Aftermath News

Entries categorized as ‘European Union’

EU security proposals are ‘dangerously authoritarian’

June 16, 2009 · Leave a Comment

The European Union is stepping up efforts to build an enhanced pan-European system of security and surveillance which critics have described as “dangerously authoritarian”.

Telgraph | Jun 15, 2009

By Bruno Waterfield in Brussels

Civil liberties groups say the proposals would create an EU ID card register, internet surveillance systems, satellite surveillance, automated exit-entry border systems operated by machines reading biometrics and risk profiling systems.

Europe’s justice ministers will hold talks on the “domestic security policy” and surveillance network proposals, known in Brussels circles as the “Stockholm programme”, on July 15 with the aim of finishing work on the EU’s first ever internal security policy by the end of 2009.

Jacques Barrot, the European justice and security commissioner, yesterday publicly declared that the aim was to “develop a domestic security strategy for the EU”, once regarded as a strictly national “home affairs” area of policy.

“National frontiers should no longer restrict our activities,” he said.

Mark Francois, Conservative spokesman on Europe, has demanded “immediate clarity on where the government stands on this”.

“These are potentially dangerous proposals which could interfere in Britain’s internal security,” he said.

“The chaos and division in Gordon Brown’s government is crippling Britain’s ability to make its voice heard in Europe.”

Critics of the plans have claimed that moves to create a new “information system architecture” of Europe-wide police and security databases will create a “surveillance state”.

Tony Bunyan, of the European Civil Liberties Network (ECLN), has warned that EU security officials are seeking to harness a “digital tsunami” of new information technology without asking “political and moral questions first”.

“An increasingly sophisticated internal and external security apparatus is developing under the auspices of the EU,” he said.

Mr Bunyan has suggested that existing and new proposals will create an EU ID card register, internet surveillance systems, satellite surveillance, automated exit-entry border systems operated by machines reading biometrics and risk profiling systems.

“In five or 10 years time when we have the surveillance and database state people will look back and ask, ‘what were you doing in 2009 to stop this happening?’,” he said.

Civil liberties groups are particularly concerned over “convergence” proposals to herald standardise European police surveillance techniques and to create “tool-pools” of common data gathering systems to be operated at the EU level.

Under the plans the scope of information available to law enforcement agencies and “public security organisations” would be extended from the sharing of existing DNA and fingerprint databases, kept and stored for new digital generation ID cards, to include CCTV video footage and material gathered from internet surveillance.

The Lisbon Treaty, currently stalled after Ireland’s referendum rejection last year, creates a secretive new Standing Committee for Internal Security, known as COSI, to co-ordinate policy between national forces and EU organisations such as Europol, the Frontex borders agency, the European Gendarmerie Force and the Brussels intelligence sharing Joint Situation Centre or Sitcen.

EU officials have told The Daily Telegraph that the radical plans will be controversial and will need powers contained within the Lisbon Treaty, currently awaiting a second Irish vote this autumn.

“The British and some others will not like it as it moves policy to the EU,” said an official. “Some of things we want to do will only be realistic with the Lisbon Treaty in place, so we need that too.”

Categories: Big Brother Surveillance Society · European Union · Police State Dictatorship

Military religious order awards EU Commissioner with Maltese Cross

June 3, 2009 · 4 Comments

BELGIUM-EU-CHINA-US-PRODUCT-SAFETY

Bulgarian European Commissioner Meglena Kuneva (C), Chinese Vice Minister Wei Chuanzhong (L) and US acting Chairman of the Consumer Product Safety Commission Nancy Nord (R) hold a press conference on November 17, 2008 after an EU-China-US trilateral summit at EU headquarters in Brussels. Getty Images

novinite.com | June 2, 2009

European Commissioner Meglena Kuneva has been honoured with The Maltese Cross at an official ceremony in Sofia.

The ambassador of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta to Sofia, Camillo Zuccoli personally presented the Cross to Kuneva.

The leader of the National Movement for Stability and Progress party, Simeon Saxe-Coburg, Ombudsman Ginyo Ganev and the recently re-elected Governor of the Bulgarian National Bank, Ivan Iskrov, were present at the ceremony.

