Elder Bush sees ‘ugliness’ in attacks on Obama

U.S. President Barack Obama is introduced to speak by former President George H.W. Bush at the Points of Light forum at Texas A&M University in College Station, Texas October 16, 2009. Reuters Pictures

AP | Oct 19, 2009

COLLEGE STATION, Texas — Former President George H.W. Bush doesn’t like the “ugliness” President Barack Obama has faced since taking office, but he thinks it’s no worse than his son experienced and is not about Obama being black.

Bush, who was hosting Obama at a volunteerism forum here Friday, said the tone of the criticism “crosses the line of civility.”

“To the degree it turns off one student or young person from serving, that’s bad,” Bush said in an interview with CBS News Radio at his presidential library. “It should not happen.”

President Barack Obama greets students as he is introduced by former President George H.W. Bush (not shown) at the start of the Points of Light Institute forum at Texas A&M University in College Station, Texas, Friday, Oct. 16, 2009. AP Photo

But Bush stressed that conservatives aren’t the only ones to blame. Liberal pundits heaped similar scorn on his son, former President George W. Bush.

“They just hammered him mercilessly — and I think obscenely — a lot of the time,” he said.

Former President Jimmy Carter recently asserted that much of the bitterness aimed at Obama stemmed from his being the nation’s first black president.

Obama disagreed.

The elder Bush said, “You might find some racists out there but I don’t think the attacks per se have to do that he’s an African-American.”

Bush, who turned 85 in June, said presidents throughout history have suffered at the hands of critics.

“I’m reluctant to say it’s a whole new thing in politics — this ugliness,” he said. “I mean you go back to Grover Cleveland … It was terrible the things that people said.”

Benito Mussolini got started with help of British secret service

Recruited by MI5: the name’s Mussolini.

Benito Mussolini. Mussolini was paid £100 a week by MI5 to keep Italy in the first world war.

Documents reveal Italian dictator got start in politics in 1917 with help of £100 weekly wage from MI5

guardian.co.uk | Oct 13, 2009

by Tom Kington in Rome

History remembers Benito Mussolini as a founder member of the original Axis of Evil, the Italian dictator who ruled his country with fear and forged a disastrous alliance with Nazi Germany. But a previously unknown area of Il Duce’s CV has come to light: his brief career as a British agent.

Archived documents have revealed that Mussolini got his start in politics in 1917 with the help of a £100 weekly wage from MI5.

For the British intelligence agency, it must have seemed like a good investment. Mussolini, then a 34-year-old journalist, was not just willing to ensure Italy continued to fight alongside the allies in the first world war by publishing propaganda in his paper. He was also willing to send in the boys to “persuade” peace protesters to stay at home.

Mussolini’s payments were authorised by Sir Samuel Hoare, an MP and MI5’s man in Rome, who ran a staff of 100 British intelligence officers in Italy at the time.

Cambridge historian Peter Martland, who discovered details of the deal struck with the future dictator, said: “Britain’s least reliable ally in the war at the time was Italy after revolutionary Russia’s pullout from the conflict. Mussolini was paid £100 a week from the autumn of 1917 for at least a year to keep up the pro-war campaigning – equivalent to about £6,000 a week today.”

Hoare, later to become Lord Templewood, mentioned the recruitment in memoirs in 1954, but Martland stumbled on details of the payments for the first time while scouring Hoare’s papers.

Mussolini In Power

As well as keeping the presses rolling at Il Popolo d’Italia, the newspaper he edited, Mussolini also told Hoare he would send Italian army veterans to beat up peace protesters in Milan, a dry run for his fascist blackshirt units.

“The last thing Britain wanted were pro-peace strikes bringing the factories in Milan to a halt. It was a lot of money to pay a man who was a journalist at the time, but compared to the £4m Britain was spending on the war every day, it was petty cash,” said Martland.

