Category Archives: Taxation

TSA wants to double security fees

KHOU 11 News | May 30, 2012

by JEREMY DESEL

HOUSTON—A Senate committee has approved a plan to double the fees charged to airline flyers to help fund the Transportation Security Administration.

Every flyer pays a $2.50 federal fee each way to help fund the TSA.

The proposal that just passed out of a US Senate committee would make that $5 each way or $10 per round trip.

Most federal agencies are trying to avoid the budget axe but the Transportation Security Administration is looking for direct revenue.

Higher TSA fees clear Senate committee

TSA wants to double your security fee

“It is almost $40 in taxes and fees to get on the flight? Why so much?” said Wanda Cloyd a traveler coming into Houston from New Jersey. “I think that is crazy.”

The fee could be charged to airlines but any cost to the airlines eventually gets passed on to the customer.

“They want you to pay for something to eat, for a cart to carry your bag and then if you want to put a bag on the plane it is $25 more, ” says air traveler Belinda Owens.

Those baggage fees are a big part of the problem, according to the TSA. The airlines checked bag fees have changed the security dynamic.

Now so many more people are carrying on their luggage, the agency says it is costing at least an additional $260 million a year to screen passengers and that luggage on the way to the gate.

It is not that flyers seem unwilling to pay for security.

“I would pay it if I thought it was truly necessary. The problem is there is a whole lot of irresponsibility,” says flyer John Huff.

The TSA said it hasn’t hiked the fee in 10 years.

Hefty fines for blaming price hikes on carbon taxes

Don’t serve carbon “lies”, ACCC warns

Daily Telegraph | May 25, 2012

By Phil Hudson

SHOPS and restaurants could face fines up to $1.1 million if waiters or sales staff wrongly blame the carbon tax for price rises or exaggerate the impact.

And households are being warned to watch out for telephone scammers offering to deposit carbon tax compensation into their bank accounts.

The prices watchdog, the ACCC, will today launch its countdown to the July 1 carbon tax with a special focus on helping small businesses understand their obligations and consumers to be vigilant for false claims.

It is releasing internet videos to help business, a 16-page guide and has set up a dedicated website www.accc.gov.au/carbon.

ACCC deputy chairman Dr Michael Schaper told the Herald Sun companies were entitled to increase their prices and did not have to justify or explain why.

“It is business as usual,” Dr Schaper said.

But if they blamed the carbon tax they must be able to prove it and not use it as a cover for other price increases related to wages, rent or stock.

“If a business claims that a price is linked to the carbon price, that claim must be truthful and have a reasonable basis,” he said.

Dr Schaper said the warning applied to comments made by staff over the phone, on the shop floor or in meetings.
It also covers advertising, product labels, websites, invoices, contracts and contract negotiations.

The ACCC has the power to force a business to substantiate that a price rise has been caused by the carbon tax.

The guide explains what businesses can and cannot do, and provides a checklist to follow.

Dr Schaper said businesses must be sure price rises were “based on your own costs”.

Think police really don’t have ticket quotas? Check out these leaks

National Post | May 2, 2012

by Marni Soupcoff

You know how police departments are always denying that they have quotas for how many traffic tickets their officers must write? Well, it may just be a matter of terminology.

A leaked memo recently sent by Sgt. Wanda DeCoste to officers in Toronto’s 31 Division reminds them that traffic enforcement officers are expected to write 25 tickets a day, and “accident car officers” are expected to write at least 10 tickets a day, provided they are not dealing with any collisions.

And yet, Toronto police still insist there are no quotas in place. Deputy Chief Peter Sloly offered this helpful distinction when talking with the Toronto Star: “No, there’s no quota. But there is an expectation.” (Clears it all up, doesn’t it?)

Here’s the thing. Whether you call it a quota or an expectation, there’s something problematic about police being dressed down and potentially sanctioned for not giving out a pre-set amount of tickets. In the memo, Sgt. DeCoste not only calls producing only one or two tickets a shift “unacceptable,” she intimates that by doing so, an officer could be ruining his chances of being recommended for career-promoting courses.

It’s talk like this that gets people like me feeling cynical about whether the traffic police are out there for our safety or to generate a guaranteed amount of revenue.