Kuneva received the award on behalf of the Grand Master of the order Fra’Matthew Festing for her helping with the development of European and Christian values and for her efforts as European Commissioner.

Kuneva is the No.1 candidate on the National Movement for Stability and Progress ticket for the coming European Parliamentary elections together

At present the organizations of the Order of Malta are spread over five continents and include over 100 000 volunteers and medical staff.

The Maltese cross or Amalfi cross is identified as the symbol of an order of Christian warriors known as the Knights Hospitaller or Knights of Malta. It was originally the symbol of Amalfi, a small Italian republic of the 11th century, but has come to be identified with the Mediterranean island of Malta. It is considered one of the National symbols of Malta.

________

Related

Former Soviet Dissident Warns For EU Dictatorship

Categories: Christianity · European Union · Illuminati · Secret Societies · Vatican

Origins Of The Bilderberg Group Meeting Show Possible Links To The Knights Of Malta

May 15, 2009 · 2 Comments

Rogers Report | May 14, 2009

By Lee Rogers

The secretive 2009 Bilderberg Group meeting is currently under way in Greece. The Bilderberg Group meeting is an annual event where roughly 100 to 150 of the most powerful individuals from the world of business and politics formulate their agenda. This meeting has taken place since 1954 and has received very little corporate controlled media coverage despite its obvious importance. Last year’s attendees included people like current Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, former Chairman of Chase Manhatten Bank David Rockefeller, former Goldman Sachs CEO and Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson, current Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, current Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford, former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, Google CEO Eric Schmidt and former Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice. The entire attendee list of the 2008 Bilderberg Group meeting can be viewed here and the list contains some of the most powerful men and women in North America and Europe. Obviously, a group of people like this do not meet on an annual basis just for fun and the 2009 meeting which will take place from May 14th – May 17th is no exception. What’s interesting about the Bilderberg Group meeting is its origins which link back not only to European royalty but quite possibly the Knights of Malta as well.

Joseph Retinger

Joseph Retinger

Prince Bernhard’s role in the foundation of the Bilderberg Group is fairly well known but the man that played a much more central role in its formation was a man by the name Joseph Retinger. Retinger a Polish political adviser and Catholic was one of the early advocates of European integration and proponents of the Council of Europe. He is widely believed to have been a member of the Knights of Malta. Sylvia Browne in her book Secret Societies — And How They Affect Our Lives Today lists Retinger as being a member of this organization.

In Holly Sklar’s book Trilateralism, the following is said of Retinger’s involvement in the formation of the Bilderberg Group.

Bilderberg has its inception in the brilliant brain of Dr. Joseph Retinger, an extraordinary character who flitted through Europe talking on intimate terms with Prime Ministers, labour leaders, industrial magnates, revolutionaries and intellectuals – in short all the non-Communist rulers and would-be rulers of the free nations of Europe.

The book also describes Retinger’s involvement with individuals like John Foster Dulles and W. Averell Harriman as well as other high profile individuals who have long been associated with moving the global government agenda forward.

Retinger is considered to be the brains behind the formation of the Bilderberg Group where as Prince Bernhard played more of a figure head role serving as its first chairman. It is interesting to see how a man who is widely believed to have been a member of the Knights of Malta was actually behind the creation of this group. Much of the alternative media places a focus on Prince Bernhard when tracing back to the group’s origins. This is despite the fact that Retinger played a much more central role in the creation of this group relative to Prince Bernhard.

Considering Retinger’s principle role in the foundation of Bilderberg, the possibility of his involvement with the Knights of Malta is a very interesting topic of conversation. Many researchers believe that the Bilderberg Group is the most powerful of them all. If Retinger’s involvement in the Knights of Malta is true and there’s a lot of information to believe that it is, this raises serious questions about the Bilderberg Group truly being at the top of any proposed pyramidal control structure. There is little question that the Bilderberg Group is powerful, but if a member of the Knights of Malta was its primary founder, wouldn’t the Knights of Malta and the Vatican arguably be far more powerful? One has to ask the question as to why Retinger’s involvement in the creation of the Bilderberg Group isn’t more widely discussed and scrutinized by people in the alternative research community.