“I have no evidence to prove it, but I suspect that Mussolini, who was a noted womaniser, also spent a good deal of the money on his mistresses.”

After the armistice, Mussolini began his rise to power, assisted by electoral fraud and blackshirt violence, establishing a fascist dictorship by the mid-1920s.

His colonial ambitions in Africa brought him into contact with his old paymaster again in 1935. Now the British foreign secretary, Hoare signed the Hoare-Laval pact, which gave Italy control over Abyssinia.

“There is no reason to believe the two men were friends, although Hoare did have an enduring love affair with Italy,” said Martland, whose research is included in Christopher Andrew’s history of MI5, Defence of the Realm, which was published last week.

The unpopularity of the Hoare-Laval pact in Britain forced Hoare to resign. Mussolini, meanwhile, built on his new colonial clout to ally with Hitler, entering the second world war in 1940, this time to fight against the allies.

Deposed following the allied invasion of Italy in 1943, Mussolini was killed with his mistress, Clara Petacci, by Italian partisans while fleeing Italy in an attempt to reach Switzerland two years later.

Martland said: “Mussolini ended his life hung upside down in Milan, but history has not been kind to Hoare either, condemned as an appeaser of fascism alongside Neville Chamberlain.”

Queen ‘appalled’ at Church of England moves, claim Vatican moles

When Pope Benedict visits this country next year, he is expected to stay at Buckingham Palace as a guest of the Queen. The warmth of her welcome will come as no surprise to the Pontiff, if senior sources at the Vatican are to be believed.

Telegraph | Oct 8, 2009

By Richard Eden

According to informants quoted in The Catholic Herald, the Queen has “grown increasingly sympathetic” to the Catholic Church over the years while being “appalled”, along with the Prince of Wales, at developments in the Church of England.

The usually well-informed newspaper adds that the Queen, who is the Supreme Governor of the C of E, is “also said to have an affinity with the Holy Father, who is of her generation”.

In July, The Sunday Telegraph disclosed that the Queen had told the heads of a traditionalist group, formed in response to the liberal direction of some parts of the Anglican Communion, that she “understood their concerns” about the future of the 80 million-strong global church.

One leading evangelical said: “We found the letters very supportive.”

Her intervention was predicted to have surprised many because the group, called the Fellowship of Confessing Anglicans, was feared by some to be a divisive force and one of its senior figures was this accused of being homophobic.

The then Bishop of Rochester, Dr Michael Nazir-Ali, called on homosexuals to repent. He said the Church of England must stick to the Biblical teaching that marriage should only be between a man and a woman.

“We want to hold on to the traditional teaching of the Church,” he said. “We don’t want to be rolled over by culture and trends in the Church,” said the bishop, who was one of the most senior religious figures in England.

A Buckingham Palace spokesman declines to comment.

World Bank welcomes New Economic Order from the ashes of crisis

China and India set to become established global powers

Euro and renminbi tipped to join dollar as reserve currencies

Observer | Oct 4, 2009

by Larry Elliott in Istanbul

The wrenching financial crisis of the past two years will provide the catalyst for a profound change in the global economy – which, according to the man running the World Bank, will see China and India become established centres of power, the dollar eclipsed as the sole reserve currency, and Latin America, south-east Asia and Africa emerge as new sources of growth.

But as he surveys the wreckage caused by what the bank and its sister organisation, the International Monetary Fund, agree is the most severe crisis since the devastation caused by the second world war, Robert Zoellick is surprisingly upbeat about the future.

Asked by the Observer how he envisages the global economy in 20 years’ time, Zoellick says: “There will certainly be a larger role for the emerging powers, there will be multipolar sources of growth, there will be more south-south trade between developing countries.

“The crisis gives us the opportunity to hasten this process. If we are concerned about the past reliance for growth on the US consumer, we have to make sure consumers in developing countries have enough finance to buy.”

Zoellick says that, while this does not mean the end of the US as a big player on the world stage, it has brought the curtain down on the unipolar world that followed the collapse of communism 20 years ago.

