Aftermath News

Entries categorized as ‘Communism’

Beijing police block all protests during Olympics including free-speech pens

August 19, 2008 · 1 Comment

Police patrol World Park in Beijing, one of the three designated ‘protests zones’ in Beijing Photo: EPA

No protests have been allowed in any of the pens set aside for demonstrations at the Beijing Olympics despite 77 applications, Chinese police have admitted.

Telegraph | Aug 18, 2008

By Richard Spencer in Beijing

According to official figures released through state media in China, 149 people in total submitted the 77 applications, including three foreigners.

But despite their hope that they would for the first time be able to make a political point against the Chinese government legally and under the eyes of the world, the three parks which had been set aside for the purpose remain empty.

A police spokesman said that while 77 applications were put forward, of these 74 “were properly addressed by relevant authorities or departments through consultations” and had been withdrawn.

This usually means that complaints against officials over corruption, land confiscation and other local issues have been referred back to the very authorities that are subject of complaint.

Two had been “suspended” because they did not follow proper procedures - one because the applicants wanted to include children, who are not allowed to participate. The final application was “vetoed” by the public security bureau - Beijing’s police headquarters - because it was “in violation of China’s law on demonstrations and protests”.

It was stipulated in advance that protests could not violate “national, social and collective interests” - likely to rule out many major causes such as autonomy for Tibet, or greater democracy.

The promise of protest zones, intended as a sop to complaints over China’s human rights record, has caused some of the bitterest rows between international media and the Beijing and International Olympic Committees. Inquiries to the Beijing Olympic committee have been repeatedly referred to police without success.

“To date, what had been announced publicly doesn’t appear, in reality, to be happening, and a number of questions are being asked,” said Giselle Davies, chief spokesman of the IOC. “The IOC is keen to see those questions answered by the relevant authorities.”

Human Rights Watch and other groups claim that several of those who have tried to submit applications were subsequently detained by police and have not been seen since.

Nicholas Bequelin, a Hong Kong-based researcher for HRW, said the Olympics had set back the development of human rights in China.

“The Games have not helped, they have actually slowed down work that was progressing and increased abuses,” he said.

Meanwhile, an American Christian group staged a brief sit-in in Kunming airport in the south-west of the country after having 315 bibles taken from them by customs officials. Chinese law bans proselytising, but allows one bible per person for personal use.

Categories: Communism · Police State Dictatorship

China’s Hi-Tech Surveillance State Is Ready for Export

August 19, 2008 · No Comments

AlterNet | Aug 18, 2008

Democracy Now interview with Naomi Klein

By Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez

With 300,000 security cameras in Beijing alone, China is at the forefront of the surveillance boom — and U.S. corporations are reaping the profits.

Juan Gonzalez: China deported five international activists [last week] for unfurling a “Free Tibet” banner over the top of an Olympic Games billboard. It’s the latest incident in what has become an almost daily crackdown on both domestic and international protesters who have had to contend with a brand new surveillance system that China set up ahead of the games. This includes 300,000 security cameras and an estimated 100,000 security officers on duty in Beijing.

But it’s not just Beijing that’s gotten a security upgrade. There are now over 600 “safe” cities in China that have received new surveillance gear. The equipment and integrated security systems will remain long after the Olympics, to be used, many fear, on China’s own population. The domestic surveillance market in China is expected to reach $33 billion next year. And some of the biggest beneficiaries of this boom are U.S. hedge funds and corporations, such as Cisco, General Electric and Google.

Amy Goodman: Award-winning journalist and bestselling author Naomi Klein calls this “McCommunism.” Her latest article published in the Huffington Post is called “The Olympics: Unveiling Police State 2.0.” Naomi Klein is author of The Shock Doctrine. She joins us on the phone from Canada.

We’re also joined in our firehouse studio by investigative journalist and author Christian Parenti, who’s also just back from China. His latest piece for The Nation magazine is called “Class Struggle in the New China”.

We welcome you both to Democracy Now! Naomi Klein, let’s begin with you. Lay out what you also called in Rolling Stone the “all-seeing eye.”

Naomi Klein: Well, there’s an incredible operation going on in China to use the latest, what’s now called homeland security technology — networked surveillance cameras, biometric identification cards, facial recognition software — networking all of these cameras and running the software through it as a way to control an increasingly rebellious population. There’s an incredible statistic from 2005 that there were 87,000 mass incidents, which means protests and riots, across the country.

