CDC Creating a “Zombie Horror” Consciousness
By Dr. Stephen C. L’Hommedieu
NewsWithViews.com | Aug 17, 2011
“How do I prepare for a zombie apocalypse?” Supposedly, this was the question raised by the general public that motivated the CDC into action with the release of “Preparedness 101: Zombie Apocalypse.”  It’s a ridiculous question by most standards, but apparently not for the CDC. That’s because the CDC’s “Zombie Apocalypse” is targeting a younger audience to accomplish a number of important objectives. This includes planting the seeds of “zombie horror” consciousness.
An important feature of this state of consciousness is how negative psychological elements of zombie horror imagery and its fictional life-threatening situations can be recalled within the context of an actual emergency to impact your perceptions. The objective would be to exploit the fear factor in hope that many of you adopt a similar model of zombie-terrorized behavior. This facilitates the impact of media hype to influence your judgment under emergency circumstances, reminiscent of the H1N1 swine flu “pandemic.”
Ultimately, the silent persuasion of zombie horror is intended to induce similar perceptions of hopelessness and despair. In other words, false perceptions could move you to accept that you’re without any good choice. In your mind, to survive a zombie apocalypse, you would feel compelled to do things that may oppose your moral and ethical standards and beliefs, violate your personal and constitutional rights, or possibly cause undue harm to you and your family.
The Meaning of CDC Technical Assistance and Investigation Goals
Following Dr. Kahn’s list of good emergency recommendations we find the CDC “technical assistance” provisions. This is presented in a non-threatening form of standard medical emergency procedures. But if it were applied with unprincipled intent, which has become a standard practice with vaccine initiatives, it could easily serve as a license for abuse. Think of it as a future medical version of the “Patriot” Act. Consider how there is room for some elaboration to the meaning of these terms. This should serve as a warning to prepare you for the magnitude of government intervention that could be unleashed during the next emergency.
Patient Management and Care: Under emergency circumstances you will most likely have little authority, if any, to utilize the health care of your choice. You may find yourself having to accept the “choice” of being vaccinated against your will to protect public health. Supposing a vaccine mandate was forced upon the public, and you were to refuse, you could expect some form of forceful intimidation, confinement, restrictions and/or significant penalties.
Tracking Contacts: This could also mean S.W.A.T. or other armed law enforcement may be given authority to seek you out and illegally enter your home or facility without your permission or a warrant. You could then be seized and subject to “infection control” should you display any suspicious signs or symptoms associated with an infectious agent, such as nausea, tremors, sweating, shortness of breath, or contentious behavior, although similar symptoms could be provoked when held at gunpoint.
The meaning of “Tracking contacts” can also encompass other applications when coupled with unprincipled intent. This system of surveillance could just as well be used to track down vaccine oppositionists for violating vaccine mandates in the future. If the thought of being held at gunpoint to be vaccinated is difficult to conceive, consider the 131 children in Nsanje who fled to Mozambique to escape the measles vaccine. They were eventually tracked down by medics under a police escort and forcibly vaccinated at gunpoint.  You may think this couldn’t happen here in the U.S., but think again. If the CDC, HHS (U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services) and others have their way, this practice could be on its way to a neighborhood near you. Remember that even the Department of Education now employs aggressive and violent S.W.A.T. teams to arrest those suspected of student loan offenses.
Infection Control/Isolation and Quarantine: Mike Adams, The Health Ranger, provided the details in his article: “’Infection Control’ means [arresting] infected people at gunpoint and moving them into ‘infection zones’ where everybody and anyone who tries to flee is shot. That’s how a quarantine actually works, in case you didn’t know. Ask the CDC yourself if you don’t believe me.”  Isolation and quarantine are where the “zombies” (those who refuse vaccinations) will be confined.
Then there’s a brief description of the CDC “investigation goals.” Of particular interest is where it describes how such an investigation would seek to, “determine the cause of the illness, the source of the infection/virus/toxin…prevent further cases, and how patients can best be treated.”
This would be impressive if only CDC “investigation goals” weren’t selectively compromised. For example, there’s the CDC’s extraordinary failure to effectively investigate a primary cause behind the sky-rocketing autism emergency – an excessive and toxic vaccine schedule!  Unfortunately, this problem is inherent with its design. CDC goals must always align with the financial interests of the pharmaceutical industry and government and global objectives.
Dr. Julie Gerberding, the past CDC Director and, not by coincidence, now President of Merck’s global vaccine division, was interviewed by Dr. Sanjay Gupta, chief medical correspondent for CNN. The program was to “clarify” the issue of whether vaccines could cause autism, and more specifically to address the Hannah Poling vaccine injury case. Watch here to hear the evasive responses to pertinent, autism-defining questions. As the CDC director at that time, Dr. Gerberding clearly illustrates how seriously the CDC would address any emergency that threatens the lifeblood of the vaccine industry.
Fear-Based Measles Incrimination Reinforces CDC Misinformation
Within the article’s fear-based zombie background information, it conspicuously categorizes the measles virus within the context of gruesome and extremely deadly “mutations of existing conditions.” Included among such life threatening conditions as mad-cow disease and rabies (or zombies chomping on your head), its only relevance is through fictional applications used in horror movies to produce zombies. Incriminated through its “celebrity” status, it’s a subtle method for presenting measles as viciously deadly.
There was a period in our history when the measles virus was a cause for concern. In “Mortality in the United States, 1900-1950,” Tavia Gordon explains: “Mortality for the communicable diseases of childhood fell sharply between 1900 and 1950 [largely due to improved hygiene, nutrition and medical care],” and, “In 1900, this group of diseases [diphtheria, pertussis, measles and scarlet fever] was responsible for 242.6 deaths per 100,000 children under 15. In 1950, these diseases together caused fewer than 5 deaths for every 100,000 children.” Although Gordon attributes these decreases to a number of factors, including inoculations, the measles vaccine was not licensed until 1963. Thus, the dramatic decrease in childhood measles fatalities was unrelated to measles vaccination.
After decades of measles vaccine intervention, this once common childhood disease is now on the rise again. The CDC claims the reason for measles resurgence is because, “90% of those infected had not been vaccinated, or their vaccination status was unknown.” Many have been deceived into believing this to be fact. However, there’s no shortage of opposing evidence to expose this underhanded claim as yet another CDC tale from the crypts.