
I am Faithful first, thoughtful 2d and outreaching 3d.<br />
These are my observable desires.<br />
Change is everything; and<br />
I would like to be Thoughtful first, out reaching 2d and<br />
faithful last, to help me know what faithful<br />
really is.<br />
I do not believe that I should rely on what the<br />
establishment conditions me to believe in as<br />
thoughtful, outreaching and faithful; so<br />
I explore weekly, daily if not minute by minute<br />
to see, hear and experience.<br />
I believe that I have to admit that when<br />
I put being faithful first it is from<br />
fear of not being faithful, as the result<br />
of my past misjudged mistakes, and even<br />
indulgence and abuse that memory<br />
denies to me forgetfulness;<br />
But I think I have come to know<br />
that of myself as discovery: and therefore<br />
have found myself not condemned for them,<br />
But happy in allowing my self<br />
to live in the moment more, as<br />
the past I can not change, though<br />
I can draw from it a new faith for tomorrow<br />
that I still can not touch; and in all<br />
it does free me to see, experience and be<br />
as faithful as today allows me to be:<br />
and if I can continue in that, I may<br />
fulfill my desire to enhance and or fulfill<br />
the desire for who I meet today.<br />
So for the new Jesuit General,<br />
will we expect him to be<br />
less human than ourselves?<br />
From the cross of Jesus,<br />
who should be without hope?<br />
I have hope to testify to all.<br />
I surprise myself in having so much<br />
to write to you.<br />
I think outreach is what God puts first:<br />
that is why His creation of us is<br />
in our free choice;<br />
and what kind of free choice<br />
Would not have been explored,<br />
If God did not allow all of it.<br />
God&#8217;s will is in what He allows,<br />
Not in what we find to condemn.<br />
He is bigger than that, are we?<br />
And in that question, can we be?<br />
And, in that, I thank you<br />
for giving to me the opportunity<br />
to see myself better from<br />
what I have &#8211; taken the time<br />
and written to you.<br />
Hopefully and Faithfully,<br />
Steve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjwalker911</title>
		<link>http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2008/01/01/225-delegates-going-to-rome-to-elect-new-jesuit-general/#comment-71619</link>
		<dc:creator>pjwalker911</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 06:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2008/01/01/225-delegates-going-to-rome-to-elect-new-jesuit-general/#comment-71619</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s like being &quot;ex&quot; CIA in my view. No such thing. Or an ex-president like Clinton who probably wields more global power and influence than ever. Or a current example of Putin &quot;stepping down&quot; to be Prime Minister or whatever, and basically admitting that he will still be in control. No, he isn&#039;t demoting himself, just moving into a different level of control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s like being &#8220;ex&#8221; CIA in my view. No such thing. Or an ex-president like Clinton who probably wields more global power and influence than ever. Or a current example of Putin &#8220;stepping down&#8221; to be Prime Minister or whatever, and basically admitting that he will still be in control. No, he isn&#8217;t demoting himself, just moving into a different level of control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2008/01/01/225-delegates-going-to-rome-to-elect-new-jesuit-general/#comment-71608</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 03:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2008/01/01/225-delegates-going-to-rome-to-elect-new-jesuit-general/#comment-71608</guid>
		<description>Is this not a first?  Do you suppose Kolvenbach has a more sinister mission and is retiring on the surface only?  I seem to have read in T. Saucey&#039;s book that &quot;Blown cover is cover&quot; so with that principle in mind, do we really believe a 4th vow Jesuit is really retiring? 
We need to review Ps 2 in the Authorized Versionl, Jesus has to be shaking his head on these poor lost souls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this not a first?  Do you suppose Kolvenbach has a more sinister mission and is retiring on the surface only?  I seem to have read in T. Saucey&#8217;s book that &#8220;Blown cover is cover&#8221; so with that principle in mind, do we really believe a 4th vow Jesuit is really retiring?<br />
We need to review Ps 2 in the Authorized Versionl, Jesus has to be shaking his head on these poor lost souls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
