Daily Archives: November 10, 2007

Browns Britain – EU 5th columnists now run government

 

PJC Journal | Oct 1, 2007

Browns Britain – EU 5th columnists now run government

by IanPP

*excerpts*

Ever since watching this frightening video (Common Purpose EUs 5th Column in UK) I have been looking into the so-called charity that calls itself ‘Common Purpose’ and guess what…only ‘communists’ have a common purpose, the rest of us are expendable.

(The vid is 2hrs long, but essential to give you background)

Those within Government and Local Authorities have their ‘training’ paid for by the public purse, yet they are reluctant to admit even with Freedom of Information requests. It is a secret society, no-one will admit to being a member of Common Purpose, yet many senior politicians, senior police, Senior Armed Services members, and key position holders in Local Authorities are members of this secretive group.

They call it ‘Leading beyond Authority’

I call it taking what you are not authorised to take, i.e. power.

We urge the nations bloggers, newspapers and those clean politicians to investigate this ‘charity’ urgently.

Blogger James Higham takes up the challenge, confronting these 5th Columnists.

as does Battle for Britain.

The opening page of the “Common Purpose” website is harmless enough; but click on a few links and the sinister message becomes obvious.

It began in the UK in 1988, where it has some 45 offices, but has now taken its sun symbol logo into many countries as Common Purpose International. These include France, Germany, Ghana, Hungary, India, Ireland, Netherlands, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and Turkey. I understand it is also moving in on the United States. This is its stated goal:

‘Common Purpose aims to improve the way society works by expanding the vision, decision making ability and influence of all kinds of leaders. The organisation runs a variety of educational programmes for leaders of all ages, backgrounds and sectors, in order to provide them with the inspiration, information and opportunities they need to change the world.’

From such bland descriptions come two questions immediately:

A common purpose to what end?

And ‘change the world’ in what way exactly?

We need answers here because Common Purpose is sweeping through the UK ‘training’ leaders in all areas of society and if they have a ‘common purpose’ we ought to know about it.

One of the Trustee’s of Common Purpose International is Rudi Bogni, who has written several articles for Wilmott Magazine, here and here. Both articles very well outline the problems with our society and would appeal to most I think, but fall short on giving us the answers. Only Common Purpose have those.

Another trustee Tarek Ben Halim, is also a trustee of another organisation, The Arab Learning Initiative based in Egypt, now rebranded as Alfanar (in Arabic Alfanar means lighthouse), which appears to have similar goals, they say that ‘Our goal is to promote social change in the Arab world’. We believe that achieving social change is a long term goal and requires a long term commitment they say.

They received a donation of approximately £25,000 from the Westminster Foundation for Democracy to fund one of their projects. WFD is an organisation accountable to Parliament in the UK.

The Common Purpose organisation now has training programmes in every major town and city in Britain and since 1989 more than 60,000 people have been involved with 20,000 ‘leaders’ completing one or more programmes. These are:

Leaders: Matrix and Focus

Emerging leaders: Navigator

Very young leaders: Your Turn

Leaders who need a local briefing: Profile

National leaders: 20:20

What charity trains National Leaders ??

The official founder and Chief Executive of Common Purpose is Julia Middleton who in her profile at the Common Purpose UK Website (www.commonpurpose.org.uk) fails to mention a rather relevant fact: she was also Head of Personnel Selection in the office of John Prescott, the Deputy Prime Minister to Tony Blair.

Prescott has been the man with responsibility for creating ‘regional assemblies’ around the United Kingdom which are part of the plan to abolish nations and bring their powerless ‘regions’ under the jackboot of the European Union. He has, of course, sought to sell this policy as ‘devolving power to the people’.

Prescott has common purpose with Common Purpose and Julia Middleton because they are all committed to the same end. The European superstate is designed to be centrally controlled and managed at lower levels by bland and brain dead ‘leaders’ who are all programmed to think the same. This is where Common Purpose comes in.

You will also see the Orwellian Newspeak technique in which the organisation claims to stand for what it is seeking to destroy – Common Purpose says its aim is to develop ‘diverse’ leaders, whilst creating the opposite.