The idea that the police expect (one might even say hope for) a minimum of offenses per day suggests that they have no intention of actually trying to decrease the number of speeding cars, and certainly no expectation of their ticketing having that effect over time. (If they actually thought they were cutting down on speeding with their speed traps, they’d be revising the officers’ ticket quotas — sorry, ticket expectations — down each day.) Rather, what they really seem to want is to be able to rely on their officers nabbing a certain number of unlucky suckers every shift.

This is troubling, if not exactly Earth-shattering news, because once law enforcement starts operating with a mentality that it’s the “collars” that matter, there is a danger that such a way of thinking will hold sway in even more serious areas with more rights at stake.

When you get pulled over for a traffic violation, you waste ten minutes of your time, twiddling your thumbs for a while as you wait for your plates to be run, then eventually you pay a small fine.

It’s not great, and it’s not fair if the whole enterprise is designed for your fleecing rather than your protection from harm, but it’s not as intrusive as actually being arrested or physically searched by a police officer — actions which literally deprive a person of their liberty. Yet there have been credible allegations that in New York City, police have operated with quotas for these law enforcement activities too.

As you’d expect, the NYPD denied the charges, which surfaced in 2010, but in much the same way as Toronto police have denied the traffic ticket quota allegation: by using a different word.

An NYPD spokesman explained that the apparent quotas for arrests and stop-and-frisks there were actually just little aspirational numbers he liked to call “goals.”

To state the obvious: Neither Toronto nor New York has any shortage of serious crimes that need police resources, time and man-power for their investigation. What urbanite doesn’t have a story, experienced first-hand or heard through the grapevine, of police responding to a break-in with a sympathetic shake of the head and a don’t-expect-to-ever-see-any-of-your-stuff-again sigh?

So why couldn’t law enforcement shuffle things up and use their capabilities to follow up on crimes real people have actually reported, rather than on achieving bureaucratic statistical satisfaction in crimes politicians and policy makers have anticipated? Can you imagine how much more respect police would get from ordinary citizens as a result?

In the traffic arena, why not drop the ticket “expectations” and judge officers on how well they’re doing their job.

If they’re supposed to be out there standing behind a radar gun all day, then check to see if they’re standing out there standing behind a radar gun all day. (And maybe check to see if paying an officer to stand out there behind a radar gun all day is the best use of manpower.) Don’t make the excuse that the only way you can figure out what officers are up to is by counting how many tickets they’ve issued.

What better way to crush officers’ good instincts to use their discretion and training than to equate their performance with how much cash they’ve grabbed per shift?

Lastly, if officers are operating under pressure to issue a certain number of tickets, rather than using their own judgment about which drivers seem most dangerous, there would logically seem to be a greater likelihood of the officers issuing unnecessary on inappropriate tickets. (That’s what humans do when under pressure.) It’s those tickets that waste all of our money by creating more appeals, which require time in court, paperwork and officer overtime. It’s one more expensive collective headache.

It’s great that police departments are so good with words that they have ready access to soft synonyms for quotas. It doesn’t, however, excuse the practice.

Report: Toronto officers urged to write ‘book’ of tickets per day


Toronto Police Officer. Photo credit: Andrew Moran

Toronto Examiner | May 2, 2012

Toronto – It’s a pretty common scenario: you park your car and about 20 minutes later you find a ticket on your windshield. This leads you to tell yourself that these officers in the city are just giving you a ticket to meet their quota.

Well, there may be some truth to that sentiment, which is shared amongst many motorists in the city.

According to a memo leaked to the Toronto Sun, the 31 Division in northwest Toronto is apparently using a ticket quota system. The memo, issued by Sgt. Wanda DeCoste, encourages traffic officers to produce more tickets and if they fail to do so their careers may be on the line.

The Apr. 25 memo noted that enforcement officers are expected to write a book of tickets each day, which amounts to roughly 25 tickets. “Accident car officers are expected to produce at least 10 tickets a day if they have no collisions,” the memo reads.

Quotas are not official policy of the Toronto Police Services.