So it is already being used as a way to control the population and also to keep an eye on what in China is called the floating population, the migrant population, who are displaced by mega projects, who travel to cities like Beijing and Guangzhou and Shenzhen looking for work. This is a mobile population that is right now 130 million people. And this technology is used to keep track of those people, because in a sort of Maoist time in China, you had — where people stayed in their communities, you had networks of control and surveillance that were really about people snitching on their neighbors. When people are moving across long distances, the technology is replacing that. So “Police State 2.0″ is really about upgrading the surveillance system, with the help, as you said earlier, of U.S. companies like Cisco, General Electric, who have been providing these technologies.

Juan Gonzalez: Your article talks about — calls it the “Golden Shield,” as the Chinese refer to it, and you focus especially on the city of Shenzhen, in terms of the enormous reach of this. I was struck that you mentioned, for instance, that every internet cafe in China has surveillance cameras that are hooked up to local police stations so that they can keep an eye on who is using the internet cafes?

Naomi Klein: Yeah, and the internet cafes are — you know, they’re really like internet bowling alleys. They’re huge. An average-size internet cafe has 600 terminals. And there are dozens of cameras in the — not just obviously the cameras on the computers, but surveillance cameras. And this is a huge market. You mentioned that it’s worth $33 billion a year now. It’s actually — that’s even increased since I wrote that article. The latest estimate is that it’s going to be worth $43 billion, and — a year within two years.

And the reason why this is such a fast-growing market is that it’s not just that the internet cafes are installing these cameras; it’s that it’s a law now in China that they are required to install the cameras. So are at religious sites, so are entertainment sites, karaoke bars, restaurants. So, the government passes a law and says you must install these surveillance cameras, the companies comply, and then you have another set of companies who are connected to the party and also, as you said, to American companies. Many of them are listed on the NASDAQ, the New York Stock Exchange. And they are benefiting directly from this created market, this mandated market. You must install security cameras, so no wonder this is such a fast-growing market.

Complete Interview

Categories: Big Brother Surveillance Society · Communism · Crime & Corruption · Police State Dictatorship · Social Engineering

India, US, EU, Japan congratulate Nepal’s new Communist leader

August 18, 2008 · No Comments

Maoist guerilla chieftain Prachanda at a party meeting

India Times | Aug 16, 2008

KATHMANDU: India, United States, the European Union (EU) and Japan have congratulated Pushpa Kamal Dahal alias ‘Prachanda’ on being elected as the first Prime Minister of the Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal.

A press statement issued by the Indian Embassy in Kathmandu quoted Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh as saying, “I look forward to working with you to further develop the bonds of good neighborliness that unite our peoples and nations, and to deepen the friendly relations that so happily exist between the two countries.”

The statement said India will continue to stand by the people and Nepal in consolidating peaceful democratic transition and developmental efforts.

A press statement issued by the Embassy of the United States in Nepal said, “We hope that election of the Prime Minister removes the last barrier to speedy formation of a government, constructive action on key issues facing Nepal, and a start on the difficult but necessary task of drafting Nepal’s new constitution.”

The US also said it will continue its strong support for peace, democracy, human rights and development in Nepal.

Similarly, European Union Heads of Missions in Kathmandu said the election of Prime Minister brings to an end a period of uncertainty and paves the way for government formation.

“We look forward to the new government delivering to the people to meet their expectations for a prosperous future and taking forward the peace process, including through creating the environment for the drafting of a Constitution that secures peace, stability and democracy,” statement added.

A press statement issued by Embassy of Japan in Kathmandu said, “It wishes that the peace process will continue through the concerted efforts of all political parties so that the happiness and prosperity of Nepalis will materialize at the earliest.

Japan also expressed commitment to assist Nepal’s efforts toward the goal of drafting a new Constitution. It also expressed confidence that friendly and cooperative relations will be consolidated in the days ahead.

Prachanda, 53, trounced his Nepali Congress rival and three-time premier Sher Bahadur Deuba by bagging 464 votes out of the 577 cast in the 601-strong Constituent Assembly, receiving the backing of another major Left party the Communist Party of Nepal (United Marxist Leninist) and the Terai-based Madhesi Rights People’s Forum, Kantipur reported.