Ever been on a ‘diversity training’ course?. Designed to make you accept all that is going on around you.

Does it begin to make sense now why Labour, Tory and Liberal all occupy the same ground.

Significant work. We aim to change the world .

I knew there was a catch!

Brian Gerrish at http://www.eutruth.org.uk discovered Common Purpose when he was involved with a group in Plymouth in the west of England helping people find jobs and one of their projects was repairing wooden boats. He said they had lots of public support and backing from the local authorities and everything was going fine. But then it suddenly changed and the council support was withdrawn. When they tried to continue alone, he said that within a short time key people were being threatened:

‘When we started to explore why we were being threatened we were absolutely staggered to find a very strange organisation called Common Purpose operating in the city. And we were absolutely amazed that there were so many people involved but they were not declaring themselves …

‘[Common Purpose] was operating throughout the structure of the city, in the city council, in the government offices, in the police, in the judiciary. Essentially we discovered what is effectively, at best, a quasi secret society which doesn’t declare itself to ordinary people.’

Further research has led Gerrish to establish that Common Purpose is recruiting and training leaders to be loyal to the objectives of the organisation and the European Union and preparing the governing structure for what it calls the ‘post-democratic society’ after nations are replaced by regions in the European Union.

‘They are learning to rule without regard to democracy, and will bring the EU police state home to every one of us’, Gerrish says. Common Purpose ‘graduates’ are increasingly everywhere, as you will see from the partial list at the end of this article.

When the organisation was given an award in 2005 by one of it clients, Newcastle University in the North East of England, it was revealed that among its graduates in that area were:

Michael Craik, Northumbria Police Chief Constable;

Andrew Dixon, Executive Director of the Arts Council England, North East;

Glyn Evans, City Centre Chaplain;

Chris Francis, Centre Manager of the Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust;

Anne Marshall, Chief Officer of Age Concern;

Anthony Sargent, General Director of The Sage Gateshead;

Miriam Harte, Director of Beamish Museum; and

Sue Underwood, Chief Executive of NEMLAC (the North East Museums, Libraries and Archives Council).

Brian Gerrish has found them to be throughout the government structure with more than £100 million of taxpayers money spent on Common Purpose courses for state employees. It has members in the National Health Service, BBC, police, legal profession, religion, local councils, the Civil Service, government ministries,! Parliament and Regional Development Agencies.

Common Purpose graduate Cressida Dick issued the ‘shoot-to-kill’ order to police officers that led to an innocent Brazilian electrician, Jean Charles de Menezes being held down by police and shot eight times at point blank range, seven of them in the head. Cressida Dick has since been outrageously promoted from commander to deputy assistant commissioner in the Metropolitan police.

Janet Paraskeva, the Law Society’s Chief Executive Officer, is also a Common Purpose graduate and there are many and increasing numbers in the law and enforcement professions.

Common Purpose meetings are held under the ‘Chatham House rule’ in which participants are free to use the information received but not to reveal the identity or affiliation of the source, nor anyone else participating.

Chatham House is the headquarters of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, which is part of the web that includes the Council on Foreign Relations and Trilateral Commission in the United States. It introduced the ‘Chatham House rule’ to keep its meetings secret while still having its policy promote

Full Story

The deceit behind global warming

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill…The real enemy, then, is humanity itself….Bring the divided nation together to face an outside enemy, either a real one or else one INVENTED for the purpose…”

– The First Global Revolution: A Report by the Council of Rome

Telegraph | Nov 5, 2007

By Christopher Booker and Richard North

No one can deny that in recent years the need to “save the planet” from global warming has become one of the most pervasive issues of our time. As Tony Blair’s chief scientific adviser, Sir David King, claimed in 2004, it poses “a far greater threat to the world than international terrorism”, warning that by the end of this century the only habitable continent left will be Antarctica.

Inevitably, many people have been bemused by this somewhat one-sided debate, imagining that if so many experts are agreed, then there must be something in it. But if we set the story of how this fear was promoted in the context of other scares before it, the parallels which emerge might leave any honest believer in global warming feeling uncomfortable.