Categories: European Union · Global Government · Illuminati · Secret Societies · Thinktanks · Vatican

Secret report: Nazis planned Fourth Reich in a new European Union

May 10, 2009 · Leave a Comment

874-7

Plotters: SS chief Heinrich Himmler with Max Faust, engineer with Nazi-backed company I. G. Farben

For now, the nation state endures. But these three typewritten pages are a reminder that today’s drive towards a European federal state is inexorably tangled up with the plans of the SS and German industrialists for a Fourth Reich – an economic rather than military imperium.

Daily Mail | May 9, 2009

Revealed: The secret report that shows how the Nazis planned a Fourth Reich …in the EU

By Adam Lebor

The paper is aged and fragile, the typewritten letters slowly fading. But US Military Intelligence report EW-Pa 128 is as chilling now as the day it was written in November 1944.

The document, also known as the Red House Report, is a detailed account of a secret meeting at the Maison Rouge Hotel in Strasbourg on August 10, 1944. There, Nazi officials ordered an elite group of German industrialists to plan for Germany’s post-war recovery, prepare for the Nazis’ return to power and work for a ’strong German empire’. In other words: the Fourth Reich.

The three-page, closely typed report, marked ‘Secret’, copied to British officials and sent by air pouch to Cordell Hull, the US Secretary of State, detailed how the industrialists were to work with the Nazi Party to rebuild Germany’s economy by sending money through Switzerland.

They would set up a network of secret front companies abroad. They would wait until conditions were right. And then they would take over Germany again.

The industrialists included representatives of Volkswagen, Krupp and Messerschmitt. Officials from the Navy and Ministry of Armaments were also at the meeting and, with incredible foresight, they decided together that the Fourth German Reich, unlike its predecessor, would be an economic rather than a military empire – but not just German.

The Red House Report, which was unearthed from US intelligence files, was the inspiration for my thriller The Budapest Protocol.

The book opens in 1944 as the Red Army advances on the besieged city, then jumps to the present day, during the election campaign for the first president of Europe. The European Union superstate is revealed as a front for a sinister conspiracy, one rooted in the last days of the Second World War.

But as I researched and wrote the novel, I realised that some of the Red House Report had become fact.

Nazi Germany did export massive amounts of capital through neutral countries. German businesses did set up a network of front companies abroad. The German economy did soon recover after 1945.

The Third Reich was defeated militarily, but powerful Nazi-era bankers, industrialists and civil servants, reborn as democrats, soon prospered in the new West Germany. There they worked for a new cause: European economic and political integration.

Is it possible that the Fourth Reich those Nazi industrialists foresaw has, in some part at least, come to pass?

The Red House Report was written by a French spy who was at the meeting in Strasbourg in 1944 – and it paints an extraordinary picture.

The industrialists gathered at the Maison Rouge Hotel waited expectantly as SS Obergruppenfuhrer Dr Scheid began the meeting. Scheid held one of the highest ranks in the SS, equivalent to Lieutenant General. He cut an imposing figure in his tailored grey-green uniform and high, peaked cap with silver braiding. Guards were posted outside and the room had been searched for microphones.

There was a sharp intake of breath as he began to speak. German industry must realise that the war cannot be won, he declared. ‘It must take steps in preparation for a post-war commercial campaign.’ Such defeatist talk was treasonous – enough to earn a visit to the Gestapo’s cellars, followed by a one-way trip to a concentration camp.

But Scheid had been given special licence to speak the truth – the future of the Reich was at stake. He ordered the industrialists to ‘make contacts and alliances with foreign firms, but this must be done individually and without attracting any suspicion’.

The industrialists were to borrow substantial sums from foreign countries after the war.

They were especially to exploit the finances of those German firms that had already been used as fronts for economic penetration abroad, said Scheid, citing the American partners of the steel giant Krupp as well as Zeiss, Leica and the Hamburg-America Line shipping company.

But as most of the industrialists left the meeting, a handful were beckoned into another smaller gathering, presided over by Dr Bosse of the Armaments Ministry. There were secrets to be shared with the elite of the elite.

Bosse explained how, even though the Nazi Party had informed the industrialists that the war was lost, resistance against the Allies would continue until a guarantee of German unity could be obtained. He then laid out the secret three-stage strategy for the Fourth Reich.