Related

Maoist guerrilla chieftain takes power in Nepal

Categories: Communism · Crime & Corruption

Human rights crackdown in China even worse during Olympics - activists disappear

August 18, 2008 · 2 Comments

The Games are detrimental to China’s overall human rights situation

Prominent human rights activist Hu Jia went missing the day before the start of the Olympics

AFP | Aug 18, 2008

China cracking down on dissent during Olympics

BEIJING (AFP) — China has cracked down on dissent for the Olympic Games and failed to honour public pledges to allow broader freedoms during the event, human rights groups and dissidents said.

China promised to improve the human rights situation in the country when it was awarded the Games in 2001 and said it would grant broad freedoms for foreign media to cover the event unhindered.

But 10 days into the event, the foreign media continues to complain about restrictions, would-be protesters have been detained, activists who disappeared before the Games have not resurfaced and dissidents have been harassed.

Nicholas Bequelin, China researcher for Human Rights Watch, said it was clear the Games had been detrimental to China’s overall human rights situation.

“The Games have not helped, they have actually slowed down work that was progressing and increased abuses,” he said.

“The approach that Beijing chose for the preparation of the Games was to suppress any critical voices and to prevent these voices from finding an echo in the international media.”

The government, which routinely bans demonstrations, set up three official protest zones in Beijing parks in a bid to display openness for the Games.

However the protests zones have been largely empty and several people who tried to demonstrate have found themselves in trouble.

Zhang Wei, a Beijing resident who has been trying to get compensation for the demolition of her house, is now serving 30 days in custody for ‘disturbing public order’ after applying for permission to protest, her son Mi Yu said.

“They made that annoucement for the outside world, but within the country, they repress people,” Mi, 23, told AFP by phone.

The 75-year-old mother of Hai Mingyu, an entrepreneur who managed to briefly unfurl a banner in Ritan Park, one of the protest zones, was detained for six hours in Beijing on Wednesday and questioned about her son’s protest.

Lawyers and activists working with dissidents have also reported increased harassment leading up to the Games in what they see as a deliberate attempt to muzzle them.

Zeng Jinyan, the wife of prominent human rights activist Hu Jia, who was jailed for more than three years in April for ‘inciting subversion against the state,’ went missing the day before the start of the Olympics.

“It’s clear that it’s because of the Olympic Games, because we lost contact just before the beginning of the Games,” Hu’s lawyer Li Fangping told AFP.

Li himself, a prominent human rights lawyer, said he had decided to leave Beijing at the end of July as the pressure was getting too heavy.

“I was being followed and watched, and the situation was very tense, so I decided to leave,” he said.

“Before the Olympics, the police authorities visited us and talked to the dissidents, and they were prepared for their freedoms to be restricted during the Olympics. And from what we have seen so far, many people have been followed or monitored.”

Since the Games opened last week, the Beijing Foreign Correspondent Club said it had recorded at least five separate incidents in which journalists had been harassed and prevented from working by police.

The authorities have also come under fire from media groups for blocking access to sensitive websites.

The International Olympic Committee has faced growing pressure over the issue of the empty protest parks and broader human rights issues as the Games have progressed.

IOC spokeswoman Giselle Davies conceded the protest parks were not functioning properly.

“To date, what had been announced publicly doesn’t appear, in reality, to be happening, and a number of questions are being asked,” she said.

“The IOC is keen to see those questions answered by the relevant authorities.”

But in response to hostile questioning from journalists, Davies has repeatedly insisted the IOC is happy with the overall handling of the Beijing Olympic Games.

Categories: Communism · Police State Dictatorship · Resistance

The 21 edicts from the Chinese Government’s propaganda unit

August 17, 2008 · 3 Comments

Related

Propaganda Points for Chinese Press Disclosed
A 21-point directive from the Chinese government’s propaganda department instructs Chinese news outlets to keep quiet about any “emergencies” at the Olympics, to stay “positive” about security measures, and to ignore pro-independence groups from Xinjiang and Tibet, an Australian newspaper reported yesterday. The Sydney Morning Herald published what it said was the text of the instructions.

Sydney Morning Herald | Aug 14, 2008

THE 21 EDICTS FROM THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT’S PROPAGANDA UNIT

1. The telecast of sports events will be live [but] in case of emergencies, no print is allowed to report on it.

2. From August 1, most of the previously accessible overseas websites will be unblocked. No coverage is allowed on this development. There’s also no need to use stories published overseas on this matter and [website] operators should not provide any superlinks on their pages.

