Aftermath News

Entries categorized as ‘Monopolies’

Google’s master plan for total world domination

July 9, 2007 · No Comments

Master Plan for total control - About the power of Google (a short film by Ozan Halici and Jurgen Mayer)

Dominating data storage. Dominating marketing. Total monopoly on information. Collecting all of your emails and personal information to be stored and accessed by anyone anytime, in perpetuity. Google is secretly creating full-spectrum dossiers on all users for the CIA and much, much more that they don’t like to talk about. The last time dossiers were compiled on individuals, millions died.

Now they are at it again.

“Don’t Be Evil”??

Don’t believe them.

Based in part on the book, “The Google Story” by David A. Vise

To download the movie
http://masterplanthemovie.com/

Related

Google to create most comprehensive database of personal information ever assembled

Categories: Big Brother Surveillance Society · Monopolies · Social Engineering

The Future of Food: The disturbing truth behind genetically engineered foods

June 25, 2007 · No Comments

The Future of Food

THE FUTURE OF FOOD offers an in-depth investigation into the disturbing truth behind the unlabeled, patented, genetically engineered foods that have quietly filled U.S. grocery store shelves for the past decade.

THE FUTURE OF FOOD - Part 1

THE FUTURE OF FOOD: Part 1-7
http://gmo.worldwidewarning.net/www/archives/75

Categories: Big Agribiz · Biotech · Bioweapons · Crime & Corruption · Environment · Food Safety · Health & Fitness · Monopolies · Sci-Tech · Social Degeneration · Social Engineering

Scandal of the Century Rocks British Crown and the City

June 18, 2007 · 5 Comments

Mathaba | Jun 16, 2007

An EIR preliminary investigation into the scandal has uncovered a story that will send shock waves through the City of London financial circles, as well as top figures within the British monarchy, who are all implicated in a scheme that goes to the very heart of global finance, which is now on its last legs.

The Saudis have forged a crucial partnership with the Anglo-Dutch financial oligarchy, headquartered in the City of London, and protected by the British Crown. They have, in league with BAE Systems, Royal Dutch Shell, British Petroleum, and other City giants, established a private, offshore, hidden financial concentration that would have made the British East India Company managers of an earlier heyday of the British Empire, drool with envy.
 
by Jeffrey Steinberg

On Wednesday, June 6, the British Broadcasting Corporation aired a sensational story, revealing that the British arms manufacturer BAE Systems, had paid more than $2 billion in bribes to Saudi Arabia’s national security chief and longtime Ambassador in Washington, Prince Bandar bin-Sultan, over a 22 year period. The BBC revelations were further detailed on June 11, in a one-hour Panorama TV documentary, provocatively titled “Princes, Planes and Pay-offs,” which detailed a more than decade-long probe by the Guardian, BBC, and the British Serious Fraud Office (SFO), into the Al-Yamamah arms contract, a nearly $80 billion, 22-year long deal between BAE Systems and the Saudi government, in which British-made fighter jets and support services were provided to the Saudi Kingdom, beginning in 1985.

Every British government, from Margaret Thatcher, through John Major, to Tony Blair, has been thoroughly implicated in the BAE-Saudi scandal. In December 2006, Britain’s Attorney General, Lord Goldsmith, ordered the SFO probe shut, declaring that any further investigation would gravely jeopardize British national security. Prime Minister Blair fully backed his Attorney General, and is now scrambling to complete the fourth phase of the Al-Yamamah deal before he leaves office next month.

The furor that followed the Goldsmith announcement triggered a number of international investigations into the BAE Systems scandal, including by the Swiss government and the OECD (Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development, the so-called “rich nations” club). More recently, the U.S. Department of Justice has reportedly opened a probe into money laundering and possible violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, on the part of the British and the Saudis. The estimated $2 billion in cumulative payoffs to Prince Bandar, for his role in brokering the Al-Yamamah deal, went through the Saudi government accounts at Riggs Bank in Washington, D.C., thus opening the U.S. jurisdiction.