The story of how the panic over climate change was pushed to the top of the international agenda falls into five main stages. Stage one came in the 1970s when many scientists expressed alarm over what they saw as a disastrous change in the earth’s climate. Their fear was not of warming but global cooling, of “a new Ice Age”.

For three decades, after a sharp rise in the interwar years up to 1940, global temperatures had been falling. The one thing certain about climate is that it is always changing. Since we began to emerge from the last Ice Age 20,000 years ago, temperatures have been through significant swings several times. The hottest period occurred around 8,000 years ago and was followed by a long cooling. Then came what is known as the “Roman Warming”, coinciding with the Roman empire. Three centuries of cooling in the Dark Ages were followed by the “Mediaeval Warming”, when the evidence agrees the world was hotter than today.

Around 1300 began “the Little Ice Age”, that did not end until 200 years ago, when we entered what is known as the “Modern Warming”. But even this has been chequered by colder periods, such as the “Little Cooling” between 1940 and 1975. Then, in the late 1970s, the world began warming again.

A scare is often set off – as we show in our book with other examples – when two things are observed together and scientists suggest one must have been caused by the other. In this case, thanks to readings commissioned by Dr Roger Revelle, a distinguished American oceanographer, it was observed that since the late 1950s levels of carbon dioxide in the earth’s atmosphere had been rising. Perhaps it was this increase that was causing the new warming in the 1980s?

Stage two of the story began in 1988 when, with remarkable speed, the global warming story was elevated into a ruling orthodoxy, partly due to hearings in Washington chaired by a youngish senator, Al Gore, who had studied under Dr Revelle in the 1960s.

But more importantly global warming hit centre stage because in 1988 the UN set up its Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (the IPCC). Through a series of reports, the IPCC was to advance its cause in a rather unusual fashion. First it would commission as many as 1,500 experts to produce a huge scientific report, which might include all sorts of doubts and reservations. But this was to be prefaced by a Summary for Policymakers, drafted in consultation with governments and officials – essentially a political document – in which most of the caveats contained in the experts’ report would not appear.

This contradiction was obvious in the first report in 1991, which led to the Rio conference on climate change in 1992. The second report in 1996 gave particular prominence to a study by an obscure US government scientist claiming that the evidence for a connection between global warming and rising CO2 levels was now firmly established. This study came under heavy fire from various leading climate experts for the way it manipulated the evidence. But this was not allowed to stand in the way of the claim that there was now complete scientific consensus behind the CO2 thesis, and the Summary for Policy-makers, heavily influenced from behind the scenes by Al Gore, by this time US Vice-President, paved the way in 1997 for the famous Kyoto Protocol.

Kyoto initiated stage three of the story, by formally committing governments to drastic reductions in their CO2 emissions. But the treaty still had to be ratified and this seemed a good way off, not least thanks to its rejection in 1997 by the US Senate, despite the best attempts of Mr Gore.

Not the least of his efforts was his bid to suppress an article co-authored by Dr Revelle just before his death. Gore didn’t want it to be known that his guru had urged that the global warming thesis should be viewed with more caution.

Blackwater faces lawsuits from grieving guard families

Monsters and Critics | Nov 8, 2007

By Karyn Chenoweth

The mother of a Blackwater guard who was mutilated and killed by a mob in Iraq is demanding that the company answer her questions.

Donna Zovko also hopes that she will get some answers on how and why her son died. Blackwater officials have not been forthcoming, she says to CNN.

After seeing Donna Zovko’s story on CNN, Blackwater Chairman Erik Prince said of her: “I would be willing to meet with her without media present, out of fear of it becoming a media circus.”

“I would like that. It would be one of my prayers answered. Maybe he’ll tell me the truth,” she says.

Donna Zovko adds: “Why does it have to be 44 months before they tell us anything?”

Donna Zovko told CNN she found some comfort in an image of her son’s body before the mobs got to him. His eyes were closed, his mouth open, as if he were calling God “to take his soul.”

Jerry Zovko, a former Army Ranger, had gone to Iraq as a security contractor to train Iraqi soldiers. When that contract ended in late 2003, he signed on with a different company, Blackwater, according to his mother.

CNN reports that during a mission in  Falluja, he and his comrades Scott Helvenston, Mike Teague and Wesley Batalona were killed when they were ambushed in their two vehicles as they escorted three empty flatbed trucks.

