Comments on: Rockefellers Seek Change at Exxon http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2008/05/27/rockefellers-seek-change-at-exxon/ Independent Post-9/11 News Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:49:49 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: wil http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2008/05/27/rockefellers-seek-change-at-exxon/#comment-75892 wil Tue, 27 May 2008 18:43:00 +0000 http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/?p=6393#comment-75892 "David Rockefeller, retired chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank and patriarch of the family, issued a statement saying, “I support my family’s efforts to sharpen Exxon Mobil’s focus on the environmental crisis facing all of us.”" I'm still pondering the bumpkin picture above, since obviously they are not. Or with that amount of money doesn't really matter--do what you want. I imagine just another false front and mouthpiece for Mr David. He makes it sound like they're acting on their own--yeah right. “David Rockefeller, retired chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank and patriarch of the family, issued a statement saying, “I support my family’s efforts to sharpen Exxon Mobil’s focus on the environmental crisis facing all of us.””

I’m still pondering the bumpkin picture above, since obviously they are not. Or with that amount of money doesn’t really matter–do what you want.

I imagine just another false front and mouthpiece for Mr David. He makes it sound like they’re acting on their own–yeah right.

]]> By: wil http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2008/05/27/rockefellers-seek-change-at-exxon/#comment-75886 wil Tue, 27 May 2008 16:40:08 +0000 http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/?p=6393#comment-75886 They--the Family-- should follow Kennedy's example. BTW--media said seizure from cancer and made it look like new thing or just discovered--but on "news" or something it was said If you want to know about Ted Kennedy and his fight, read his new book--and I'm like wtf? So----we're not really talking something new then are we? Was this really a seizure, or just ad hype for propaganda book? They–the Family– should follow Kennedy’s example.

BTW–media said seizure from cancer and made it look like new thing or just discovered–but on “news” or something it was said If you want to know about Ted Kennedy and his fight, read his new book–and I’m like wtf? So—-we’re not really talking something new then are we? Was this really a seizure, or just ad hype for propaganda book?

]]>