3. Be careful with religious and ethnic subjects.

4. Don’t make fuss about foreign leaders at the opening ceremony, especially in relation to seat arrangements or their private lives.

5. We have to put special emphasis on ethnic equality. Any perceived racist terms as “black athlete” or “white athlete” is not allowed. During the official telecast, we can refer to Taiwan as “Chinese Taipei”. In ordinary times, refer to Taiwanese athletes as “those from the precious island Taiwan…..” In case of any pro Taiwan-independence related incident inside the venue, you shall follow restrictions listed in item 1.

6. For those ethnic Chinese coaches and athletes who come back to Beijing to compete on behalf of other countries, don’t play up their “patriotism” since that could backfire with their adopted countries.

7. As for the Pro-Tibetan independence and East Turkistan movements, no coverage is allowed. There’s also no need to make fuss about our anti-terrorism efforts.

8. All food saftey issues, such as cancer-causing mineral water, is off-limits.

9. In regard to the three protest parks, no interviews and coverage is allowed.

10. No fuss about the rehearsals on August 2,5. No negative comments about the opening ceremony.

11.No mention of the Lai Changxing case.

12.No mention of those who illegally enter China.

13.On international matters, follow the official line. For instance, follow the official propaganda line on the North Korean nuclear issue; be objective when it comes to the Middle East issue and play it down as much as possible; no fuss about the Darfur question; No fuss about UN reform; be careful with Cuba. If any emergency occurs, please report to the foreign ministry.

14. If anything related to territorial dispute happens, make no fuss about it. Play down the Myanmar issue; play down the Takeshima island dispute.

15. Regarding diplomatic ties between China and certain nations, don’t do interviews on your own and don’t use online stories. Instead, adopt Xinhua stories only. Particularly on the Doha round negotiation, US elections, China-Iran co-operation, China-Aussie co-operation, China-Zimbabwe co-operation, China-Paraguay co-operation.

16.Be very careful with TV ratings, only use domestic body’s figures. Play it down when  rating goes down.

17. In case of an emergency involving foreign tourists, please follow the official line. If there’s no official line, stay away from it.

18. Re possible subway accidents in the capital, please follow the official line.

19.Be positive on security measures.

20. Be very careful with stock market coverage during the Games.

21.Properly handle coverage of the Chinese sports delegation:

A.don’t criticise the selection process

B.don’t overhype gold medals; don’t issue predictions on gold medal numbers; don’t make fuss about  cash rewards for athletes.

C.don’t make a fuss about isolated misconducts by athletes.

D.enforce the publicity of our anti-doping measures.

E. put emphasis on  government efforts to secure the retirement life of atheletes.

F. keep a cool head on the Chinese performance. Be prepared for possible fluctations in the medal race.

G. refrain from publishing opinion pieces at odds with the official propangada line of the Chinese delegation.

Categories: Communism · Police State Dictatorship

Rounded up into torture camps: the ‘undesirables’ China doesn’t want you to see

August 17, 2008 · No Comments

Out in force: Security on patrol before the Olympic opening ceremony

In China, the camps bear the slogan ‘Re-education Through Labour’. (It’s a peculiar irony that Beijing has been so determined to use the English language to welcome the world, that street signs even bear the chilling words.)

Daily Mail | Aug 16, 2008

By  Andrew Malone

The bleak concrete walls topped with razor wire and the sentries in towers at the gates are a chilling reminder of a different era.

On the nearby roads, heavily armed guards patrol relentlessly, checking both drivers and pedestrians, constantly alert.

Meanwhile, less than 30 miles away, the world’s attention is focused on the world-famous ‘Bird’s Nest’ Olympic stadium and the other venues where a global audience of two billion is watching the Games and enjoying the spectacle of the ‘new’ China.

The Beijing regime has deployed an army of 500,000 smiling volunteers to help foreigners find their way around the teeming capital city.

Blades of grass have been individually combed. Signs have been erected in English.

Spitting has been banned and taxi drivers have been told to wear ties.

But there’s none of that here in the suburb of Daxing, where the only ‘venues’ are the five camps into which thousands of China’s ‘undesirables’ have been swept from the streets of Beijing and locked up.

Here, down bumpy, unlit roads, is where old habits die hard for China’s brutal totalitarian communist regime.