Donna Zovko, a Croatian immigrant whose original name is Danica, told CNN that Blackwater chief Prince paid a personal visit to her to inform her of her son’s death. Prince also attended the funeral, and the company held a memorial service.

After that ceremony, she said, she and her family were taken to a private room where they asked for more details about the events surrounding her son’s death to no avail.

Blackwater has taken issue with the House report. The incident in Falluja “was a tragedy in which no one — but the terrorists — are to blame,” the company said in a recent statement.

Today, Blackwater’s Prince added this: “I was communicating with her all the way up until the time the lawsuit was filed.” CNN writes that the Zovko family disputes this.

According to CNN, Donna Zovko and the three other families who lost their sons in the Falluja ambush have sued Blackwater, alleging the company failed to provide their loved ones with adequate gear, weaponry and support.

Blackwater denies the allegations and claims the men agreed to assume the risks of working in a war zone.

CNN reports that Donna Zovko met Pope John Paul II in August 2004 after her son was killed and he told her “God has accepted Jerry’s soul” — comforting words that still give her peace.

“It was a big gift for me to see the Holy Father and to meet the Holy Father, but for the truth of my Jerry’s death, I’d give it back,” Donna Zovko said to CNN.

Feds: Bernard Kerik’s a scammer who ripped off city

 

Knights of the British Empire: Bernard Kerik lied, schemed and sold out the city – all under the nose of his mentor and pal, presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani.

NY DAILY NEWS | Nov 10, 2007

BY THOMAS ZAMBITO and GREG B. SMITH

Bernard Kerik lied, schemed and sold out the city – all under the nose of his mentor and pal, presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani.

That is the stark portrait painted in the 16-count indictment unsealed yesterday in White Plains Federal Court almost exactly one year before Election Day 2008.

While the political fallout remains uncertain, the effect on Kerik’s image as a Sept. 11 hero is devastating.

In meticulous detail, Manhattan U.S. Attorney Michael Garcia assembled count after count painting Kerik as a money-grubbing liar who tried to cover his tracks.

The indictment says the misdeeds took place as Giuliani promoted his former driver to the top levels of his administration, from running city prisons to heading the largest police force in America.

Yesterday, Kerik, 52, stood ramrod straight in a white shirt, red tie and navy blue jacket to declare “not guilty, your honor” in court, moments before being freed on a $500,000 bail bond backed up by his New Jersey mansion.

Outside, he could not resist bringing up Sept. 11: “The worst challenges until this time were my challenges during and after 9/11. This is a battle I’m going to fight.”

The indictment charges Kerik with conspiracy, tax fraud, making false statements and depriving the city of his honest services. If convicted, he faces up to 142 years in prison and up to $4.75 million in fines.

The indictment starts in 1998, after Giuliani made Kerik correction commissioner, continues through 2000, when he named him police commissioner, and ends in 2006, after Giuliani’s recommendation that Kerik run the Homeland Security Department imploded.

Prosecutors painted these broad strokes:

# Theft of services: Prosecutors say Kerik tried to convince city investigators that a New Jersey contractor secretly renovating his Bronx apartment had no mob ties.

The lobbying began at a July1999 meeting at Walker’s bar in Tribeca, when he was correction commissioner.

The city investigator, Giuliani’s cousin, Ray Casey, said later he had no clue the contractor he was probing picked up the tab for renovating Kerik’s Riverdale co-op. The payments continued after Kerik became top cop.

Later, Kerik “caused witnesses to make false statements” to investigators, the indictment charges. Kerik pleaded guilty to minor state charges of not reporting the payments on city financial disclosure forms.

While he was still police commissioner, Kerik began lining up business deals and got a free upper East Side apartment for it, prosecutors say.

In October 2001, Police Commissioner Kerik approached developer Steve Witkoff, with whom he “anticipated doing business.”

Kerik “requested his assistance in locating an apartment.” The developer found Kerik a luxury apartment and made rent payments of $9,650 a month.