In stage one, the industrialists were to ‘prepare themselves to finance the Nazi Party, which would be forced to go underground as a Maquis’, using the term for the French resistance.

Stage two would see the government allocating large sums to German industrialists to establish a ’secure post-war foundation in foreign countries’, while ‘existing financial reserves must be placed at the disposal of the party so that a strong German empire can be created after the defeat’.

In stage three, German businesses would set up a ’sleeper’ network of agents abroad through front companies, which were to be covers for military research and intelligence, until the Nazis returned to power.

‘The existence of these is to be known only by very few people in each industry and by chiefs of the Nazi Party,’ Bosse announced.

‘Each office will have a liaison agent with the party. As soon as the party becomes strong enough to re-establish its control over Germany, the industrialists will be paid for their effort and co-operation by concessions and orders.’

The exported funds were to be channelled through two banks in Zurich, or via agencies in Switzerland which bought property in Switzerland for German concerns, for a five per cent commission.

The Nazis had been covertly sending funds through neutral countries for years.

Swiss banks, in particular the Swiss National Bank, accepted gold looted from the treasuries of Nazi-occupied countries. They accepted assets and property titles taken from Jewish businessmen in Germany and occupied countries, and supplied the foreign currency that the Nazis needed to buy vital war materials.

Swiss economic collaboration with the Nazis had been closely monitored by Allied intelligence.

The Red House Report’s author notes: ‘Previously, exports of capital by German industrialists to neutral countries had to be accomplished rather surreptitiously and by means of special influence.

‘Now the Nazi Party stands behind the industrialists and urges them to save themselves by getting funds outside Germany and at the same time advance the party’s plans for its post-war operations.’

The order to export foreign capital was technically illegal in Nazi Germany, but by the summer of 1944 the law did not matter.

More than two months after D-Day, the Nazis were being squeezed by the Allies from the west and the Soviets from the east. Hitler had been badly wounded in an assassination attempt. The Nazi leadership was nervous, fractious and quarrelling.

During the war years the SS had built up a gigantic economic empire, based on plunder and murder, and they planned to keep it.

A meeting such as that at the Maison Rouge would need the protection of the SS, according to Dr Adam Tooze of Cambridge University, author of Wages of Destruction: The Making And Breaking Of The Nazi Economy.

He says: ‘By 1944 any discussion of post-war planning was banned. It was extremely dangerous to do that in public. But the SS was thinking in the long-term. If you are trying to establish a workable coalition after the war, the only safe place to do it is under the auspices of the apparatus of terror.’

Shrewd SS leaders such as Otto Ohlendorf were already thinking ahead.

As commander of Einsatzgruppe D, which operated on the Eastern Front between 1941 and 1942, Ohlendorf was responsible for the murder of 90,000 men, women and children.

A highly educated, intelligent lawyer and economist, Ohlendorf showed great concern for the psychological welfare of his extermination squad’s gunmen: he ordered that several of them should fire simultaneously at their victims, so as to avoid any feelings of personal responsibility.

By the winter of 1943 he was transferred to the Ministry of Economics. Ohlendorf’s ostensible job was focusing on export trade, but his real priority was preserving the SS’s massive pan-European economic empire after Germany’s defeat.

Full Story

Categories: Crime & Corruption · European Union · Fascism · Global Government · Nazism · New World Order · Social Engineering

Tony Blair earns nearly £400,000 for two 30-minute speeches

April 7, 2009 · 1 Comment

SINGAPORE/

“Politicians are a very strange people”… Former British prime minister and current Middle East Envoy Tony Blair gestures as he delivers a lecture on Faith and Globalisation at the National University in Singapore March 26, 2009. Reuters

Former Prime Minister Tony Blair earned more than £6,000 a minute for giving two half-hour lectures, making him the world’s most expensive public speaker, according to reports.

Telegraph | Apr 5, 2009

by Ian Johnston

Mr Blair, who is thought to have earned more than £15 million since standing down, gave the speeches during a 36-hour visit to the Philippines, where he arrivedby private jet on March 23.

He was paid £182,000 for giving a talk called ‘The Leader as Nation Builder in a Time of Globalisation’, according to Manny Pangilinan, chairman of telecommunications company PLDT, which sponsored the lecture, and is said to have received a similar amount for a a talk entitled ‘The Leader as Principled Negotiator’ in a luxury hotel in Manila later the same day.