These camps are being used to imprison  -  without trial or legal representation  -  people that the regime wants the world to believe do not exist amid the miracle of modern China.

From street children, hawkers, the homeless and prostitutes, to the mentally ill, black migrants, drug dealers and gays caught in public bathhouses, the camps on the outskirts of the city started filling up with Beijing’s ‘undesirables’ last year as part of the Chinese regime’s determination to present what it sees as an acceptable face to the world.

It is all eerily reminiscent of the build-up to the 1936 Games in Berlin, when the government cleared similar ‘undesirables’ from the streets.

Under Hitler’s regime many of the Nazi concentration camps bore the slogan Arbeit macht frei (Work makes you free) at their gates.

In China, the camps bear the slogan ‘Re-education Through Labour’. (It’s a peculiar irony that Beijing has been so determined to use the English language to welcome the world, that street signs even bear the chilling words.)

The camps themselves are festooned with banners in Mandarin Chinese stating that ‘you must be punished according to the laws of the Olympics’, and reveal the extraordinary lengths to which the Chinese are prepared to go to in order to convince the world of the country’s success.

Working up to 16 hours a day and held in cramped, unsanitary cells with only one toilet bucket for dozens of inmates, the existence of the jailed ‘undesirables’ is something China has done its best to hide.

The policy of ‘people clearances’ began last year and those taken in were moved to the camps on the outskirts of Beijing, which were built in the 1960s for the purposes of ‘cleansing’ the minds of dissidents opposed to the state.

By using torture, brainwashing techniques and the use of heavy labour, Chairman Mao was determined to convince opponents of the error of their ways.

The camps have been used in more recent times to hold dissidents, lawyers and followers of religions banned by the government.

But sweeps of the city ahead of the influx of foreign visitors have meant these dissidents have been joined by a new list of victims, who have until now been allowed to work freely in the capital.

Deploying thousands of undercover police, as well as uniformed groups of youths wearing red shirts and armbands, strenuous efforts have been made to ensure the city has been purged of all ‘anti-social’ elements.

African immigrants to Beijing have been rounded up from popular tourist areas such as San li Tun, Beijing’s equivalent of Soho.

The patrols of the red- shirted groups are constant. Even now, with the Games under way, some residents are not safe from arrest and incarceration.

‘Tony’, a Nigerian entrepreneur who has lived in China for the past three years, watched as dozens of his African friends were arrested last month. He hasn’t seen them since.

‘I started running when I saw what was happening,’ he told me. ‘I’ve heard they are in the camps. I’m just keeping my head down until you lot [foreigners] go and hoping it all returns to normal.’

With the few remaining black people and some gay men banned from entire areas, along with instructions from the authorities that they should not be served in bars or restaurants, witnesses say thousands of others have been bundled into unmarked vans and taken to the camps on the outskirts of the city.

According to prison camp sources, who risk incarceration and torture for simply speaking about what happens inside the camps, the ‘undesirables’ are separated into male and female groups.

They are then put to work in vast hangar-like sheds, where they are forced to make chopsticks and soft toys  -  the very goods that are being peddled on the streets of Beijing to tourists visiting the Olympics.

Inmates are forced to work through the night.

In some of the other camps  -  all located in the Tuan He district in the Daxing suburb of Beijing, less than an hour’s drive from the Bird’s Nest stadium  -  the ‘ undesirables’ are forced to clean beans and other Chinese foods  -  which are then sold by the communist authorities to private businesses serving the influx of foreigners.

Punishment is brutal for those who try to resist. According to my camp informant, women who do not work hard enough are stripped naked for days on end  -  something regarded as particularly shaming in Chinese society.

Another favoured method of punishment is called the Tiger Bench  -  where ‘undesirables’ are forced to sit upright on a long bench with their hands tied behind their backs. Their thighs are also tied to the bench  -  and bricks placed under the feet to raise them off the floor.

Human rights groups say some victims are forced to remain in this position for days on end, causing excruciating pain.

Those who complain or refuse to eat in protest at their detention are force-fed  -  with guards holding their mouths open and tipping food down their victims’ gullets, making them choke and vomit. There are more than 1,000 of these camps located around this country of more than 1.3 billion people.

In 2005, the authorities opened one Re-education Through Labour Camp to United Nations investigators investigating claims that inmates were being killed and their organs ‘harvested’ and sold to wealthy Chinese desperate for transplants.