The indictment says the developer paid rent totaling $236,269 for Kerik from December 2001 – a month before he left city employment – through December 2003.
# Tax fraud: Throughout his rise in the Giuliani administration, Kerik repeatedly lied to the IRS. His lies included his failure to declare the apartment renovations and Witkoff’s rent payments.

Prosecutors say that also was true for the $75,000 Kerik received for writing a forward to an art book on Sept. 11 heroes; the $20,000 he got from a computer software firm, and the wages he paid to an off-the-books nanny. He also claimed a bogus $80,000 charitable donation, the indictment charges.
# False statements: Prosecutors say Kerik continued the masquerade after leaving the Giuliani administration.

He lied to the White House in 2002 through 2004 in applying for several federal positions, including director of Homeland Security.

Now Kerik is looking for donations through his Web site to pay his legal bills.

9/11 Protester Heckles Giuliani in Colorado

Denver Post | Nov 10, 2007

Giuliani heckled in Loveland

By Tom McGhee

Protester Sander Hicks was taken off the property during a visit by Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani at Loveland Coffee Co. Saturday in Loveland. (Post / RJ Sangosti)

A group of 9/11 conspiracy theorists heckled Republican presidential front-runner Rudy Giuliani as supporters booed and chanted “Rudy” at a campaign stop in Loveland Saturday.

Jason Charles, a member of wearechangecolorado.org, accused the former New York City mayor of having prior knowledge of the attack on the World Trade Center and covering up evidence that would have shown a conspiracy.

“He covered up criminal evidence that was on the scene,” he said.

“The conspiracy theorists are protesting all over the place. It is very sad; it’s not true,” Giuliani said after at least one of the hecklers was escorted from the Loveland Coffee Co. where Giuliani signed autographs and posed with supporters.

More than 100 people crowded outside and within the small shop to see Giuliani, who leads in polls for the Republican nomination.

The former Republican mayor of a Democratic city, Giuliani has ridden his performance in the wake of the attack to the national stage. He has won support from Republicans despite his pro-abortion and other liberal positions.

Giuliani faced questions from media about his recommendation of former New York City police commissioner Bernard Kerik to head the Department of Homeland Security.

Kerik, who was indicted on federal corruption charges on Friday, later withdrew his bid for the post saying he had hired an illegal immigrant.

Prosecutors say Kerik skimmed hundreds of thousands of dollars in personal income as police commissioner.

“I made a mistake,” Giuliani said of Kerik, who began working as his chauffeur in 1991 and rose to become New York’s top cop under Giuliani.

“I apologized for the mistake, I should have vetted him more carefully. I have done many things; that doesn’t mean I made all the right decisions,” he said.

Full Story

Marines take part in mock terrorist drill in Martinsville

As far as the Marines were concerned, the DuPont facility was an al-Qaida terrorist training camp in the fictional country of Micah, a home to the equally nonexistent Rocky Mount Resistance terrorist group.

Erich Parker, global public relations leader for DuPonts division dealing with safety-related items, said DuPont was proud to allow the Marines to use the facility for training. The U.S. Government was DuPont’s first customer, for gunpowder, more than 200 years ago, he said. And many of the soldiers were wearing Kevlar vests or other items containing fibers DuPont makes, he said.

Sorry, but “Rocky Mount Resistance” doesn’t sound very Islamic to me. It sounds like they are conflating Islamic terrorism with “domestic terrorism” ie American “extremist” groups which all happen to be funded into existence by the intelligence agencies just like Al Qaeda was, but again are conflated with real grass-roots patriotic groups and other individuals who are legitimately fighting against the rise of CFR-mandated communo-fascism in America.

9/11 was an inside job. The War on Terror is a hoax. It is used by elite pirates and sadists as a pretext to loot, torture and trample basic inalienable rights. It is used to set up a high-tech Orwellian police state. It is a coup takeover of all the governments of the world in order to artificially amalgamate them into the global New World Order system. Anybody who tells you different is a damned liar or a fool at best.