While the various British investigations into the Al-Yamamah (Arabic for “the dove”) arms deal did unearth a vast network of front companies, offshore shells, and corrupt politicians, who benefited richly from the deal, Executive Intelligence Review’s (EIR’s) own preliminary investigation into the scandal has uncovered a far more significant story, one that will send shock waves through the City of London financial circles, as well as top figures within the British monarchy, who are all implicated in a far bigger scheme that goes to the very heart of the Venetian-modeled Anglo-Dutch Liberal system of global finance, which is now on its last legs.

AL-YAMAMAH

In 1985, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, in part frightened by the ongoing war between its neighbors Iran and Iraq, which had reached a highly destructive phase known as the “war of the cities,” sought to purchase large numbers of advanced fighter jets to build up their Royal Air Force. Initially, the Saudis sought approval from the Reagan Administration to purchase American-made F-15 fighters. The Saudi F-15 deal required Congressional approval, and the America Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) waged a massive effort to kill the sale. According to several well-informed Washington sources, Howard Teicher, a senior official on the Reagan National Security Council (director of Near East and South Asia, 1982-1985; senior director, Politico-Military Affairs, 1986-1987), also played a pivotal role in the AIPAC effort, which ultimately succeeded in killing the deal. Teicher, according to the sources, withheld information from Reagan, stalling a Congressional vote until AIPAC had fully mobilized, and then convinced the President to withdraw the request, rather than face an embarrassing defeat in the Congress.

Other sources have offered a slightly different version of the failure of the F-15 deal, claiming that intelligence community estimates, since the mid-1970s, had warned of instability in the Persian Gulf, and that there were, therefore, other reasons to question the advisability of the sales of advanced U.S. military technology to Saudi Arabia, particularly after the Khomeini Revolution in Iran.

Whatever the reason, the F-15 deal failed. The very next day, after the Reagan Administration threw in the towel, Prince Bandar, the Kingdom’s de facto chief diplomat to Britain, the Soviet Union, and China, as well as the U.S.A., flew to London to meet with Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. British arms sales did not require parliamentary approval, and the British government, in 1966, had created an agency, the Defence Export Services Organization (DESO), to hawk British arms around the globe. BAE Systems had been created in 1981, when Thatcher privatized the British arms manufacturing industry, which had, only four years earlier, been nationalized under the Labour government. And BAE Systems, the largest arms manufacturer in Europe, dominates the British defense sector.

The Bandar trip to London to confer with Thatcher had been in the works for months. A Ministry of Defence briefing paper, prepared for the Thatcher-Bandar sessions, stated, “Since early 1984, intensive efforts have been made to sell Tornado and Hawk to the Saudis. When, in the Autumn of 1984, they seemed to be leaning towards French Mirage fighters, Mr Heseltine paid an urgent visit to Saudi Arabia, carrying a letter from the Prime Minister to King Fahd. In December 1984, the Prime Minister started a series of important negotiations by meeting Prince Bandar, the son of Prince Sultan…. The Prime Minister met the King in Riyahd in April this year and in August the King wrote to her stating his decision to buy 48 Tornado IDS and 30 Hawk.”

Thatcher also had every reason to feel confident that Bandar would be the perfect interlocutor between Saudi Arabia and Great Britain in the deal of the century. At age 16, several years after his father, Prince Sultan, had been named Minister of Defense of the Kingdom, the Prince was sent to England to study at the Royal Air Force College Cranwell, the elite officer’s training school for future RAF pilots. At least one senior American intelligence official has reported widespread rumors that Bandar was recruited by MI6, the British Secret Intelligence Service, before he finished his RAF training. Other sources, intimately familiar with the goings-on at BAE Systems, report that the “private” aerospace giant has a sales force made up almost exclusively of “lads” recruited to MI6 before their hires.

Whether or not these reports are accurate, Bandar certainly is a serious Anglophile. The best accounts of his adventures in England appear in the 2006 book, The Prince—The Secret Story of the World’s Most Intriguing Royal (HarperCollins, New York), by William Simpson, a Cranwell classmate, and still-intimate pal of the Prince. Simpson, who wrote the book with the full cooperation of Bandar, recounted his friend’s intimate ties with every occupant of 10 Downing Street.