Nothing untoward was found. The camp had even been painted ahead of the UN visit.

Dissidents claimed later that victims are transferred from camp to camp whenever any brutality is discovered by outside bodies.

The sweep of the city is good news for the prison camp guards, who are making extra money from the Olympics.

Sources say they are getting as much overtime as they want a result of the thousands of ‘undesirables’ rounded up.

Full Story

Categories: Communism · Crime & Corruption · Police State Dictatorship · Social Engineering · Torture Inquisition

Maoist guerrilla chieftain takes power in Nepal

August 15, 2008 · 1 Comment

“Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.”

-    Mao Zedong

Former rebel leader Prachanda smiles in the Constituent Assembly after being elected prime minister in Kathmandu August 15, 2008. Lawmakers elected a Maoist who led a decade-long insurgency against the Hindu monarchy as Nepal’s new prime minister on Friday, marking the Himalayan nation’s radical change into a democratic republic. REUTERS/Gopal Chitrakar (NEPAL)

Related

‘Maoist Republic’ on its way

Nepal Maoists hail global revival of Communism

The Maoist leader becomes the most powerful politician in the country

BBC | Aug 15, 2008

Members of Nepal’s parliament have overwhelmingly elected the Maoist leader Prachanda as the country’s new prime minister.

The 53-year-old won 80% of votes to defeat his only rival, the Congress Party candidate, Sher Bahadur Deuba.

Maoists won a surprise victory in April elections, and two other key parties supported Prachanda in the vote.

Last month, Nepal swore in a mainly ceremonial president, Ram Baran Yadav, after the monarchy was scrapped in May.

‘Lenin or Napoleon’

It is only two years since Prachanda emerged from more than two decades underground as a militant communist leader.
“I am very happy and very emotional,” he said as he left the constituent assembly after the vote, reported AFP news agency.

What the Maoists called their “people’s war” had left 13,000 people dead, tens of thousands displaced and much of the country’s infrastructure destroyed.

The BBC’s Charles Haviland in Kathmandu says that now the former guerrilla will be the most powerful politician in the Himalayan country, after 464 lawmakers gave him their vote and only 113 rejected him.

The Maoists’ deputy leader, Baburam Bhattarai, said: “Today is a day of pride and it will be written with golden letters in the history of the nation.”

He predicted earlier that Prachanda would be a leader “for a new era”, comparable to Lenin or Napoleon.

Friday’s ballot ends months of political deadlock that had followed the sacking of the unpopular King Gyanendra and the abolition of the 240-year-old monarchy.

Our correspondent says that Prachanda’s elevation had long seemed inevitable after his party scored its convincing win in April.

Prachanda was almost guaranteed victory because he had the support of three parties - his own, the Communist Party of Nepal (United Marxist-Leninist) and the MJF (Madheshi Janadhikar Forum).

The Maoists’ Congress Party rivals accused them before the vote of plotting to set up a totalitarian communist regime, a suggestion they strongly denied.

A former agricultural science teacher-turned-revolutionary, Prachanda was originally named Pushpa Kamal Dahal, but he still uses his guerrilla nom de guerre.

Related

“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

- George Santayana

Pol Pot (L) was elected prime minister of the new communist government in 1976

Pol Pot and his army, called the Khmer Rouge, came to power in Cambodia (Kampuchea) in 1975. He was named prime minister of the new communist government in 1976 and began a program of violent reform. The Khmer Rouge abolished currency, religion and private property and evacuated cities in the hopes of creating a Maoist agrarian society free of Western influence (though, like Mao, Pol Pot had studied the works of V. I. Lenin and Karl Marx in Europe). Under his regime, forced labor, executions and famine killed between 1.5 and 2 million Cambodians (more than 20% of the population

Pol Pot is frequently named among the baddest guys in history, along with Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler… He was also referred to by his followers as “Brother Number One”… the countryside of Cambodia was dubbed “the killing fields” because of the Khmer Rouge atrocities.

Cambodia’s Murderous Mystery Man
Philip Short writes in his superb, authoritative account of the man and the madness that transformed Cambodia, almost overnight, into hell on earth. “Individual rights were not curtailed in favor of the collective, but extinguished altogether. Individual creativity, initiative, originality were condemned per se. Individual consciousness was systematically demolished.”

Categories: Communism · Crime & Corruption · Police State Dictatorship · Socialism

China’s choreographed detentions

August 15, 2008 · No Comments

Expelled U.S. protesters tell of hospitality and haranguing


Washington Post | Aug 14, 2008

BEIJING, Aug. 14 — As he sat munching Kentucky Fried Chicken with his captors at a Beijing police station last week, the Rev. Patrick J. Mahoney couldn’t help thinking that he was going to be used as a star in an upcoming Chinese propaganda film.

Along with two other Americans, Mahoney had been dragged from Tiananmen Square just a couple of hours earlier, as they attempted to unfurl a “Jesus Christ Is King” banner and protest human rights abuses in China, including forced abortions. Such public expressions of belief are illegal in this country.

Now Mahoney and the others were being subjected to a classic good-cop, bad-cop interrogation routine, in this case augmented with official Chinese photographers. With the good cop in charge, out came the cameras, recording everything. When the bad cop came in, no shutters clicked.

“I was thinking, ‘Oh, my goodness. I can see it now. The Chinese, accused of harsh and brutal tactics against human rights protesters, show that they serve KFC and tea to their prisoners.’ They wanted to document our treatment,” Mahoney said in a telephone interview after he returned to Washington this week, the Chinese visa in his passport stamped with red ink: Expelled, Aug. 7, 2008.

Before the Olympic Games opened, Chinese leaders publicly exhorted their 100,000-plus security team in Beijing to guard against public demonstrations that could mar China’s international image.

The focus of their strategy for handling protests by foreigners, emerging now after about half a dozen small-scale incidents, seems to be to limit the force used to subdue participants — especially in an age of cellphone cameras and YouTube — while documenting any gentle treatment in custody. Those detained, some of them seasoned religious and political activists who expect arrest, said another police goal is to get them to admit they broke a Chinese law against disturbing public order.

The Beijing Public Security Bureau information office has declined to comment on specific cases, except to say its officers take action when anyone, including foreigners, is “conducting activities against Chinese law.”

Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang said at a regular press briefing on Wednesday that “just as in other countries, assemblies, processions and demonstrations must be held according to relevant legal regulations and procedures, and shall not be carried out without approval from relevant authorities.”

The Olympics have long been seen by protesters as an opportunity to air their grievances against host countries. Many host countries, in turn, have tried to contain demonstrations by setting aside special protest zones, as China has done. But in Beijing, there have been no reports of anyone using the “protest pens,” and some Chinese who have tried to obtain permits to do so have been detained.

Unwilling to detain foreign protesters for long periods, the Chinese have decided instead to hustle them out of the country. Their strategy is not without precedent. During the 1994 Winter Games in Lillehammer, Norwegian authorities deported 12 Americans who were apparently planning an antiabortion protest. During the 1968 Summer Games in Mexico City, two American sprinters were expelled after bowing their heads and saluting in a nod to black power on the medal stand. So far in Beijing, no athlete has attempted a political statement on the stand.

But Beijing has shown exceptional concern about its image, according to those deported so far.

“They had an extreme commitment to order and appearance,” said Mahoney, a veteran activist who directs the antiabortion Christian Defense Coalition.

Full Story

Categories: Communism · Police State Dictatorship

Maoist leader to stand in Nepal PM election

August 14, 2008 · No Comments

Maoist leader Prachanda talks to reporters after filing his candidacy for the election of the Nepal’s prime minister in Kathmandu. Prachanda has announced he will stand in elections to become the Himalayan country’s first post-royal premier.  (AFP/Prakash Mathema

AFP | Aug 14, 2008

KATHMANDU (AFP) — The head of Nepal’s former rebel Maoists, who led a campaign of armed struggle for a decade, announced Thursday he would stand in elections to become the country’s first post-royal prime minister.

Nepal has been in political limbo since the country’s 240-year-old monarchy was abolished in late May, with the former guerrillas and mainstream political parties unable to agree who will run the new government.

“The months of political deadlock have come to an end,” Maoist leader Prachanda told reporters after filing his candidacy for the prime ministerial election set for Friday.

The Maoists, once feared rebels, are now Nepal’s most potent political force after winning just over one-third of the seats in the body that abolished the monarchy and is supposed to draft a new constitution.

In Friday’s election, the winner needs a simple majority of the votes from 595 lawmakers, or at least 298.

The Maoists have forged an alliance with Nepal’s third biggest party — the Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist-Leninist) — meaning Prachanda has an excellent shot at winning the post.