“There are those of you that are consistently producing and there are those that produce one, two or no tickets in an entire shift,” the memo states. “That is not acceptable, and really not fair to those that are carrying the unit. We all have a down day, but it shouldn’t be [every day].”

Sgt. DeCoste added that her department was last in statistics in Toronto and it “does not set well with me.” “You are all unique and exceptional folks, this is not an unrealistic expectation.”

The news outlet noted in its report that estimated numbers suggest Toronto Police officers can produce more than $216,000 per year in tickets, which would generate tens of millions of dollars in fines across the city.

Warmingon wrote in his report: “So you think it’s easy to be a police officer? The memo sounds like something to motivate door-to-door vacuum cleaner sales people.”

American taxpayers to provide military and financial support to the Afghan people for at least a decade beyond 2014


U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (L) and U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta hold a joint news conference at the Alliance headquarters in Brussels April 18, 2012. NATO foreign and defence ministers will refine plans for withdrawing combat troops from Afghanistan this week in a meeting that comes after an insurgent attack in the heart of Kabul and recrimination from the alliance’s Afghan allies. Reuters

US, Afghanistan reach deal on strategic pact

Associated Press | Apr 22, 2012

By HEIDI VOGT

KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) — The U.S. and Afghanistan reached a deal Sunday on a long-delayed strategic partnership agreement that ensures Americans will provide military and financial support to the Afghan people for at least a decade beyond 2014, the deadline for most foreign forces to withdraw.

The pact is key to the U.S. exit strategy in Afghanistan because it establishes guidelines for any American forces who remain after the withdrawal deadline and for financial help to the impoverished country and its security forces.

For the Afghan government, it is also a way to show its people that their U.S. allies are not just walking away.

“Our goal is an enduring partnership with Afghanistan that strengthens Afghan sovereignty, stability and prosperity and that contributes to our shared goal of defeating al-Qaida and its extremist affiliates,” said U.S. Embassy spokesman Gavin Sundwall. “We believe this agreement supports that goal.”

After 10 years of U.S.-led war, insurgents linked to the Taliban and al-Qaida remain a threat and as recently as a week ago launched a large-scale attack on the capital Kabul and three other cities.

The draft agreement was worked out and initialed by Afghan National Security Adviser Rangin Dadfar Spanta and U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker. It must still be reviewed in both countries and signed afterward by the Afghan and American presidents.

U.S. forces have already started pulling out of Afghanistan, and the majority of combat troops are scheduled to depart by the end of 2014. But the U.S. is expected to maintain a large presence in the country for years after, including special forces, military trainers and government-assistance programs.

The agreement is both an achievement and a relief for both sides, coming after months of turmoil that seemed to put the entire alliance in peril. It shows that the two governments are still committed to working together and capable of coming to some sort of understanding.

“The document finalized today provides a strong foundation for the security of Afghanistan, the region and the world and is a document for the development of the region,” Spanta said in a statement issued by President Hamid Karzai’s office.

Neither Afghan nor U.S. officials would comment on the details of the agreement. A Western official familiar with the negotiations said it outlines a strategic partnership for 10 years beyond 2014.

Reaching any agreement is likely to be seen as a success given more than a year and a half of negotiations during which the entire effort appeared in danger of falling apart multiple times.

Since the beginning of the year, U.S.-Afghan relations have been strained by an Internet video of American Marines urinating on the corpses of presumed Taliban fighters, by Quran burnings at a U.S. base that sparked days of deadly protests and by the alleged killing spree by a U.S. soldier in a southern Afghan village.

Tensions were further heightened by a spate of turncoat attacks by Afghan security forces on their international counterparts.

White House National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor said President Barack Obama expects to sign the document before a NATO summit in Chicago next month, meeting the deadline set by the two sides. Many had started to worry in recent weeks that Karzai and Obama would miss that goal as talks dragged on and Karzai continued to announce new demands for the document.

Much of the disagreement was about how to handle activities that the Afghan government saw as threatening its sovereignty, in particular, night raids and the detention of Afghan citizens by international forces. Those two major issues were resolved earlier this year in separate memorandums of understanding.