“In London,” Simpson reported, “Bandar would breeze into Number Ten with uninhibited panache. From Margaret Thatcher to John Major to Tony Blair, Bandar’s access was extraordinary.” By Prince Bandar’s own account to Simpson about Al-Yamamah, “When we first made the agreement, we had no contract. It was a handshake between me and Mrs. Thatcher in Ten Downing Street.” It was months before the final details of the Al-Yamamah deal were finalized, and the contracts signed. But even before the ink had dried, Britain had provided the initial delivery of Tornado jets—from the inventory of the RAF.

By the time the formal Memorandum of Understanding was signed between the British and Saudi defense ministers on Sept. 25, 1985, the original order had been expanded to 72 Tornado fighter jets and 30 Hawk training aircraft, along with other equipment and services. There have been two subsequent deals, Al-Yamamah II and III, and Al-Yamamah IV, worth as much as $40 billion in additional arms deliveries, is in the final stages.

OIL-FOR-AIRCRAFT

The Al-Yamamah deal was structured as a barter arrangement. While the Saudis did agree to pay cash for certain services and infrastructure construction under separate sub-contracts—and those cash payments went, in part, to “consulting fees” or bribes, including the $2 billion to Prince Bandar’s accounts at Riggs Bank, and similar reported payments to the Chilean dictator Gen. Augusto Pinochet and the Dutch Royal Consort, Prince Bernhard—the essential contract involved the Saudi delivery of oil to Britain, in return for the fighter jets.

And here is where the story gets really interesting.

Saudi Arabia agreed to provide Britain with one tanker of oil per day, for the entire life of the Al-Yamanah contracts. An oil tanker holds approximately 600,000 barrels of oil. BAE Systems began “official” delivery of the Toronado and Hawk planes to Saudi Arabia in 1989. BAE Systems now has approximately 5,000 employees inside Saudi Arabia, servicing the contract.

Is it possible to place a cash value on the oil deliveries to BAE Systems? According to sources familiar with the inner workings of Al-Yamamah, much of the Saudi oil was sold on the international spot market at market value, through British Petroleum and Royal Dutch Shell.

EIR economist John Hoefle has done an in-depth charting of the financial features of the oil transactions, based on BP’s own daily tracking of world oil prices on the open market. Using BP’s average annual cost of a barrel of Saudi crude oil, Hoefle concluded that the total value of the oil sales, based on the value of the dollar at the time of delivery, was $125 billion. In current U.S. dollar terms, that total soars to $160 billion.

Based on the best available public records, the total sticker price on the military equipment and services provided by BAE Systems to Saudi Arabia, over the 22-year period to date, was approximately $80 billion. And those figures are inflated by billions of dollars in slush fund payouts. Indeed, the latest limited-damage scandal around Al-Yamamah erupted in November 2006, when a Ministry of Defence document leaked out, providing the actual sticker price on the fighter jets. The figure confirmed the long-held suspicion that the prices of the jets had been jacked up by at least 40%.

BAE Systems, a crown jewel in the City of London financial/industrial structure, secured somewhere in the range of $80 billion in net profit from the arrangement—in league with BP and Royal Dutch Shell! Where did that money go, and what kinds of activities were financed with it? The answer to those questions, sources emphasize, holds the key to the power of Anglo-Dutch finance in the world today.

Prince Bandar’s biographer and friend William Simpson certainly provided an insight into the inner workings of the Al-Yamamah project:

“Although Al-Yamamah constitutes a highly unconventional way of doing business, its lucrative spin-offs are the by-product of a wholly political objective: a Saudi political objective and a British political objective. Al-Yamamah is, first and foremost, a political contract. Negotiated at the height of the Cold War, its unique structure has enabled the Saudis to purchase weapons from around the globe to fund the fight against Communism. Al-Yamamah money can be found in the clandestine purchase of Russian ordnance used in the expulsion of Qaddafi’s troops from Chad. It can also be traced to arms bought from Egypt and other countries, and sent to the Mujahideen in Afghanistan fighting the Soviet occupying forces.”