Developing countries were on the rise before the credit crunch and, as the latest snapshot of the global economy released last week illustrates, their position has been strengthened by their ability to keep growing as the west teetered on the brink of a 1930s-style Depression.

“We have reached a tipping point in global economic affairs,” says Stephen King, chief economist of HSBC. “While there are some encouraging signs of recovery in the developed world, the real economic action is taking place elsewhere. For both cyclical and structural reasons, the emerging nations are set to dominate world economic activity in the years ahead.”

America, Zoellick says, can no longer rely on the dollar ruling the roost. The euro and the Chinese renminbi are candidates to become reserve currencies.

Tellingly, this year’s annual meetings of the Bank and Fund take place in Istanbul, the point where Europe meets Asia and for almost two millennia a melting pot for cultures and religions. The view of both Zoellick and Dominique Strauss-Kahn, managing director of the IMF, is that there is a discernible shift in power and influence eastwards.

“These annual meetings take place at a defining moment in global governance,” Strauss-Kahn says. “We have experienced unparalleled economic co-operation in the last 12 months. It has never happened in history.”

While noting that there is a risk of the consensus vanishing now the immediate threat of economic meltdown has receded, Strauss-Kahn says it is the will of world leaders to continue collaborating in the years ahead. The days of the G7 – an elite gathering of policymakers from the US, Britain, Japan, Germany, France, Italy and Canada – are over. Power has shifted to the G20, which includes the G7 plus a number of leading developing countries such as China, India, Mexico, Brazil and South Africa.

John Hawksworth, head of macro-economics at PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) in the UK, says political influence will result from the increased economic clout of the big developing countries. Within two decades, he says, China may have overtaken the US as the world’s biggest economy once the lower cost of living is taken into account. “The E7 [Emerging Seven] – China, India, Brazil, Russia, Turkey, Indonesia and Mexico – could be a lot bigger than the current G7,” he adds.

PwC estimates that the global economy will double in size by the end of the 2020s to $143tn (£90tn) at today’s prices, with the E7 accounting for almost 40% of GDP and the G7 30%. “The E7 is already not that far behind the G7 and that process has been accelerated by the current crisis, which has hit the developed world harder than the big emerging economies,” says Hawksworth.

Like Zoellick, he thinks the dollar will no longer be the dominant currency. “The dollar, the euro and the renminbi will form a basket of currencies. The world will be different. The recession has accelerated that process.”

The IMF and the World Bank are still set in their original mould, he says. “Voting shares are going to have to change and it will be a gradual process. But it is possible that there will be a Chinese head of the fund or bank by that time.”

Such an outcome would symbolise the changing of the guard. There has been a gentlemen’s agreement that the head of the World Bank should be chosen by the Americans, the single biggest shareholder in the two institutions, while the managing director of the fund is picked by the Europeans. Zoellick is a former US trade representative; Strauss-Kahn was once France’s finance minister.

“There is an inevitability about this [shift in power to Asia],” says Hawksworth. “You can already see it in the business world, as witnessed by the HSBC decision. The centre of economic gravity is shifting and will continue to shift.”

Zoellick says the spread of prosperity to the poor parts of Asia, Latin America and Africa will be accelerated by investment in infrastructure, social safety nets and manufacturing.

Critics say the bank and the fund have too rosy a view of the future. One threat, recognised by the IMF, is that the 3.1% growth pencilled in for 2010 following the first year of global economic contraction since 1945 will prove a false dawn. Once the artificial stimulus of public borrowing wears off, the fear is that a rationing of credit by enfeebled banks will prevent the private sector from taking up the baton.

Another issue is the willingness of the old world to cede power. The IMF and World Bank were set up at the Bretton Woods conference in 1944 and their governance still reflects the dynamics of the 1940s. Reforms are being undertaken, but they are neither radical nor rapid enough to satisfy campaigners.

