House approves stiffer gun background checks

Los Angeles Times | Jun 14, 2007

Bill aims to block mentally ill from buying weapons

By Joel Havemann

WASHINGTON — The House yesterday passed what could become the first significant gun legislation in a decade, directing states to streamline the system for keeping track of criminals, mental patients, and others barred from buying firearms. The legislation also provides $250 million a year for the central database and grants to states to contribute to it.

The bill, which was passed by voice vote, was the product of rare cooperation between gun-control advocates and the National Rifle Association. It is intended to address problems highlighted by the mass shooting at Virginia Tech by a student with a history of mental health problems.

The measure is expected to pass the Senate.

Representative Carolyn McCarthy, Democrat of New York, a sponsor of the bill, said the current state records system is so flawed that “millions of criminal records are not accessible” by the national database that is supposed to notify gun dealers of disqualified buyers.

“I came to Congress in 1997, in the wake of my own personal tragedy, to help prevent gun violence,” said McCarthy, referring to her husband’s death at the hands of a gunman on a Long Island commuter train in 1993.

A spokesman for the NRA insisted that the bill does not amount to gun control and said the group endorsed it because it would improve enforcement of current gun restrictions, rather than adding more.

“There’s nothing in this bill that’s a step backwards,” said NRA executive vice president Wayne LaPierre.

Stricter gun-control efforts began after President Kennedy was slain in 1963, culminating in a significant revision of gun laws in 1968, following the assassinations of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and Senator Robert F. Kennedy. The last major changes came in 1994 — the last year, until now, that both houses of Congress were under Democratic control — when a five-day waiting period and background checks on potential handgun purchasers were imposed and the sale of some assault weapons was banned.

But since 1996, when individuals convicted of domestic violence were added to the list of prohibited purchasers, gun rights organizations have successfully fended off attempts to impose additional controls.

Even after the Columbine High School shootings in 1999, an effort to make sales of guns at gun shows subject to rules similar to those governing licensed dealers failed in Congress. The ban on selling assault weapons was allowed to lapse in 2004.

The latest legislation passed the House as President Bush received a report on the Virginia Tech shootings recommending broader action. The report endorsed the key goal of the House legislation: better reporting by the states to the FBI’s database of the names of people not allowed to purchase a gun because of a mental disability.

“The focus of discussions related to gun policy was on increasing the effectiveness of current federal firearms regulation, which is limited by divergent state practices,” said the report, prepared by the departments of Health and Human Services, Justice, and Education.

For example, the report noted that only 23 states currently provide information to the FBI on people who, under federal law, cannot buy a gun because of mental health issues.

White House spokesman Tony Fratto said that the president “very much” supports the goals of the House bill, but that his aides have some concerns about its $250 million annual price tag.

The House acted after a parade of legislators from both parties praised the legislation.

Only Representative Ron Paul, Republican of Texas, spoke out against the bill, calling it “flagrantly unconstitutional” and saying it undermines the Second Amendment right to bear arms and violates privacy rights of those whose medical records go into the FBI database.

The bill would require states to enter into that database the names of persons whom a court has deemed a danger to themselves or others.

Seung-Hui Cho, who killed 32 students and teachers at Virginia Tech in April before taking his own life, had been ordered by a court to undergo outpatient mental health therapy and should have been barred from buying the two handguns he used. But because he was ordered to receive only outpatient care, his name was not sent on to the FBI.

“The Virginia Tech shootings tragically demonstrated the gaps in the system that allowed a dangerous person to be armed,” said Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence.

LaPierre, in the uncustomary position of being in accord with Helmke, said the bill would not infringe on the right of qualified persons to buy guns; it would merely tighten enforcement of existing laws that are supposed to deny unqualified persons the opportunity to buy guns.

“We’ve always been vigorous about keeping guns out of the hands of people who shouldn’t have them,” LaPierre said.

But he warned the Senate not to amend the bill to include tougher gun controls. Such a strategy, he said, could cost the support of the gun lobby.

Leave a comment