In effect, Prince Bandar’s biographer confirms that Al-Yamamah is the biggest pool of clandestine cash in history—protected by Her Majesty’s Official Secrets Act and the even more impenetrable finances of the City of London and the offshore, unregulated financial havens under British dominion.

THE SAUDI SIDE OF THE STREET

For its part, the Saudi Royal Family did not exactly get ripped off in the Al-Yamamah deal. When the contract was signed in 1985, according to sources familiar with the arrangement, Saudi Arabia got an exemption from the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). The barter deal with BAE Systems did not come under their OPEC production quota. In other words, Saudi Arabia got OPEC approval to produce 600,000 barrels a day, above the OPEC ceiling, to make the arms purchases.

According to the Energy Information Administration, a branch of the U.S. Department of Energy, over the life of the Al-Yamamah program, the average cost of a Saudi barrel of crude oil, delivered to tankers, was under $5 a barrel. At that price, the annual cost to the Saudis for the 600,000 barrels per day was $1.1 billion. Over the duration of the contract to date, the cost to the Saudis of the daily oil shipments was approximately $24.6 billion. The commercial value, in current dollars, as noted above, was $160 billion.

The Saudis have forged a crucial partnership with the Anglo-Dutch financial oligarchy, headquartered in the City of London, and protected by the British Crown. They have, in league with BAE Systems, Royal Dutch Shell, British Petroleum, and other City giants, established a private, offshore, hidden financial concentration that would have made the British East India Company managers of an earlier heyday of the British Empire, drool with envy.

At this moment, there is no way of calculating how much of that slush fund has been devoted to the clandestine wars and Anglo-American covert operations of the past two decades. Nor is it possible to estimate the multiplier effect of portions of those undisclosed, and unregulated funds having passed through the hedge funds of the Cayman Islands, the Isle of Man, Gibraltar, Panama, and Switzerland.

What is clear, is that the BAE Systems scandal goes far beyond the $2 billion that allegedly found its way into the pockets of Prince Bandar. It is a scandal that goes to the heart of the power of Anglo-Dutch finance.

There is much, much more to unearth, now that the door has been slightly opened into what already appears to be the swindle of the century.  

Categories: Big Oil · Crime & Corruption · Economic Meltdown · Global Government · Monopolies · Neofeudalism · Organized Crime · Perpetual War

Britain is now a one-party state

March 17, 2007 · No Comments

Daily Mail | Mar 16, 2007

dear_leaders

Consensus politics: Sir Menzies Campbell, Tony Blair and David Cameron have lost touch with the voters

It is variously called Fake Opposition, Good Cop/Bad Cop, Divide and Conquer and Double-Teaming. It is also called Social Engineering and Neofeudalist Tyranny. It is just bad guys in power deceiving, terrorizing, robbing, raping and pillaging, the same as it has been for thousands of years. Ah, but with a twist: the people are led to believe that they are free when the opposite is true. And this is the rule in both America and the UK. Rule by Secrecy, that is.

There is no real political choice because the system is rigged by the real powers that manipulate behind the scenes. Face it, these politicians are all bought off and only a massive awakening can change that. As it stands, people are just too fixated, hypnotized, demoralized, corrupted, ignorant and cowardly to face the truth. So they will just keep getting more of the same until they wake up, start resisting and taking their power back.

It is simple as that.

PW

The political class is, in fact, united around Sir Hayden’s central idea: namely that taxpayers will be forced to contribute some £ 25million a year to the upkeep and maintenance of British political parties. Of course, all experience suggests that this £25million will merely be a first instalment, and it won’t be long before we will be asked to contribute a great deal more.

Over recent years, it has become increasingly obvious that the labels ‘Conservative’ and ‘Labour’ have ceased to have any distinct meanings.

These once great political parties no longer represent different values, and their claim to stand in opposition to each other has become false.

The truth is that they now fundamentally agree on almost every one of the great issues of our time: foreign policy, the role of the state, the level of taxation and so forth. Where there still are disagreements, these tend to be artificial and largely rhetorical.