But closed-door talks continued for weeks after those side-deals were signed. And then as recently as last week, Karzai said that he wanted the agreement to include a dollar figure for funding for the Afghan security forces — a demand that would be hard for the Americans to sign off on given the need for congressional approval for funding. U.S. officials have said previously that they expected the document to address economic and development support for Afghanistan more generally.

The final document is likely to be short on specifics. U.S. officials involved in the negotiations have said previously that the strategic partnership will provide a framework for future relations, but that details of how U.S. forces operate in the country will come in a later agreement.

The initialing ceremony means that the text of the document is now locked in. But the countries will have to go through their own internal review processes, Sundwall said.

“For the United States, that will mean interagency review, consultation with Congress as appropriate and final review by the president,” Sundwall said.

In Afghanistan, the agreement will have to be approved by parliament. The Afghan foreign minister will brief Afghan lawmakers about the document Monday, the Afghan president’s statement said.

Middle Class Systematically Wiped Out By Globalization, Inflation and Taxation

25 Signs That Middle Class Families Are Being Wiped Out

businessinsider.com | Apr 17, 2012

by Michael Snyder

The middle class in America is being systematically wiped out, and most people don’t even realize what is happening.

Every single year, millions more Americans fall out of the middle class and become dependent on the government. The United States once had the largest and most vibrant middle class in the history of the world, but now the middle class is rapidly shrinking and government dependence is at an all-time high. 

So why is this happening? Well, America is becoming a poorer nation at the same time that wealth is becoming extremely concentrated at the very top. At this point, our economic system is designed to funnel as much money and power to the federal government and to the big corporations as possible. Individuals and small businesses have a really hard time thriving in this environment.

New data show grim picture of poverty

To most big corporations these days, workers are viewed as financial liabilities. Most corporations want to reduce their payrolls as much as possible. You see, the truth is that most corporations want to be just like Apple. If you can believe it, Apple makes $400,000 in profit per employee. Big corporations don’t care that you need to pay the mortgage and provide for your family. Their goal is to make as much money as possible. And most of the control freaks that run our bloated federal government don’t care much about middle class families either.

To many politicians and federal bureaucrats, middle class families are “useless eaters” that are constantly damaging the environment with their “excessive” lifestyles. In this day and age, neither the federal government nor the big corporations really have much use for middle class Americans, and that is really, really bad news for the the future of the middle class family in America.

There are three key factors that are constantly chipping away at the middle class….

-Globalization

-Inflation

-Taxes

Labor has become a global commodity, and American workers are often 10 to 20 times as expensive as workers on the other side of the world are.  Middle class jobs (such as manufacturing, etc.) have been leaving this country at an astounding pace.  Competition for the jobs that remain has become extremely fierce, and this has driven wages down.  The following is from a recent article in the New York Times….

But in the last two decades, something more fundamental has changed, economists say. Midwage jobs started disappearing. Particularly among Americans without college degrees, today’s new jobs are disproportionately in service occupations — at restaurants or call centers, or as hospital attendants or temporary workers — that offer fewer opportunities for reaching the middle class.

As paychecks have stagnated, the cost of living has continued to escalate. Middle class families are finding that their paychecks simply do not go nearly as far as they did before. This is creating a tremendous amount of financial stress in households all over America.

Meanwhile, our politicians are taxing the middle class like crazy.  Most people only focus on federal and state income taxes, but that is only a small part of the story.  As I detailed the other day, our politicians are taxing us in literally dozens of different ways and it is almost always the middle class that ends up getting hit the hardest.

If America wants to be great again, it is going to need a thriving middle class.  But right now the federal government and the big corporations are gobbling up all of the power and all of the money and the middle class is shrinking rapidly.

If current trends continue, eventually there will not be much of a middle class left.

The following are 25 signs that middle class families have been targeted for extinction….

#1 Over the past several decades, millions upon millions of middle class Americans have been systematically turned into government dependents.  Back in 1960, social welfare benefits made up approximately 10 percent of all salaries and wages.  In the year 2000, social welfare benefits made up approximately 21 percent of all salaries and wages.  Today, social welfare benefits make up approximately 35 percent of all salaries and wages.

#2 Unemployment is at epidemic levels and the vast majority of the new jobs that have been “created” in recent years have been low paying jobs.  Of those Americans that do have a job at this point, one out of every four works a job that pays $10 an hour or less.

