The main point to get from all this is that carbon dioxide does not cause warming, but that warming causes an increase in carbon dioxide.
Did you get that?
It is the absolute reverse of what the globalists are propagandizing on us. And what causes the warming? Why the sun does! An inconvenient truth indeed. Who would have thunk it?
So the scam is stripped naked and Al Gore can inconveniently can go back to inventing the internet or whatever. Tell everyone you know to see this documentary so that the spell can be broken, so that we won’t have to worry about prosecution for “Global Warming-Denial” hate speech, so that a global collectivist carbon tax wealth-confiscation can averted and we can all go about our lives enjoying our SUVs again, thank you.
Time to wake up now!
PW
Powerful Documentary Trounces Man-Made Warming Hoax
Climate change is natural and has been happening since the Earth began
An astounding documentary that was broadcast in the UK last night completely trounced the man-made explanation for global warming, not with emotionally-laden propaganda or by attacking the messenger as its adherants resort to, but by presenting carefully considered and rational science.
The Great Global Warming Swindle brought together a plethora of scientists, professors, climatologists and weather experts to expose the myths about climate change that have been promulgated in order to hoodwink the world into accepting the man-made theory of global warming.
An answer to Al Gores “An inconvenient Truth”
We are being told lies damn lies and screwball statistics to support a new age swindle.
This short series of videos will tell the actual story of temperature variations and “crest fallen” it has nothing at all to do with MAN.
The Great Climate Swindle Part 1
[Youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Aetu6MQJuI]
The Great Climate Swindle Part 2
[Youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-LPN9PkLK4]
The Great Climate Swindle Part 3
[Youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ri4ZsyF2dDI]
The Great Global Warming Swindle
Research said to prove that greenhouse gases cause climate change has been condemned as a sham by scientists.
A United Nations report earlier this year said humans are very likely to be to blame for global warming and there is “virtually no doubt” it is linked to man’s use of fossil fuels.
But other climate experts say there is little scientific evidence to support the theory.
In fact global warming could be caused by increased solar activity such as a massive eruption.
Their argument will be outlined on Channel 4 this Thursday in a programme called The Great Global Warming Swindle raising major questions about some of the evidence used for global warming.
Ice core samples from Antarctica have been used as proof of how warming over the centuries has been accompanied by raised CO2 levels.
But Professor Ian Clark, an expert in palaeoclimatology from the University of Ottawa, claims that warmer periods of the Earth’s history came around 800 years before rises in carbon dioxide levels.
The programme also highlights how, after the Second World War, there was a huge surge in carbon dioxide emissions, yet global temperatures fell for four decades after 1940.
The UN report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change was published in February. At the time it was promoted as being backed by more than 2,000 of the world’s leading scientists.
But Professor Paul Reiter, of the Pasteur Institute in Paris, said it was a “sham” given that this list included the names of scientists who disagreed with its findings.
Professor Reiter, an expert in malaria, said his name was removed from an assessment only when he threatened legal action against the panel.
“That is how they make it seem that all the top scientists are agreed,” he said. “It’s not true.”
Gary Calder, a former editor of New Scientist, claims clouds and solar activity are the real reason behind climate change.
“The government’s chief scientific adviser Sir David King is supposed to be the representative of all that is good in British science, so it is disturbing he and the government are ignoring a raft of evidence against the greenhouse effect being the main driver against climate change,” he said.
Philip Stott, emeritus professor of biogeography at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London, said climate change is too complicated to be caused by just one factor, whether CO2 or clouds.
He said: “The system is too complex to say exactly what the effect of cutting back on CO2 production would be or indeed of continuing to produce CO2.
“It is ridiculous to see politicians arguing over whether they will allow the global temperature to rise by 2c or 3c.”
The documentary is likely to spark fierce criticism from the scientific establishment.
[Youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XttV2C6B8pU]
Watch “The Great Global Warming Swindle” – Full documentary: 1 hr 15 min.
RELATED
“The Great Global Warming Swindle” – