“The general philosophy of UNESCO should be a scientific world humanism, global in extent and evolutionary in background…its education program it can stress the ultimate need for world political unity and familiarize all peoples with the implications of the transfer of full sovereignty from separate nations to a world organization. Political unification in some sort of world government will be required. Tasks for the media division of UNESCO [will be] to promote the growth of a common outlook shared by all nations and cultures to help the emergence of a single world culture.
Even though it is quite true that any radical EUGENIC policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the EUGENIC problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”
– Julian Huxley, brother of Aldous Huxley, founding director-general of UNESCO (1946-48) in “UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy”, 1948
Mr Giscard d’Estaing says the treaty is “impenetrable for the public”
The new EU Reform Treaty is effectively the same as the constitution it was designed to replace, according to a leading architect of the constitution.
The treaty differs from the abandoned constitution in “approach rather than content”, says former French President Valery Giscard d’Estaing.
Mr Giscard d’Estaing led a committee drafting the constitution, rejected by French and Dutch voters in 2004.
Several European governments hope to avoid a referendum on the new treaty.
In an article in the UK newspaper, The Independent, Mr Giscard d’Estaing says the treaty makes important concessions to the UK.
The UK, alongside Denmark and The Netherlands, is among the countries whose governments oppose a referendum.
Mr Giscard d’Estaing points out that the UK will not be bound by the treaty’s rules on human rights and judicial harmonisation, and would retain the right to “duck in and out of the system as it pleases”.
British Euro-sceptics want the government to hold a referendum on the treaty, arguing it is no different to the constitution.
However, the government of Prime Minister Gordon Brown wants the treaty to be passed by parliament alone.
‘Impenetrable’
Mr Giscard d’Estaing says the “proposed institutional reforms” of the rejected constitution can still be found in the new treaty.
The authors of the new treaty, he says, have taken the original draft constitution and “blown it apart into separate elements”.
They have then “re-attached them, one by one, to existing treaties”.
Changes to the original constitution – such as jettisoning references to a European flag and anthem – were made to “head off any threat of referenda”, Mr Giscard d’Estaing says.
The EU Reform Treaty was agreed earlier this month at a summit in Lisbon, Portugal.
The document aims to streamline decision-making within an enlarged EU of 27 member nations.
It was written to replace an EU draft constitution that was overwhelmingly rejected by French and Dutch voters in 2004.
In his article for The Independent, Mr Giscard d’Estaing says the treaty was drafted by legal experts in a process very different from the “public” debates that yielded the constitution.
He describes the treaty as “a catalogue of amendments” that is impenetrable for the public.
Unfortunately, Britain and the rest of the countries in the European Union are sleep-walking into a sickening Communist superstate that will resemble a hybrid of 1984 and Brave New World to put it mildly.
The powers that be pretended it was just about economic co-operation but always knew it was about the complete political, social and military integration.
Since when did Europe become a country? I was taught in Geography that it was a continent made up of numerous different countries. Not anymore. I mean we’ve got our own EU flag and anthem for crying out loud!
Wake up people before its too late!!!!!!