Even if you believe the War on Terror is real, you will soon realize that the things they are doing are Nazi-like and anathema to freedom. You will be forced therefore to conclude that they are conducting this war for all the wrong reasons and in all the wrong ways. You will come to understand that losing our sovereignty, losing our wealth as a nation, losing our manufacturing so that we have to buy lethal “date-rape” drugged toys for our children made in Communist China, losing all our freedoms one by one, losing our ability to find healthful foods that aren’t genetically altered and allowing this despicable torture and the killing hundreds of thousands of mostly innocent people is not keeping us safe at any level. You will then be forced to consider the possibility that bad guys like the DuPonts themselves might behind all of this and to question what went on during the attacks of September 11th.

PW

. . .

Marines, playing the role of terrorists, took part in a training exercise at the former DuPont site on Thursday.

Martinsville Bulletin | Nov 9, 2007

Marine ‘battle’ readies troops for real thing

By SHAWN HOPKINS

For a few hours Thursday night, the DuPont facility in Henry County was a mock battleground, a site for a large-scale training exercise for Marine 24th Expeditionary Unit from Camp Lejeune in Jacksonville, N.C.

As far as the Marines were concerned, the DuPont facility was an al-Qaida terrorist training camp in the fictional country of Micah, a home to the equally nonexistent Rocky Mount Resistance terrorist group.

Under the exercise, a two-man reconnaissance team had watched the about 20 Marine role-players, all dressed the part in middle-eastern looking garb and carrying weapons, for two days as they carried out their daily routines in the camp.

These included prayers, the work of the training camp and visits from “high value” targets that the Marines later would try to find inside the building, and the intelligence was used by commanders of the operation to plan their assault.

The routine was shattered — according to plan — shortly after 7 p.m. Thursday when a Marine sniper fired a live round into a dummy target, taking out the stand-in for a shoulder-fired rocket operator identified in the intelligence phase.

The area soon was swarming with aircraft, from large planes standing in as bombers overhead, to Cobra and Huey attack helicopters serving as lower air support, to six transport helicopters that thundered out of the night sky to make combat landings on pad from a demolished plant and warehouse complex and dropped off the rest of the about 104 Marines who took part in the exercise.

Some of those Marines secured the area, “killing” any resistance outside with blanks from their machine guns and setting up a landing area to evacuate wounded.

Another force breached the door of one of the unused DuPont buildings with a specialized type of sledge hammer and crowbar. Using nightvision goggles and flashlights, they methodically searched the building, looking for targets, killing resistance and attempting to capture the “high value” targets for interrogation.

The exercise also included the evacuation of three Marine “wounded.” It took about two hours, after which the transport helicopters, which had refueled at the airport in Danville, landed again and the Marines left for Ft. Pickett in Blackstone.

Gunnery Sgt. Carlos Orjuela, who served as a platoon sergeant during the exercise, was one of the first Marines on the ground and stayed with the force that secured the outside.

He said the Marines found a primary target, an SA7 rocket, inside the building, but did not find the two “high value” role-players they had been shown pictures of as far as he knew.

He said he felt the exercise provided good training for the Marines, partly because it makes them adapt to an unfamiliar environment. In such exercises things “never really always go as planned,” he said, so Marines also have to quickly adapt and respond to the unexpected.

Cpl. William Pruitt, one of the al-Qaida role-players, said he also thought the training exercise was helpful and hoped the Marines could get benefits such as learning from any mistakes made during the exercise. He said the role-players tried to get as “deep” as they could into the terrorist personas they were playing, although he had not picked out a terrorist name for himself.

Marine Maj. Ron Jones said the training was part of six months of combat training the Marines will go through before they are deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan.

Much of that training takes place on bases, he said. He said the Marines were appreciative that they were allowed to use the DuPont facility because there is “no way, no how,” bases can completely replicate the types of obstacles Marines might have to deal with in real urban combat situation.

Erich Parker, global public relations leader for DuPonts division dealing with safety-related items, said DuPont was proud to allow the Marines to use the facility for training. The U.S. Government was DuPont’s first customer, for gunpowder, more than 200 years ago, he said. And many of the soldiers were wearing Kevlar vests or other items containing fibers DuPont makes, he said.

Dale Wagoner, Henry County director of public safety, said the training exercise had been planned in Henry County for about six months. He said he spoke to FBI Special Agent Bob Myrick, who was scouting sites, and told him the DuPont facility would be perfect.