Categories: Crime & Corruption · Hegelian Dialectic · Mind Control · Monopolies · Neofeudalism · Social Engineering · Socialism

“Negative calorie” ‘Enviga’ soda falsely advertised, may make people fatter

March 16, 2007 · 1 Comment

News Target | Mar 9, 2007

A new soda claiming it reduces calories was doubted to be effective upon its official release in October 2006, and now a public nutrition and health advocacy group is suing over false advertising. The soda is called Enviga, a caffeinated green tea-flavored soda conceived jointly between Coca-Cola Co. and Nestlé S.A. of Switzerland.

When launched, Coca-Cola called it “the drink proven to burn calories” in an October 11, 2006 press release. Drinking three cans will let you lose 60 to 100 calories, the companies said. However, at the time, no publicly available evidence supported these claims; the first public release of the clinical study done by Nestlé was published February 2 as a partially paid advertisement in the journal Obesity.

Enter the non-profit Center for Science in the Public Interest.

On February 1, the CSPI filed suit against the pair of beverage kings in U.S. District Court in New Jersey, stating that the companies made the claims without adequate facts to back them up. The lawsuit questions the three-day research study used - which utilized 31 test subjects aged 18 to 35, all with a healthy body mass index - and its results.

Discussing the results of the clinical study, the CPSI said in a press release, “Most expended slightly more calories after drinking Enviga, but Coca-Cola and Nestlé didn’t disclose publicly that the drink’s ingredients had the opposite effect in a significant number of the study participants” - equaling six people, or almost one-fifth of the study group.

“These mass-marketed negative-calorie beverages are a nutritional joke,” said consumer health advocate Mike Adams, author of The Five Soft Drink Monsters, a book that teaches people how to cut out soda from their diet. “In my opinion, it’s all a clever marketing ploy, backed by junk science, designed to sell consumers false hope for weight loss through unhealthful, high-profit beverages that are dangerously acidic due to their phosphoric acid content.”

Categories: Crime & Corruption · Health & Fitness · Monopolies · Social Engineering

Mexico’s Carlos Slim may overtake U.S. billionaires

March 14, 2007 · No Comments

Houston Chronicle | Mar 13, 2007 

carlos-slim

Some in Mexico resent him as he approaches wealth of Gates, Buffett

His success inspires anger among Mexicans who resent the concentration of wealth in the hands of the nation’s relatively tiny elite.

The world’s third-richest man, Carlos Slim, is gaining rapidly on Bill Gates and Warren Buffet with a fortune that grew $19 billion last year — the largest wealth gain in the past decade tracked by Forbes magazine.

It’s also a sign of the wealth gap in Mexico’s monopoly-laden economy.

Since Slim bought the telephone monopoly in a 1991 privatization, he’s used Telmex as a cash cow to build an empire that includes Latin America’s largest mobile phone company; provides banking, brokerage and Internet services; sells insurance and oil industry equipment; and operates retail stores and restaurants.

To many Mexicans, who make Slim richer with nearly every phone call or trip to the mall, his rise shows their businessmen can run world-class companies. He’s widely praised for turning Telmex — once notorious for taking months or years to install a phone line — into a modern, professional operation.

But he also has kept phone rates high in a country where the minimum wage is about 50 cents an hour, and his success inspires anger among Mexicans who resent the concentration of wealth in the hands of the nation’s relatively tiny elite.

Living on $2 a day

“Why should we want a few people to hoard all the wealth, if the majority of Mexicans don’t have enough to eat and 30 million Mexicans live on less than 22 pesos ($2) a day?” thundered former leftist presidential candidate Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador after Slim’s jump to No. 3 on Forbes’ list of billionaires announced last week.

Now worth an estimated $49 billion, the 67-year-old Slim is the son of a Lebanese father who built a small family fortune from retailing.

An entrenched elite

New President Felipe Calderon has promised to battle monopolistic practices, but past efforts to do that have been thwarted by Mexico’s entrenched elite.

