<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brainreading device sparks fears of Orwellian Minority Report dystopia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/brainreading-device-sparks-fears-of-authoritarian-minority-report-dystopia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/brainreading-device-sparks-fears-of-authoritarian-minority-report-dystopia/</link>
	<description>Independent Post-9/11 News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 03:54:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neuromarketing &#187; More Mind Reading</title>
		<link>http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/brainreading-device-sparks-fears-of-authoritarian-minority-report-dystopia/#comment-74044</link>
		<dc:creator>Neuromarketing &#187; More Mind Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/?p=6023#comment-74044</guid>
		<description>[...] no surprise that the neuroalarmists are out in full force. Kudos to Aftermath News for Brainreading device sparks fears of Orwellian Minority Report dystopia - using &#8220;Orwellian&#8221; in the second or third paragraph is all too common, but putting it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] no surprise that the neuroalarmists are out in full force. Kudos to Aftermath News for Brainreading device sparks fears of Orwellian Minority Report dystopia &#8211; using &#8220;Orwellian&#8221; in the second or third paragraph is all too common, but putting it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wil</title>
		<link>http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/brainreading-device-sparks-fears-of-authoritarian-minority-report-dystopia/#comment-74002</link>
		<dc:creator>wil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 19:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/?p=6023#comment-74002</guid>
		<description>On the flipside--the drug that erases or mutes memories concerns me too.

Isn&#039;t there a statement somewhere--Innocent until proven guilty--being ignored?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the flipside&#8211;the drug that erases or mutes memories concerns me too.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t there a statement somewhere&#8211;Innocent until proven guilty&#8211;being ignored?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wil</title>
		<link>http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2008/03/06/brainreading-device-sparks-fears-of-authoritarian-minority-report-dystopia/#comment-73993</link>
		<dc:creator>wil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 17:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/?p=6023#comment-73993</guid>
		<description>Always seemed like no big deal on StarTrek or other sci fi shows?

20% &quot;accuracy&quot; is like..no accuracy?  That&#039;s little better than random chance.

I did the hundred psi cards guessing thing once. I think random chance is like 9%  I did some runs and got 16 and 19%--which freaked them out, but I didn&#039;t see as meaning much.  Then did another time and got 3%, which was unusually sub par.

Whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always seemed like no big deal on StarTrek or other sci fi shows?</p>
<p>20% &#8220;accuracy&#8221; is like..no accuracy?  That&#8217;s little better than random chance.</p>
<p>I did the hundred psi cards guessing thing once. I think random chance is like 9%  I did some runs and got 16 and 19%&#8211;which freaked them out, but I didn&#8217;t see as meaning much.  Then did another time and got 3%, which was unusually sub par.</p>
<p>Whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