#3 The “working poor” is a group that is rapidly growing in this country.  If you can believe it, the United States actually has a higher percentage of workers doing low wage work than any other major industrialized nation does.

#4 Over the past several decades, the percentage of low income jobs has steadily increased.  Back in 1980, less than 30% of all jobs in the United States were low income jobs.  Today, more than 40% of all jobs in the United States are low income jobs.

#5 The way that our economic system is structured today, almost all of the economic rewards go to the very top of the food chain.  The following is how income gains in the United States were distributed during 2010….

-37 percent of all income gains went to the top 0.01 percent of all income earners

-56 percent of all income gains went to the rest of the top 1 percent

-7 percent of all income gains went to the bottom 99 percent

#6 Several decades ago, there was a much more even distribution of income in this country.  Back in the 1970s, the top 1 percent of all income earners brought in about 8 percent of all income.  Today, they bring in about 21 percent of all income.

#7 As the middle class shrinks, the number of “low income” and “poor” Americans is rapidly rising.  Today, approximately 48 percent of all Americans are currently either considered to be “low income” or are living in poverty.

#8 Manufacturing jobs once enabled huge numbers of Americans to enjoy a middle class lifestyle.  Unfortunately, those jobs are leaving this country at a breathtaking pace.  Back in 1940, 23.4% of all American workers had manufacturing jobs.  Today, only 10.4% of all American workers have manufacturing jobs.

#9 In the old days, any man that was willing to work hard and wanted a job could get one.  Today, there are millions of American men sitting on their couches at home wondering why nobody will hire them.  Back in 1950, more than 80 percent of all men in the United States had jobs.  Today, less than 65 percent of all men in the United States have jobs.

#10 The middle class is shrinking at the same time that America is getting poorer as a nation.  In the middle of the last century, the United States was #1 in the world in GDP per capita.  Today, the United States is #13 in GDP per capita.

#11 Every year now, we see millions of Americans fall out of the middle class.  In 2010, 2.6 million more Americans descended into poverty.  That was the largest increase that we have seen since the U.S. government began keeping statistics on this back in 1959.

#12 The shrinking middle class is having a disproportionate impact on children.  At this point, approximately 22 percent of all American children are living in poverty.

#13 In the old days, most Americans grew up in middle class neighborhoods.  Sadly, this is no longer true.  In 1970, 65 percent of all Americans lived in “middle class neighborhoods”.  By 2007, only 44 percent of all Americans lived in “middle class neighborhoods”.

#14 The concentration of wealth at the very top of the food chain is astounding.  Right now, over 50 percent of all stocks and bonds are owned by just 1 percent of the U.S. population.

#15 When you concentrate too much power in the hands of the federal government and the big corporations, it is inevitable that massive amounts of wealth will become concentrated in just a few hands.  In the United States today, the wealthiest one percent of all Americans have a greater net worth than the bottom 90 percent combined.

#16 There is nothing wrong with making money, but there is something wrong with a game where individuals and small businesses cannot compete fairly.  According to Forbes, the 400 wealthiest Americans now have more wealth than the bottom 150 million Americans combined.

#17 When the number of poor people rapidly expands in a society, that is a recipe for social unrest.  At this point, the poorest 50 percent of all Americans collectively own just 2.5% of all the wealth in the United States.

#18 The hidden tax of inflation is absolutely devastating middle class families all over America.  Since 1970, the U.S. dollar has lost more than 83 percent of its value.  Any dollars that middle class families try to save are constantly losing a little bit more value every single day.

#19 American workers that try to play by the rules find that they are constantly fighting a losing battle.  According to one study, between 1969 and 2009 the median wages earned by American men between the ages of 30 and 50 dropped by 27 percent after you account for inflation.

#20 In recent years, many middle class families have seen their paychecks get smaller.  Median household income in the United States has fallen 7.8 percent since December 2007 after adjusting for inflation.

#21 In recent years, many middle class families have seen many of their basic expenses absolutely soar.  For example, health insurance costs have risen by 23 percent since Barack Obama became president.