Slim faces a potential challenge in the telecom sector from the Televisa network, which controls about 70 percent of Mexico’s broadcast market and is looking to extend its dominance in emerging communications systems that integrate telephone, television and Internet transmissions.

“This could be a destabilizing factor. It could readjust the players on the chess board,” said Celso Garrido, an economics professor at the National Autonomous University of Mexico.

But even there, Slim stands to gain — his fortune includes shares in Televisa and one of his sons sits on Televisa’s board.

Slim is on track to overtake the two leading Americans on the billionaires list, particularly since Buffet ($52 billion), who made his money running the Berkshire Hathaway investment fund, and Gates ($56 billion), who founded Microsoft Corp., are more focused these days on giving their fortunes away.

Gates, who set up the world’s richest charity foundation, has said he believes “that with great wealth comes great responsibility, a responsibility to give back to society.” Buffett joined in last year, promising to send about $1.5 billion every year to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which has an endowment of $33 billion.

Slim was reportedly ready to announce new philanthropy of his own. Telmex already sponsors a foundation that supports education and social programs in Mexico, and the billionaire’s investments in Mexico City’s downtown led to urban renewal in the central zone.

Slim told local media last year that he planned to give between $2.5 billion and $4 billion of his fortune.

But he is still expanding an increasingly diversified empire that now involves his three sons, and he doesn’t appear ready to focus on philanthropy.

Categories: Crime & Corruption · Economic Meltdown · Monopolies

Cashless society by 2012, says Visa chief

March 13, 2007 · 5 Comments

Independent | Mar 12, 2007  

Paying for goods with notes and coins could be consigned to history within five years, according to the chief executive of Visa Europe.

Peter Ayliffe said that, by 2012, using credit and debit cards should be cheaper and more convenient than cash.

Some retailers could soon start surcharging customers if they choose to buy products with cash, because of the greater cost of processing these payments, he warned.

Visa Europe briefed the British Retail Consortium last month on new “contactless” cards that can be waved in front of a scanner to make small payments.

However, the consortium dismissed this vision and claimed that card processing fees, which regulators are investigating, are still too high.

One member of the consurtium said that the estimated “interchange” fee charged to retailers amounts to some 4p for each transaction.

Nick Mourant, treasurer at Tesco, said: “There is a duopoly between Mastercard and Visa in the UK. Their setting of fees is anti-competitive.”

Categories: Cashless Society · Economic Meltdown · Monopolies · Neofeudalism · Social Engineering

The Hidden Agenda: Merging America into World Government

February 18, 2007 · 3 Comments

Google Video 

“The ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down… but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.”

- Richard Gardner, Former U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, Trilateralist and CFR member in “The Hard Road to World Order” published in the CFR’s Foreign Affairs, April, 1974.

This interview took place shortly before Norman Dodd’s death. He is obviously advanced in age and appears tired and care-worn. But behind that, you get the sense that this patriot went through a radically life-changing experience, and is heart-broken to know the truth about how the rich and powerful have so thoroughly deceived the people on every level and corrupted the country he loved and cherished. He himself admits, “It is a very rough experience…to encounter proof of this kind.”

The conclusion of this interview is that Communism was invented, instigated, fomented and funded by the super-rich Capitalists to set up a global economic and political monopoly that would enslave all humanity. Controlling education would enable them to guide this process by brainwashing the youth into accepting this slavery and hating freedom and independence. Today, you will find that the average student believes that global warming is a real emergency that can only be rectified by globalism and global government. They have been trained to be eco-communists/fascists who put the value of the earth itself high above humanity and therefore are accepting of the ideas of deindustrialization, population control, wealth redistribution, social engineering and central planning. They have been conditioned to believe that concepts of freedom, privacy, private property and sovereignty are passe’ and of the past. They have been sucked into the anti-war movement by the very people who have been starting the wars in the first place and so accept the “solution” of global government.

They now look forward to a future where we will live in a hyper-collectivism without any freedom, privacy, private property or sovereignty. Instead, they believe there is nothing wrong with entering into a Hive-mind matrix of collective consciousness. They feel they are “pioneers”, eager to be hooked up to a central computer system via brain-chips that will both program their minds and track them everywhere they go in a surveillance-society control grid.