“Politics really matters, but a lot of what goes on is not great,” Mr Blair was quoted as telling his audience.

Other remarks included “politicians are a very strange people”, “religion [can be] a source of inspiration or an excuse for evil” and “helping people is a noble profession, but not noble to pursue”.

Mr Pangilinan said the fee for the first speech, which took place at Ateneo de Malina University, was 200,000 euros.

A spokesman for Mr Blair denied the former premiere had requested or received payment in this currency, but would not say whether the cash was paid in pounds sterling or US dollars.

However he added: “He is in great demand for his insight and analysis, which is a tribute to the high esteem in which he is held.”

Mr Blair stayed with the British ambassador during the trip and also had lunch with President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo in the Malacanang Palace, previously home to Ferdinand and Imelda Marcos.

The fees dwarf those offered to even former US presidents such as Bill Clinton and George W Bush. Mr Clinton earned about £100,000 for a speech until cutting back on public speaking after his wife Hillary became US secretary of state. Mr Bush is said to charge a similar amount.

Categories: Crime & Corruption · European Union · Global Government · Globalization · Technocrats

Blair steps up fight to be crowned first ‘President of EU’

April 7, 2009 · 1 Comment

EU-MIDEAST/

Middle East Quartet Representative Tony Blair (L) is received by EU Foreign Policy Chief Javier Solana at the EU Council Headquarters in Brussels April 1, 2009. Reuters

Brown gives grudging blessing to his old rival’s return to new job at centre of the global stage

Independent | Apr 6, 2009

By Jane Merrick

Tony Blair has emerged as the leading candidate to become the first permanent president of the European Union after Gordon Brown gave his grudging blessing to the plan. The former prime minister has stepped up his campaign for the job, which he wants to use to build a bridge between Europe and the new Obama administration.

His return to the global stage would be a shock to his critics over the Iraq war and dismay many in Europe.

But The Independent on Sunday has learnt that Mr Brown has accepted that his old rival should be in pole position for the appointment, on the basis that Britain needs to have a key figure in the architecture of the “new world order”.

A senior British official said: “He [Brown] will have to swallow hard to sit down in meetings once again with Blair. But he accepts that there needs to be someone from the UK in the new global architecture. There is no opposition to the plan. Things have moved on, people have moved on.”

Other European leaders are also broadly supportive because they want a high-profile figure to represent the 27-nation bloc in the new alliance with the US administration. Mr Blair remains a popular figure in the US.

After initially trying to block Mr Blair as a possible candidate last year, the French President, Nicolas Sarkozy, has thrown his weight behind the former prime minister.

As the eyes of the world were on London’s G20 summit last Wednesday, Mr Blair held private talks with the European Commission President José Manuel Barroso in Brussels. The talks focused on his work as Middle East envoy to the quartet of world powers, but it is almost certain that the two men discussed his candidacy. The former premier also visited Sweden last week, where he shared a platform with Bill Clinton at a climate change conference.

The presidency job is dependant on Ireland voting “yes” to the Lisbon Treaty, which creates the position. The Irish referendum will take place in the autumn.

But Mr Blair’s plans could still be scuppered if Angela Merkel loses the German general election in September. She is thought to have a strong desire for the job in the event of defeat.

Britain has already thrown its weight behind Mr Barroso to serve a second term as Commission President. His re-appointment would also strengthen the chances of a British name for the new job.

Mr Blair will have spent two years in the Middle East role by July, giving him a legitimate opportunity to claim he has devoted enough time to the job.

But critics will say Mr Blair has failed to make any significant breakthrough. There is also little chance of progress towards the two-state solution under the new hardline Israeli government led by Binyamin Netanyahu.

In a sign that Mr Blair’s mind is on an exit from the Middle East, he said in Brussels: “I think the next six months will be completely critical in determining whether this process will move forward or whether it will slip back. I do believe that if there is not significant progress in the year 2009, the peace process will be in very great jeopardy, because there are decisions that have to be taken.”