#22 Just turning on the lights and heating their homes has become a major burden for many middle class families.  Electricity bills in the United States have risen faster than the overall rate of inflation for five years in a row.

#23 Just putting gas in the car has become a major financial ordeal for millions of hard working Americans.  The average price of a gallon of gasoline in the United States has increased by more than 100 percent since Barack Obama became president.

#24 Sadly, government dependence is now at an all-time high, and that is the way that many among the elite like it.  When Barack Obama took office, there were 32 million Americans on food stamps.  Now, there are more than 46 million Americans on food stamps.  In particular, an astounding number of children are on food stamps right now.  At this point, approximately one-fourth of all American children are enrolled in the food stamp program.

#25 Many middle class families will not be in the middle class for too much longer.  According to a shocking new study from the National Bureau of Economic Research, 200,000 U.S. households will use the money from their tax refunds this year “to pay for bankruptcy filing and legal fees“.

Unless major changes are made on a national level, the middle class is going to continue to disappear.

If you are playing the game the way that the system tells you to play it and you expect to live a middle class lifestyle for many years to come there is a good chance that you will be deeply disappointed at some point.

Millions upon millions of Americans have done everything that the system told them to do and the system has still failed them.  They got good grades all the way through school, they went to college, they worked really hard, they stayed out of trouble and they gave everything they could to their employers.  In spite of all that, millions of hard working families have still lost their jobs and their homes in recent years.

Do not trust that the system will take care of you, and you should not trust that the government will take care of you either.

We don’t need the federal government to hand out more money to everyone.  Government handouts are already at record levels and the government is not even coming close to paying for all of this reckless spending.

More government spending is not going to solve any of our problems.

Instead, what we need is an environment where the size and power of the federal government is limited and the size and the power of the big corporations is limited.  We need an environment where individuals and small businesses can thrive and compete fairly.

Unfortunately, neither major political party is going to move us in that direction, so there is not much hope for solutions on the national level any time soon.

On an individual level, we can all learn how to prepare for the very difficult years that are coming.  It is imperative that we all work to become more independent of the system, because the system could fail at any time.

If you have blind faith that your job will always be there and that the federal government will rescue you if the economy crashes then you are likely to be bitterly disappointed at some point.

The truth is that our economy is slowly dying and the great American middle class is being systematically wiped out.

Many of the things that worked in the past are not going to work any longer.

You can choose to adapt or you can suffer the consequences.

Our world is rapidly changing, and we all need to prepare for what is coming.

New bill could allow federal government to prevent Americans who owe back taxes from leaving the country

Owe the IRS? You’re Not Going Anywhere

“to reauthorize Federal-aid highway and highway safety construction programs, and for other purposes.”

FOXBusiness | Apr 5, 2012

By Diane Macedo

A new bill making its way through Congress could allow the federal government to prevent Americans who owe back taxes from leaving the country.

The provision is part of Senate Bill 1813, which was introduced by Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) in November and passed by the Senate on March 14 “to reauthorize Federal-aid highway and highway safety construction programs, and for other purposes.”

Those “other purposes” have come to include a little-known amendment recently introduced by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid that would allow the State Department to revoke, deny or limit passports for anyone the Internal Revenue Service certifies as having “a seriously delinquent tax debt in an amount in excess of $50,000.”

While the provision does make exceptions if the debt “is being paid in a timely manner” or “in emergency circumstances or for humanitarian reasons,” it doesn’t require that a person be charged with tax evasion before having their passport revoked — only that the IRS has filed a notice of lien or levy against them.

Constitutional Attorney Angel Reyes says that’s a violation of due process and is unconstitutional.

Tax Debt? Feds Want Your Passport

IRS Debtor’s Prison Closer to Becoming a Reality

Congress Debates Imprisoning Taxpayers Who Owe the IRS Within Our Borders

“It takes away your right to enter or exit the country based upon a non-judicial IRS determination that you owe taxes,” Reyes told FOX Business. “It’s a scary thought that our congressional representatives want to give the IRS the power to detain US citizens over taxes, which could very well be in dispute.”

Financial Adviser Clark Hodges says the measure is especially concerning given the high number of taxpayers it could affect.