I could go on, but this is the basic reality we are facing today, all because the elite’s foundations have manipulated education for their own benefit. I hope every student in America can take a look at this and question their own programming, hopefully emerging with a better sense of reality.

PW

EXCERPTS:

We are now at the year nineteen hundred and eight, which was the year that the Carnegie Foundation began operations.  And, in that year, the trustees meeting, for the first time, raised a specific question, which they discussed throughout the balance of the year, in a very learned fashion.  And the question is this:  Is there any means known more effective than war, assuming you wish to alter the life of an entire people?  And they conclude that, no more effective means to that end is known to humanity, than war.  So then, in 1909, they raise the second question, and discuss it, namely, how do we involve the United States in a war?

And, before I could think of how I would reply to that statement, Mr. Gaither then went on, and voluntarily stated, “Mr. Dodd, all of us who have a hand in the making of policies here, have had experience either with the OSS during the war, or with European economic administration after the war.  We have had experience operating under directives.  The directives emanate, and did emanate, from the White House.  Now, we still operate under just such directives.  Would you like to know what the substance of these directives is?”

I said, “Yes, Mr. Gaither, I would like very much to know.”  Whereupon, he made this statement to me, “Mr. Dodd, we are here to operate in response to similar directives, the substance of which is that we shall use our grant-making power so to alter life in the United States, that it can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.”

Well, parenthetically, Mr. Griffin, I nearly fell off the chair.  I, of course, didn’t, but my response to Mr. Gaither then was, “Oh, Mr. Gaither, I can now answer your first question.  You’ve forced the Congress of the United States to spend a hundred and fifty thousand dollars to find our what you have just told me.”  I said, “Of course, legally, you’re entitled to make grants for this purpose.  But, I don’t think you’re entitled to withhold that information from the People of this country, to whom you’re indebted for your tax exemption.  So why don’t you tell the People of the country just what you told me?”  And his answer was, “We would not think of doing any such thing.”

Yeah, I might tell you this experience, as far as its impact on Kathryn Casey is concerned.  Well, she was never able to return to her law practice.  If it hadn’t been for Carroll Reece’s ability to tuck her away in a job with the Federal Trade Commission, I don’t know what would have happened to Kathryn.  Ultimately, she lost her mind as a result of it.  It was a terrible shock to her.  It is a very rough experience for her to encounter proof of this kind.

Their motivation was, well, let’s take Mr. Carnegie, as an example.  His publicly declared and steadfast interest was to counteract the departure of the colonies from Great Britain.  He was devoted just to putting the pieces back together again.

Griffin:  Why do the foundations generously support communist causes in the United States?

Dodd:  Well, because, to them, communism represents a means of developing what we call a monopoly — as the organization, we’ll say, of large-scale industry into an administrable unit.

Griffin:  Do they think that they will?

Dodd:  They will be the beneficiary of it, yes.

The Hidden Agenda: Merging America into World Government  - G. Edward Griffin’s classic 1982 interview with Norman Dodd director of research for the Reece Committee which uncovered covert globalist manipulation by the major foundations (Carnegie, Ford, Rockefeller etc) to control education, to incrementally indoctrinate students into globalism and away from nationalism and to intentionally involve the United States in World War I which was to be prolonged to suit this long-term agenda. The ultimate long-term aim being to create a global goverment merging the US with the USSR by stealth, an “end run around sovereignty” as Richard Gardner put it.

RELATED

“Transcript of Norman Dodd Interview”  with G. Edward Griffin 1982
http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/dodd/interview.htm

TAX-EXEMPT SUBVERSION
Congressman B. Carroll Reece
American Mercury (July 1957)

[Congressman Reece oversaw the hearings in 1953 of a special House Committee. The hearings were published in 1954: Tax-Exempt Foundations: Hearings Before the Special Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations and Comparable Organizations, House of Representatives, Eighty-Third Congress, Second Session.

