
A computer monitor viewed by a Transportation Security Administration TSA officer reveals details of the body of a fully-clothed employee of L3 Communications Security and Detection Systems as she is scanned inside a ProVision whole body imaging machine at Los Angeles International Airport.
Pictures: AFP
Related
- Airport strip-search machines “tear apart DNA”
- Airport scanners ‘will show private parts’
- EU to introduce ‘virtual strip searches’ at airports by 2010
- Airport security guards to observe sex organs of men, women and children
- Brit Cops Take Airport Scanners to the Street
Graphic scanners leave no bone unturned
Airports in New York and Los Angeles have become the latest equipped with body scanners that allow security screeners to peer beneath a passenger’s clothing to detect concealed weapons.
The machines, which are about the size of a revolving door, use low-energy electromagnetic waves to produce a computerised image of a traveller’s entire body.
Passengers step in and lift their arms. The scans only take a minute, and Transportation Security Administration officials say the procedure is less invasive than a physical frisk for knives, bombs or guns.
Someday, the “millimetre wave” scans might replace metal detectors, but for now they are being used selectively.
Los Angeles International Airport and John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York saw their first scanners installed on Thursday, each at a single checkpoint. Phoenix Sky-Harbor International Airport got one of the machines in October.
Modest travellers may have concerns about the images.
The black and white, three-dimensional scans aren’t as vivid as a photograph, but they do reveal some of the more intimate curves of the human form, maybe with as much clarity as an impressionist sculpture by Auguste Rodin.
TSA officials say the system comes with privacy protections. Officers reviewing the images don’t interact with passengers, or even see them. They sit in a separate area, look at the pictures on a monitor and push a button to either clear travellers or alert security about a suspicious item.
Images will not be recorded or stored. Passenger faces are blurred to further protect their identities.
For now, the scans will also be voluntary. Flyers selected for a secondary screening after passing through the metal detectors will have the option of stepping into the wave scanner, rather than undergoing a physical pat-down.
“We’re giving people a choice,” said TSA spokeswoman Lara Uselding.
Barry Steinhardt, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s program on technology and liberty, said he nevertheless had concerns.
“The images that I’ve seen are quite revealing,” he said. “I guarantee you that as this gets more commonly used, you’ll be seeing these images on the Internet.”
The TSA said millimetre wave scanners, which cost as much as $US120,000 ($128,000) apiece, are already in limited use at international airports in seven countries and at a handful of courthouses and jails in five states.
Their introduction to US airports is on a trial basis while authorities evaluate their effectiveness. The TSA said the devices pose no health risk and project 10,000 times less energy than a mobile phone transmission.
13 responses so far ↓
wil // April 18, 2008 at 8:22 pm
“We’re giving people a choice,” said TSA spokeswoman Lara Uselding.
Yeah whatever. I’ll get back to them after my chip fitting.
wil // April 20, 2008 at 5:20 pm
Yeah Brad or Britney’s airscan hits the net–another engineered distraction while the tanks unload from the airports.
Ghislaine Laurendeau // April 26, 2008 at 7:58 pm
About :
More airports using virtual strip-search machines to observe naked bodies
Geez…why always use women body for that kind of image…..why not a man for a change. Or use both.!!!
Natalie // April 26, 2008 at 8:39 pm
There’s free porn all over internet. Why would someone get off on these blurry grey pictures?
Get a life!
pjwalker911 // April 26, 2008 at 11:50 pm
Natalie, yer an idiot.
Ads111111 // May 19, 2009 at 1:59 pm
pjwalker911 YOU are the idiot
pjwalker911 // May 20, 2009 at 5:23 am
Oh really Ads111111? How so?
Livia // May 25, 2009 at 11:23 am
It’s much better that real body search and have no human contact. I don’t care what the Airport officer will see on the scanner as long as I will be safe on the plane. It’s a good idea and saved people from real contact. I think their also should be scanner who would see through the skin(for drug containers search). I live in Israel and bags search is a part of my every day life. I would never complain about search, because this way people can be safe and terrorist would not have access to malls, shops, official offices. In airports people should think about their own safety and not about discomfort of being seen naked on the bad gray picture.
antonio // June 15, 2009 at 5:57 pm
yes of course this is going to be abused and used for porn purpouses, porn is always looking for new girls, there is a multi million dollar market in porn for hidden camera shots, and all kinds of other sick crap. one of the employees will surely, abuse this of course, the number one reason for money lost in a business is employee theft. so yes of course some employee is going to abuse this and make money on the side through selling these pics of “new” girls to porn sites. my suggestion is if you get this scan immediately complain and ask them to delete you photo, they probably will do it if you ask nicely.
Wolf34 // October 22, 2009 at 8:24 pm
This metaphor applies only to verbal actions that can be construed as Non-Completable. ,
Scanner // December 30, 2009 at 12:24 am
I think these are sexy. Just thinking about it gives me a boner. Wonder how it would look like in one of these scanners.
WWR UK // December 30, 2009 at 12:33 pm
Amsterdam Airport is ready to use the world’s first unmanned high tech body screen system. The system alarms automatically and blocks passenger to boarding.
Schiphol has 15 systems already installed at gates
The aiport still awaits for approval by the EU-commission
Boycott Airport Bodyscanners? Violate Privacy? Protect against Terrorism? | elephant journal // January 7, 2010 at 1:18 am
[...] radioactive, that they “tear apart” DNA, and that they’re a bit…perverse—showing private parts and ghostly naked [...]