Since then the county has worked with the military to make sure they had what they needed during the training, he said, which also included a couple of weeks of combat helicopter landings in Martinsville and other areas before the mock attack.

The county also volunteer fire and other personnel on the ground during the incident in case anything went wrong. The assistance and support was something the county personnel provided gladly, he said.

“They’re protecting our freedom,” Wagoner said. “And they’re learning to do it right here in Martinsville and Henry County.”

Related

Marines take part in mock terrorist drill in Martinsville
Training for the war on Terror, it happens everyday. And, for the past week about 2,000 Marines have been in Central and Southside Virginia doing just that, training. Thursday night some Marines took part in a mock terrorist drill in Martinsville. The scenario involved a terrorist group known as the Rocky Mount Resistance. They were hiding out the fictional country of “Mica” at the Dupont plant. After some Marines spent a couple of days gathering intelligence, they decided to take the terrorists down. Once the “terrorists” were apprehended, Marines flew them back to Fort Pickett for questioning. [Read: “waterboarding”]

“The DuPonts have three allies in Germany that are aiding in the armament business. Their chief ally is the I. G. Farben Company, a part of the Government which gives 200,000 marks a year to one propaganda organization operating on American opinion.”

– U.S. Ambassador in Germany, William Dodd, writing to FDR from Berlin on October 19, 1936 (three years after Hitler came to power), concerning American industrialists and their aid to the Nazis

How the Allied multinationals supplied Nazi Germany throughout World War II
Early in 1934, Irenee du Pont and Knudsen reached their explosion point over President Roosevelt. Along with friends of the Morgan Bank and General Motors, certain Du Pont backers financed a coup d’etat that would overthrow the President with the aid of a $3 million-funded army of terrorists, modeled on the fascist movement in Paris known as the Croix de Feu

Nazis in the Attic

Documented Evidence of a Secret Business and Political Alliance Between the U.S. Establishment and the Nazis, Before, During and After World War II

DU PONT AND GENERAL MOTORS
General Motors is included here because, by 1929, the Du Pont corporation had acquired controlling interest in, and had interlocking directorships with, General Motors. Irenee du Pont, “the most imposing and powerful member of the clan,” according to biographer and historian Charles Higham, “was obsessed with Hitler’s principles. “He keenly followed the career of the future Fuhrer in the 1920s, and on September 7, 1926, in a speech to the American Chemical Society, he advocated a race of supermen, to be achieved by injecting special drugs into them in boyhood to make their characters to order.”

THE MACGUIRE AFFAIR

Many business leaders, including those in the Du Pont camp, and even some liberals for a time, had been infatuated with the fascist movement.

New Jersey Blocks DuPont Treatment of Nerve Agent Wastewater

DuPont attempts to influence anti-GM food campaigners

Corporate Crimes
DUPONT (E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY)

DuPont was one of the companies that manufactured the defoliant Agent Orange that devastated human health and the environment in Vietnam. The company also ran chemical warfare plants for the US government.

Sarkozy’s Mossad ties exposed

Zionist President Nicholas Sarkozy with Bush I and Bush II in Maine

Press TV | Nov 10, 2007

A report reveal French President Nicolas Sarkozy worked long years as an asset for Israeli intelligence long before he was elected president.

French daily Le Figaro said last week the French leader once worked for the Zionist regime as a sayan -Hebrew for helper.

Ex-Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky says sayans, who perform many roles, are Jewish citizens of other nationalities assisting Mossad.

Le Figaro claimed even before the presidential election, French police officials managed to keep secret a letter, which exposed Sarkozy’s past participation in espionage activities on behalf of Mossad.

The letter fixed Sarkozy’s alleged spying activities as far back as 1983.

In the immediate aftermath of Le Figaro’s exposé, the Zionist regime’s Prime Minister Ehud Olmert was on a state visit to France to discuss Iran’s nuclear program, which raised more questions about the report.

Analysts believe since Sarkozy took office in May, he has taken every opportunity to pledge his allegiance to the United States and the Zionist regime.

“Sarko the Sayan” has also followed in the footsteps of the White House by choosing a hostile approach toward Iran and its peaceful nuclear activities.