Tax-exempt philanthropic foundations clearly have become one principle source of Communist influence infiltration and subversion in the United States. Inquiry by four committees of Congress since 1952 has demonstrated beyond all question that eleemosynary foundations – however laudably described in their charters – are accountable in history for all their works.

As one promising approach, the Senate Internal Security subcommittee (of the Committee on the Judiciary) recommended on February 28, 1957, that Congress withdraw the tax-exempt status from any organization “contributing funds to a Communist or Communist-front organization, or for Communist purposes.” Such a law would apply to all foundations those definitions already established in the Federal Code by the Subversive Activities Control Act. Tax-exempt foundations then would be subject to citation by the SACB whenever their operations were determined to he tainted by Communist inspiration, purpose, or direction.

This type of legislation would not touch reputable and law-abiding foundations. But where the hearing disclosed financial support of Kremlin programs, a foundation’s tax-exempt status would be terminated automatically. This would fix a due-process death sentence upon subversive foundations.
http://www.garynorth.com/Reece%20Report%20(1957).pdf

Categories: Communism · Crime & Corruption · Economic Meltdown · Global Government · Hegelian Dialectic · Mind Control · Monopolies · Perpetual War · Social Engineering · Socialism

CHINA’S MASSIVE PORT GRAB

January 9, 2007 · No Comments

American Free Press | Jan 6, 2007 

Communists Positioning China To Dominate Trade in Americas

American Free Press has confirmed that the huge Chinese shipping conglomerate Hutchison Whampoa Ltd. has a significant presence at the Lazaro Cardenas seaport in Mexico, as well as other Mexican ports. The company has had effective control of both ends of the Panama Canal for the last seven years.

The Mexican ports link to the budding Trans Texas Corridor (TTC) toll road network by way of railroad cargo lines that head from the ports across Mexico to the United States border, providing a conduit to bypass U.S. West Coast seaports and haul ever-more massive quantities of imports into the United States.

The TTC is part of a planned vast network of tollways that, unless derailed by a growing number of concerned citizens, will ripple through many parts of the United States, functioning as a delivery network for goods flooding into the United States from foreign factories, although it appears U.S.-made goods would be exported via the same system.

Hutchison Whampoa’s Pacific Port at Lazaro Cardenas, located in the Mexican state of Michoacan, is especially significant. As reported by AFP on Dec. 18, 2006, officials from Lazaro Cardenas met in March 2006 with Kansas City, Mo., officials to sign “an historic cooperative trade agreement to establish a new trans-Pacific trade corridor that will alleviate delays and congestion at [U.S.] West Coast ports.”

This is another way of saying that at least part of the stream of imported merchandise flowing into those West Coast ports such as the one in Long Beach, Calif., could be redirected to the Cardenas port so these goods can be hauled into the United States with even greater efficiency.

Categories: Communism · Economic Meltdown · Global Government · Monopolies · Social Engineering

Red star over Wal-Mart

December 21, 2006 · No Comments

KansasCity.com  | Dec 19, 2006 

Wal-Mart workers in China now have their own Communist Party branch. 
 
Employees at Wal-Mart’s China headquarters have set up a Communist Party branch, the company and party said Monday. The move comes amid a campaign to expand the ruling party’s presence in foreign companies.

The action follows the success of China’s state-sanctioned labor body this year in setting up unions at the U.S. retailer’s outlets. Wal-Mart is one of China’s biggest and most prominent foreign employers, with a work force of 36,000 and 68 stores.

The party branch was set up Friday at Wal-Mart headquarters in the southern city of Shenzhen, according to the party newspaper People’s Daily and a Wal-Mart spokesman, Jonathan Dong.

Dong said he didn’t know whether Wal-Mart would have any formal interaction with the branch or whether its establishment would affect operations. Employees who answered the phone at the party’s Shenzhen office said they had no information on what the branch at the headquarters would do.

China’s 70-million-member Communist Party and its affiliated All-China Federation of Trade Unions have announced a target of setting up unions at 60 percent of China’s 150,000 foreign companies by the end of this year.

Categories: Communism · Monopolies