Categories: European Union · Global Government · Technocrats

British military preparing to ‘police the world’ under EU flag

April 4, 2009 · 5 Comments

Now all of our Armed Forces are on offer as part of an EU ‘catalogue’

Daily Mail | Apr 4, 2009

By James Slack and Matthew Hickley

eu_armyBritain is willing to provide all our Armed Forces to fight under the EU flag in future wars, a minister has revealed.

Europe Minister Caroline Flint said that every operational unit of the British Army, the Royal Navy and RAF will be on offer as part of an EU ‘force catalogue’.

This would help form a 60,000-strong, joint EU military reaction force to police the world’s trouble-spots.

Questioned by MPs this week, about Britain’s commitment to the controversial plans, she said: ‘We are prepared to provide all our forces that are suitable for operations within the EU level of action.’

This suggested that the entire Army, Navy and RAF will be put at the EU’s disposal  -  with the likely exception of Trident submarines carrying Britain’s nuclear deterrent missiles.

The Ministry of Defence insists that our forces would remain under UK control.

And Miss Flint immediately stressed that Britain was ‘willing’, but not committed, to offering all the forces  -  and would judge each EU-led operation on a case-bycase basis.

‘They are national forces and will always remain so,’ she said.

However, Tory MP James Clappison, a member of the European Scrutiny Committee, cautioned that her remarks may have

exposed the Government’s real attitude. ‘Under Labour, Britain has an ever-deeper commitment to EU common defence, and many in the EU want a common army,’ he said.

‘Mission creep is in the DNA of the European Union.’

Opposition critics believe that the Government’s rhetoric on European defence is shifting slowly, signalling growing enthusiasm for an EU Army. In October, Defence Secretary John Hutton gave strong backing to French plans for stronger EU military structures, and dismissed opponents of the divisive scheme as ‘pathetic’.

France has championed the Euro-Army agenda for years.

President Nicolas Sarkozy is pushing for a European military headquarters in Brussels, and more EU Rapid Reaction Forces, each made up of 1,500 troops from member states.

And earlier this week, a European parliament report said that British and French military bases around the world, including those in the Falkland Islands, Gibraltar and Cyprus, should be put under joint EU control for future operations.

The MoD has played down the significance of the 60,000-strong intervention force. ‘It is not a standing EU force of any kind and any commitment to an EU-led operation is voluntary,’ a spokesman said.

‘Commitment decisions are for national governments to make on a case by case basis.

‘As you know, we have just one set of military forces and they don’t belong to either Nato or the EU  -  they belong to us  -  and we choose the most appropriate organisation to do the job.’

But opponents of the EU reaction force fear that it will become a major stepping stone towards a huge standing EU army, controlled from Brussels, which would undermine Nato and freeze the U.S. out of Europe’s security affairs.

EU forces have so far carried out only limited missions  -  including peacekeeping in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Congo.

But its supporters hope that the new reaction force would also gradually allow the EU to eclipse Nato, or U.S.-led ‘coalitions of the willing’, in responding to international crises.

Caroline Flint, who oversees Britain’s role in Brussels, faced embarrassment during the committee’s hearings when she admitted that she had never read the Lisbon Treaty, the controversial document which is set to usher in radical reform of the EU.

Conservative defence spokesman Mark Francois described her remarks as an ‘incredible admission’, after she told MPs that she had read ’some of it but not all of it’.

Categories: European Union · Global Government · Militarization · Perpetual War · Police State Dictatorship

Transatlantic EU-US “rift” over global crisis being overplayed

March 24, 2009 · Leave a Comment

G20 summit: EU and US are sparring, not feuding

A much-written-about transatlantic “rift” between Europe and the US on the response to the financial crisis may have been overplayed.

Telegraph | Mar 23, 2009

By Pierre Briançon

Framed in somewhat hackneyed terms, this is the debate: the US wants to focus on stimulus – which Europeans are resisting. And the EU wants to talk about financial regulation – which the US supposedly isn’t that interested in. But in reality the two sides aren’t that far apart.

Ben Bernanke’s speech this week at the Council on Foreign Relations suggests that common ground does exist. By calling for broad reforms and stricter financial regulations – not only in the US, but on a global scale – the Federal Reserve chairman seemed to sing in tune with the French and German leaders, who are trying to place the issue at the top of the April G20 meeting in London.