Peter Chowla of the Bretton Woods Project, a London-based NGO, says the changes amount to a “lick of paint on rotten foundations”.

Finally, there are those who believe the determination of the bank and fund to return as quickly as possible to the high levels of growth seen earlier this decade ignores the elephant in the room – that, by 2029, traditional fossil fuel stocks will be running dry.

Andrew Simms, head of policy at the New Economics Foundation thinktank, says: “One major thing that will describe the landscape in 2029 is that we will be beyond the point of peak oil. That will be the trigger for so many dominoes to fall.” Decisions made in the next few years, he adds, will be critical. “There is the risk of enormous knock-on effects on trade and food supply, with the food price volatility of the last year looking like a vicar’s tea party.”

He believes food security will replace gross domestic product as the yardstick of success, and there will be an emphasis on the new “three Rs” – reduce, repair, recycle.

In one respect, Zoellick, Strauss-Kahn and Simms are in full agreement: decisions taken in the next two or three years will shape the next two or three decades.

“We are balanced on a knife edge,” Simms says. “The potentialities are wonderful; the probabilities deeply disturbing.”

Glenn Beck Warns of ‘Reichstag Event’

Glenn Beck Exclusive: Warns of ‘Reichstag Event’

Newsmax | Sep 29, 2009

Media phenomenon Glenn Beck recently sat down with Newsmax for an exclusive interview offering his take on everything from President Obama, to the threat to talk radio and even a worry that our Constitutional government may disappear after a “Reichstag” event takes place.

The candid, wide-ranging interview appears in the October issue of Newsmax magazine, and is included in the special report “Glenn Beck Wants You!” that takes an in-depth look at the TV host whose Fox News show has been breaking ratings records since it burst on the scene in January.

Beck, who is also thriving on the radio, in bookstores and on the comedy circuit, sat down with Newsmax magazine’s Editor in Chief Christopher Ruddy and voiced his concerns about a coming attack on talk radio.

But his real worry is that many Washington elitists really don’t like our form of government and want to see it abolished.

“I fear a Reichstag moment,” he said, referring to the 1933 burning of Germany’s parliament building in Berlin that the Nazis blamed on communists and Hitler used as an excuse to suspend constitutional liberties and consolidate power.

“God forbid, another 9/11. Something that will turn this machine on, and power will be seized and voices will be silenced.”

Beck has also been a fierce critic of President Obama. Still, he said he’s open to a meeting with Obama. Beck doesn’t believe the president “necessarily would” speak directly to him, adding: “I don’t know very many politicians that speak directly.”

Beck also talked to Newsmax about his critics, his best-selling book “Common Sense,” his condemnation of George W. Bush’s presidency, government control of the media and “the only thing that will save this country.”

Firefighter lit fires so he could put them out

The Age | Oct 2, 2009

by ADRIAN LOWE

Arsonist Jarred Brewer. Photo: Angela Wylie

VOLUNTEER firefighter Jarred Brewer had never seen a bushfire and as a junior in his brigade, was restless.

To get a chance at fighting a fire and getting a ride on a truck, he made hoax phone calls to triple-zero to have local Country Fire Authority brigades stretched to a point where they called junior officers to attend scenes.

On four occasions between May last year and January this year, Brewer, a member of the Darraweit Guim CFA brigade, made 16 false calls – as many as six in one day.

He also lit bushfires over summer months; in Clonbinane and Wallan on November 12 and Christmas Day last year and January 15 this year.

Brewer, 20, pleaded guilty in the County Court yesterday to 19 charges – three of intentionally lighting a bushfire and 16 of making false calls to emergency services.

Judge Tony Duckett said of Brewer’s offending: ”It’s just something he took delight in doing. He couldn’t get on all those trucks.

”[But] the consequence could have been the death of another person if the [emergency] facility didn’t reach them.”

In one call, Brewer claimed a house was alight after its Christmas tree had toppled over. In others, he told authorities serious car crashes had occurred or fires had started in homes throughout Clonbinane, Kilmore and Wallan.

In each call, Brewer left a false name and phone number, or no number. Before making each call, he removed the SIM card from the phone in an attempt to go undetected, prosecutor Gavin Silbert, SC, said.

On Christmas Day, Brewer drove to Mount Disappointment and set fire to parkland by emptying a diesel can. Fire investigators found used and unused aerosol cans, matches and electric sparklers at the scene.

Defence lawyer Sandra Lacy said: ”To be on the firetruck appears to be something that he wanted to do.

”What it might be interpreted as is an attempt to exhaust services of other areas so he gets on a truck … and gets that experience on a truck.”

Mr Silbert said an immediate jail term of at least three years was sought.

Giving evidence, clinical psychiatrist Dr Geoffrey Cummins said Brewer was ‘’shocked he could be regarded as an arsonist”.

She said the 20-year-old did not have the same comprehension of his offending as an ordinary person would, due in part to an intellectual disability.

”I would not expect him to reoffend,” Dr Cummins said.

In an ill-fated application for Brewer’s name and home address to be suppressed, Judge Duckett told Ms Lacy: ”I don’t think there’s any possibility your client will be returning to that address for some time.”

Judge Duckett adjourned to sentencing to a date to be fixed so a report could be obtained to assess Brewer’s suitability for a youth justice centre.

But, he emphasised, that did not mean Brewer would serve his sentence in such a centre.

Gore Vidal: ‘We’ll have a dictatorship soon in the US’

The grand old man of letters Gore Vidal claims America is ‘rotting away’ — and don’t expect Barack Obama to save it

The “War on Terror” was “made up”, Vidal says. “The whole thing was PR, just like ‘weapons of mass destruction’.

London Times | Sep 30, 2009

A conversation with Gore Vidal unfolds at his pace. He answers questions imperiously, occasionally playfully, with a piercing, lethal dryness. He is 83 and in a wheelchair (a result of hypothermia suffered in the war, his left knee is made of titanium). But he can walk (“Of course I can”) and after a recent performance of Mother Courage at London’s National Theatre he stood to deliver an anti-war speech to the audience.

How was his friend Fiona Shaw in the title role? “Very good.” Where did they meet? Silence. The US? “Well, it wasn’t Russia.” What’s he writing at the moment? “It’s a little boring to talk about. Most writers seem to do little else but talk about themselves and their work, in majestic terms.” He means self-glorifying? “You’ve stumbled on the phrase,” he says, regally enough. “Continue to use it.”

Vidal is sitting in the Connaught Hotel in Mayfair, where he has been coming to stay for 60 years. He is wearing a brown suit jacket, brown jumper, tracksuit bottoms; his white hair twirled into a Tintin-esque quiff and with his hooded eyes, delicate yet craggy features and arch expression, he looks like Quentin Crisp, but accessorised with a low, lugubrious growl rather than camp lisp.

He points to an apartment opposite the hotel where Churchill stayed during the Second World War, as Downing Street was “getting hammered by the Nazis. The crowds would cheer him from the street, he knew great PR.” In a flash, this memory reminds you of the swathe of history Vidal has experienced with great intimacy: he was friends with JFK, fought in the war, his father Gene, an Olympic decathlete and aeronautics teacher, founded TWA among other airlines and had a relationship with Amelia Earhart. (Vidal first flew and landed a plane when he was 10.) He was a screenwriter for MGM in the dying days of the studio system, toyed with being a politician, he has written 24 novels and is hailed as one of the world’s greatest essayists.

He has crossed every boundary, I say. “Crashed many barriers,” he corrects me.

Last year he famously switched allegiance from Hillary Clinton to Barack Obama during the Democratic nomination process for president. Now, he reveals, he regrets his change of heart. How’s Obama doing? “Dreadfully. I was hopeful. He was the most intelligent person we’ve had in that position for a long time. But he’s inexperienced. He has a total inability to understand military matters. He’s acting as if Afghanistan is the magic talisman: solve that and you solve terrorism.” America should leave Afghanistan, he says. “We’ve failed in every other aspect of our effort of conquering the Middle East or whatever you want to call it.” The “War on Terror” was “made up”, Vidal says. “The whole thing was PR, just like ‘weapons of mass destruction’. It has wrecked the airline business, which my father founded in the 1930s. He’d be cutting his wrists. Now when you fly you’re both scared to death and bored to death, a most disagreeable combination.”

His voice strengthens. “One thing I have hated all my life are LIARS [he says that with bristling anger] and I live in a nation of them. It was not always the case. I don’t demand honour, that can be lies too. I don’t say there was a golden age, but there was an age of general intelligence. We had a watchdog, the media.” The media is too supine? “Would that it was. They’re busy preparing us for an Iranian war.” He retains some optimism about Obama “because he doesn’t lie. We know the fool from Arizona [as he calls John McCain] is a liar. We never got the real story of how McCain crashed his plane [in 1967 near Hanoi, North Vietnam] and was held captive.”

Vidal originally became pro-Obama because he grew up in “a black city” (meaning Washington), as well as being impressed by Obama’s intelligence. “But he believes the generals. Even Bush knew the way to win a general was to give him another star. Obama believes the Republican Party is a party when in fact it’s a mindset, like Hitler Youth, based on hatred — religious hatred, racial hatred. When you foreigners hear the word ‘conservative’ you think of kindly old men hunting foxes. They’re not, they’re fascists.”

Full Story

Bill Clinton claims ‘rightwing conspiracy’ behind attacks on Obama

Former US president cites conservative activists and media personalities among those behind aggressive campaign against current leader

guardian.co.uk | Sep 27, 2009

by Daniel Nasaw in Washington

Former US President Bill Clinton claimed today that the “vast rightwing conspiracy” that hounded him and nearly drove him from office has set its sights on Barack Obama.

The former president was referring to the web of politicians, media personalities, various internet groups and grassroots conservative activists who have opposed the new president at every turn.

Clinton, the last Democrat to hold the White House before Obama, referred to the term first used by Hillary Clinton in 1998, when she defended Clinton against the Monica Lewinsky scandal that threatened to topple Clinton’s presidency.

She described as a “vast rightwing conspiracy” the forces led by special prosecutor Ken Starr, who spent millions of dollars and several years building a case against Clinton in connection with a failed land deal in Arkansas. The investigation ultimately led to Clinton’s impeachment and trial in the Senate over the Lewinsky affair. He was acquitted.

Asked yesterday on NBC’s Meet the Press whether there was still a rightwing conspiracy, Clinton replied: “You bet. Sure it is. It’s not as strong as it was because America has changed demographically. But it’s as virulent as it was.”

Clinton said that the conspiracy has focused on Obama and, “their agenda seems to be wanting him to fail”.

Clinton’s remarks came after Jimmy Carter, another Democratic former president, said that racism motivates much of the animosity against Obama.

In recent months, legions of furious conservatives, spurred on by some of the same media personalities who led the charge against Clinton, have waged a vicious campaign against Obama, accusing him of being a socialist, a fascist, and a foreign agent out to destroy America. The opposition has become most agitated by his effort to reform the US healthcare system.

Earlier this month, hundreds of thousands of conservatives held a massive anti-Obama rally in Washington. The protesters, who were almost entirely white, carried signs denouncing Obama as a Nazi, a lump of human waste and the Joker from Batman.

Some claimed that Obama was not an American citizen, believing he was born in Kenya or Indonesia. In at least three instances, conservative protesters have turned up at anti-Obama rallies carrying guns. Threats against the president’s life are up 400% from those against former president George W Bush, according to a book by Ronald Kessler.