“There are so many people that fall into that situation, and I think that’s too invasive. Especially coming out of a bad economy there are a lot of people behind on a lot of things,” he told Fox Business.

Still, the “Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act” or “MAP-21″ passed the Senate in a vote of 74-22, and is now headed for the GOP-controlled house where it’s expected to meet stronger opposition.

Boxer’s office declined to comment on the passport provision when contacted by Fox Business, but the Senator vowed last week to do everything in her power to get the bill across the finish line.

“Thousands of businesses are at stake, and eventually we are talking about nearly three million jobs at stake,” she said in a statement. “There are many people on both sides of the aisle in the Senate who want to get our bill, MAP-21, passed into law, and I am going to do everything I can to keep the pressure on the Republican House to do just that.”

Niels Lesniewski, Editor of CQ SenateWatch, says legally the provision has precedent on its side.

“Existing law says that passports may not be reviewed for applicants owing child support in excess of $2,500. So I think supporters would say: ‘You can’t get a passport if you don’t pay child support, but you can get a passport if you don’t pay taxes?” he said.

As for the MAP-21’s prospects of passing the House, Lesniewski says it’s hard to tell if it will withstand Republican opposition, but he believes the passport provision has a good chance at becoming law for one reason: money.

“This provision is expected to raise almost $750 million in the 10-year window that they do the budget,” he said. “I think it will get passed eventually, and not necessarily as part of the transportation bill, but it seems like relatively low hanging fruit.”

Senator Reid’s office did not respond to requests for comment.

Police warn of 24-hour ticket blitz

Announcement a shot in union battle over quota

norwichbulletin.com | Apr 4, 2012

By Don Bond

Danielson, Conn. — The Connecticut State Police Union took the unusual step Tuesday of warning motorists of what the union claims will be a 24-hour ticket blitz today in the northeastern Connecticut territory covered by the Danielson barracks.

The union’s warning indicated the ticket blitz will run from midnight through 11:59 p.m. today in the 13 northeastern Connecticut towns the barracks patrols.

The warning is part of the union’s ongoing battle with state police administrators, claiming the efforts by barracks commanders to increase enforcement efforts by writing more tickets is creating a quota system.

It cites a memo issued by the commanding officer of Troop I in Bethany who, on March 30, told his troopers they needed to write “at least 60 infraction/misdemeanor tickets on each of the troop’s three shifts for a total of 180 infractions to outperform both Troop F and Troop G.”

State police administrators have said there is no quota system, and department spokesman Lt. J. Paul Vance has characterized the memo as an effort by a barracks commander to increase enforcement to help prevent accidents.

Vance did not return several calls to his office Wednesday for comment for this story.
While saying troopers are committed to making Connecticut roads safer, the union said it “strongly objects to any quotas or initiatives where the public is targeted as a means of generating revenue for the state.”

The union said Section 29-2(b) of the Connecticut General Statutes prohibits “a specified number for motor vehicle violations to be issued within a specified period of time.” The union also said department policy and state law give troopers the authority to use discretion when enforcing traffic laws.

In its warning, the union cited a memo written by Lt. Timothy Madden, commanding officer at Troop D, who allegedly urged troopers to be “highly productive and perhaps we can be the top dog in the district.”

In its news release, the union claims its members were “alarmed and spoke out against this action to no avail.”

“State police union members are committed to making the roads and highways of this state as safe as possible,” the news release concludes. “However, we believe this can be better accomplished through a combination of public awareness announcements and appropriate enforcement action, not through a process of competition and rewards.”

The news release did not attribute the union’s comments to Sgt. Andrew Matthews, union president, or to any other officer of the union.

Read more

US-Funded Afghan Air Force Suspected of Drug Running: Report

ABC | Mar 8, 2012

The U.S. government has reportedly launched a pair of probes to determine whether Afghan officials have been using military planes — much of which paid for by the U.S. — to illegally smuggle guns and drugs around the country.

According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, both the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency and the U.S.-led coalition forces in Afghanistan are separately investigating suspected illicit activities carried out under the noses of U.S. military advisers and possibly with the knowledge of high Afghan officials.