“We have won the support of the UML. Now we will have a two-thirds majority to run the government,” said Prachanda, whose nom-de-guerre means “the fierce one.”

The Maoists have 227 seats in the assembly, while the UML has 108.

Prachanda, who signed up to a landmark peace deal with the country’s mainstream parties in 2006, has had trouble shaking off his ruthless warlord image.

But many believe he is now the right man to rebuild the impoverished Himalayan country wedged between India and China after the deadly 10-year-long civil war that ravaged the country’s economy.

The only opposition to Prachanda will come from Nepal’s oldest and second biggest party, the Nepali Congress.

Congress, led by the current prime minister Girija Prasad Koirala, will field a candidate on Friday and will not participate in the new government if they are defeated, their spokesman said.

“There is no question of joining the Maoist-led government if our candidate suffers defeat,” the spokesman, Arjun Narsingh Khatri Chettri, told AFP.

“We will stay in the opposition and play a constructive role so that the peace process remains on track.”

The Maoists signed the 2006 peace deal after former king Gyanendra was forced to end a period of authoritarian rule in the face of massive protests.

Koirala, 84, has been at the centre of the often violent struggle for democracy in Nepal since the 1940s. He led the coalition that forced Gyanendra to stand aside in April 2006 and has been premier ever since.

Categories: Communism

British journalist ‘forcibly restrained’ for reporting on pro-Tibet protest in Beijing

August 13, 2008 · No Comments

Independent | Aug 13, 2008

A British TV journalist described today how he was “forcibly restrained” and dragged across a street as Chinese police stopped him reporting on a pro-Tibet protest in Beijing.

John Ray, of ITV News, said he was left with cuts and bruises after being “slung” in the back of a police van by officers arresting activists from Students for a Free Tibet.

Mr Ray was taken away by officers as members of the campaign group handcuffed themselves to each other at the Chinese Ethnic Culture Park, near the National Stadium in Beijing.

The reporter, who became ITV News’ China correspondent in 2006, said: “I was held in a restaurant and physically and forcibly restrained there.

“I tried to explain to these people that I was a journalist but they dragged me out and slung me in in the back of a police van and held me there for another few minutes.

“Nobody punched me but they were very forceful and I have a cut knee and a bruise on my finger.

“They basically dragged me into the restaurant and then out, and took my shoes off me.”

Mr Ray was only released from the Chinese police van after his producer showed them accreditation.

He added: “I was able to eventually show them my journalist credentials and they realised I was a British journalist and the next time the door of the van opened I was able to walk out.

“They did ask me, in English, what my views were on Tibet and I said ‘I don’t have any views, I’m a journalist’.

“I was there purely to report on a protest and took no part in the protest itself.

“We then contacted the British Embassy and they are taking it up at consular level.”

A spokesman at the British embassy said: “We are aware of the incident and have spoken directly to John Ray.

“We have expressed our strong concern to the Chinese authorities and we are pleased that he has been released.”

Mr Ray previously worked as ITV News’ UK editor and was best-known for his coverage of the 7/7 terror attacks and Northern Ireland.

He joined ITN in July 2000 from Sky News, where he was a political correspondent, after starting his career in print journalism working on the Warrington Guardian and then the Western Morning News.

Eight members of the campaign group were arrested after two of them hung a Free Tibet banner near the gates of the park.

The incident is the second time Students for a Free Tibet have grabbed international headlines for their exploits during the Olympics.

Britons Lucy Fairbrother, 23, and Iain Thom, 24, were deported after unfurling a 140 sq ft banner reading “One World, One Dream, Free Tibet” in Beijing before the games started.

ITN said it would be making the “strongest possible” protest.

An ITN spokesman said: “John Ray is a fully accredited China correspondent who was doing his legitimate job as a journalist.

“We intend to protest in the strongest possible terms to the Chinese authorities and seek assurances that the treatment meted out to Mr Ray will not be repeated.”

The International Olympic Committee said it was investigating.

A spokesman said: “The IOC has learned through media reports that a British journalist was allegedly assaulted today while covering a demonstration near an Olympic venue in Beijing.

“The IOC’s position is clear: the media must be free to report on the Olympic Games.

“We are endeavouring to discover the full facts of this incident and, if necessary, will raise our concerns with the appropriate authority.”

Categories: Communism · Police State Dictatorship · Resistance