There are certainly differences of position and perspective. The US, as the largest debtor nation in the world, would like others to help.

Europe – some tend to forget – is a common market bound by a common currency, but not an economic policy decision centre. European leaders fear that talking mostly about the stimulus at the G20 would squander an opportunity to address the deep-rooted causes of the crisis. And some in the US feel that Europe should get a better sense of urgency about the recession.

But American decision-makers recognize that better regulation is crucial and necessarily global while European leaders are sensitive to the daily flow of dismal figures, followed by other terrible numbers showing the recession is worse than thought. They can’t simply wait for the distant results expected from their stimulus plans. In any case, everyone is trying out the same basic remedies: aggressive monetary and fiscal policies, support for the financial system, and a few doses of populism

The US and Europe should recognize that they have plenty of common ground. Then they could take the G20 meeting seriously, work on concrete proposals and forget about scoring political points. This shouldn’t be too much to ask. Adversarial rhetoric is risky, especially in a crisis.

Categories: Economic Meltdown · European Union · Financial Scandals · Hegelian Dialectic · Phony US/EU 'Rift' · Transatlantic Union · Wealth Redistribution

Maoist-style agricultural work brigades planned for low-level EU bureaucrats

March 23, 2009 · 1 Comment

mao-zedong

Whiff of Mao as 1,200 EU staff told ‘muck in’ – down on the farm

Guardian | Mar 20, 2009

by David Gow in Brussels

Mariann Fischer Boel, the EU agriculture commissioner, is now a self-avowed Maoist: she has come up with a scheme to send her 1,200 officials down on the farm for a spot of “harvest experience”, a plan reminiscent of Chinese students’ obligations during the 60s cultural revolution of Chairman Mao.

Boel, who owns three farms in her native Denmark with her husband, said that a bout of “mucking out the pigs” would be good hands-on training for eurocrats dealing with the minutiae of the common agricultural policy.

Her idea, presented this week to commissioners, including the ex-Maoist commission president, José Manuel Barroso, has set emails humming throughout the Berlaymont building in Brussels. The buzz among the commission’s 33,600 staff is of how they can get in on the act and escape the empty, echoing corridors of HQ.

Other departments are already discussing copycat schemes, perhaps with tongue slightly in cheek. Officials in the justice directorate-generate might not be enthusiastic about spending a couple of weeks as a prison guard, but fisheries functionaries could find a spell on a trawler a change of scene.

Boel, a centre-right politician back home, said of her scheme: “What better way to ensure that the people managing farm policy are sensitive to the needs of the farmers?”

Her aides, many of them brought up on farms themselves, said that the scheme was just at the planning stage – and it would be entirely voluntary.

Categories: Communism · European Union

David René James de Rothschild warns that global crisis will leave governments with enormous public debt

March 19, 2009 · 1 Comment

david_rothschild

David René James de Rothschild delivered a lecture on global crisis

He warned that the crisis will leave the governments’ coffers with enormous public debt.

EMportal | Mar 19, 2009

As far as the countries of Southeast Europe are concerned, Rothschild said that they are going to overcome today’s financial difficulties and continue to develop, emphasising the strategic importance of Greece’s investments in the region.

World renowned French banker and Chairmanof the Rothschild Group, David René James de Rothschild delivered a lecture titled “What Economic Crisis Teaches Us” on March 16, as part of the Megaron Plus series of events hosted by the Athens Concert Hall.

David de Rothschild estimated that the global economic crisis will come to an end in 2010.

He also stressed that the first signs of recovery will be stock markets rising, but he warned that the crisis will leave the governments’ coffers with enormous public debt.

As far as the countries of Southeast Europe are concerned, Rothschild said that they are going to overcome today’s financial difficulties and continue to develop, emphasising the strategic importance of Greece’s investments in the region.

On the occasion of his visit in Athens, David de Rothschild also had a meeting with Prime Minister Kostas Karamanlis.

_______

Related

Baron David de Rothschild sees a New World Order in global banking governance

Despite economic meltdown, Rothschild posts record profits

Rothschild pays out record bonuses to staff

Categories: Economic Meltdown · European Union · Financial Scandals · Order Out Of Chaos