Suspicions about alleged corruption in the Afghan Air Force (AAF) were disclosed publicly in January in a U.S. Air Force special investigation report on the murder of eight U.S. Air Force personnel and one contractor by an Afghan officer who later turned his gun on himself in the Kabul airport in April 2011. The shooter in that case was identified as Col. Ahmed Gul, a cargo and passenger coordinator for the AAF with reported financial and mental problems.

In the Air Force report, two witnesses stated they believed the AAF to be a hotbed of “nefarious” activity where Afghan officials could make quick money by ferrying people or cargo around the country — often with little or no screening.

Related

U.S. Funded, Trained and Equipped Afghan Air Force Running Guns and Drugs

“There is a distinct lack of transparency in the way the Afghan Ministry of Defense [and the] AAF like to schedule and fly their missions,” one witness, only identified as a Lieutenant Colonel, says in the report. “The Afghans either don’t know or don’t want to tell us who or what they’re flying around the country. All this looks very suspicious to the NATO Air Training Command-Afghanistan mentors who have been in country for more than a few months.”

Specifically, the witnesses said the Afghan air officers would be paid directly to usher top Afghan officials around at the last minute. In its report today, The Wall Street Journal quoted U.S. Army Lt. Gen. Daniel Bolger as saying the current allegations also include the transport of narcotics and weapons “for the use of private groups” within Afghanistan. The United Nations estimates that Afghanistan is home to 90 percent of the world’s opium — the main ingredient in heroin.

Though the Air Force investigation did not find a singular motive for Gul’s sudden attack, when the shooting took place a new system “was being developed to ensure [AAF] flights were officially tasked through a legitimate [AAF] process…” the Air Force report said.

In a statement to ABC News, the U.S.-led International Security Assistance Force said today it is working with its Afghan partners to “arrest and reverse criminal penetration in the [Afghan National Security Forces] and to ensure security ministries and their forces become sufficiently resistant to and insulated from criminal network interference and subversion.”

“ISAF takes seriously any allegation of impropriety on the part of its forces or those of the Afghan National Security Forces we mentor and partner with,” the statement said. The statement noted that in the last year, 50 “criminal actors” had been discovered in the security forces.

A DEA spokesperson told ABC News that by policy, the administration does not confirm or deny any potential ongoing investigations. A spokesperson for the AAF and Afghanistan’s Minister of Defense, Gen. Abdul Rahim Wardak, told The Wall Street Journal they were unaware of the investigations. The AAF spokesperson denied the allegations.

German tax levy on Belgian Nazi slave labourers provokes fury


A decision by Germany to levy a tax on pensions received by Belgians who were slave labourers for the Nazi regime during the Second World War has provoked fury among survivors.

Telegraph | Nov 21, 2011

By Bruno Waterfield, Brussels

Last week demands for hundreds of euros from tax authorities in the German state of Brandenburg began to land on the doormats of surviving “dwangarbeiders” or their widows.

“It hits me not only financially but emotionally,” Simone De Vos, 84, the widow of a forced labourer told the Gazet Van Antwerpen.

“My late husband had anxiety attacks for decades after his time in Germany. It is outrageous that the Germans now want money back.”

According to media reports in Belgium, the German authorities last year passed a law stating that pensions for former slave labourers would be taxed at the rate of 17 per cent.

The tax has been applied retroactively from 2005 meaning those Belgian survivors of Nazism or their widows awarded pensions by Germany as a form compensation now face large bills.

Tony Vandersteen, the ombudsman of the Belgian pension department, confirmed that dozens of former forced labourers or their widows have complained.

He has advised the pensioners that “there is not a lot he can do” and recommended that people “contact the German authorities in order to try to obtain a discount”.

In late 1942 the Nazis launched a programme of forced labour in the occupied countries in order to keep the German war industry going. Millions of people were forced to work in Germany, including 200,000 Belgians, in slave labour conditions.

It is not known if French, Dutch, Italian, Polish or other survivors will face tax bills on their pensions.

Ahmed Laaouej, a Belgian senator, has demanded that Didier Reynders, Belgium’s finance minister, registers a protest over the “unacceptable” tax demands with Germany.

“The minister must immediately contact the German authorities. And I would also like to know if the Belgian government has been informed in advance of the decision,” he said.