Many in the Republican party ranks are uncomfortable with the vitriol aimed at Obama. But party leaders have purged most of the moderates from the national leadership, and the rightwingers in power believe the party stands to benefit from a fired-up base.

Meanwhile, the party lacks a strong leader, leaving conservatives to take their cues from radio talk show hosts and others who are not accountable to voters and who do not have to follow up their rhetoric with actual governance.

Clinton said that while the animosity may hurt Obama’s poll numbers, it is not good for the Republicans in the long term. “Fundamentally, he and his team have a positive agenda for America,” he said.

________
Related

‘Vast right-wing conspiracy’ leader’s paper backs Clinton

Hillary denies any Bush-Clinton Dynasty

Bill Clinton rewrites history on support for Iraq war

Murdoch becomes an Obama convert

Murdoch brokered secret truce between Obama and Fox News

Saudis, Blackwater among Clinton foundation donors

Laura Bush defends Michelle Obama, praises Hillary’s grit

Chavez in Friendly Chat with King Who Once Told Him to ‘Shut Up’

VOA News | Sep 11, 2009

The atmosphere during the meeting at the Zarzuela Palace was easier than during an encounter between the two men two years ago, when the king told Mr. Chavez to “shut up” and stop interrupting a speech by Spain’s prime minister.

The exchange between Juan Carlos and the Venezuelan leader took place at an Ibero-American summit in Santiago Chile in November 2007.

Mr. Chavez’s visit to Madrid was the last stop on a nine-country tour. He also met Friday with Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero for talks on economic issues and other topics.

Mr. Zapatero was not Spain’s government chief at the time of the 2007 summit that led to the king’s angry comment. Juan Carlos and Mr. Chavez patched up their differences during another meeting in 2008.

Mr. Chavez arrived in Madrid from Moscow, where he met with top Russian leaders. In comments to reporters there, he accused Spain and other Western governments of distorting facts according to what he called “right-wing” interpretations that portray those who fight for democracy as tyrants, and actual tyrants as democrats.

In addition to his stop in Russia, the Venezuelan leader also visited Algeria, Belarus, Libya, Italy, Iran, Syria and Turkmenistan.

Chávez offers his “friends” King Juan Carlos and Zapatero a relation of “equals”

President Hugo Chávez met on Friday with Spanish Prime Minister, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, and with King Juan Carlos (Photo: AP)

eluniversal.com | Sep 11, 2009

According to the Venezuelan president, the political, economic and social relation between Spain and Venezuela is “very important” and must be undertaken “on a basis of equality, affection and without paying attention to the bearers of lies that exist everywhere”

Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez said on Friday that he is willing to “take care” of his relation with Spain and his “friends” King Juan Carlos and Prime Minister, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, to enhance the ties between the two countries “on equal grounds.”

Speaking to reporters, Chávez sent his message upon leaving the Madrid hotel where he is staying, as he was departing for the Moncloa Palace, the official residence of the President of the government of Spain, to meet with Rodríguez Zapatero, Efe reported.

The meeting with the Spanish Prime Minister was held before the encounter with King Juan Carlos at the Zarzuela Palace. Chávez is paying a short visit to Madrid that wraps up his tour of the Middle East, North Africa and Europe.

“It is a working and affection stopover. We stopped here for a gathering of friends. We are friends of Prime Minister Zapatero and King Juan Carlos. We want to talk about politics and economy,” Chávez said.

According to the Venezuelan president, the political, economic and social relation between Spain and Venezuela is “very important” and must be undertaken “on a basis of equality, affection and without paying attention to the bearers of lies that exist everywhere.”

He added that the agreements of Spanish companies doing business in Venezuela amount to USD 11.66 billion.

“It is a pretty large figure. We have to take care of it. Spain is a very important country for us and we have great friends here,” Chávez said. The Venezuelan leader stressed that he is not concerned about what he called “the furious media opposition” in Spain against his Bolivarian ideology.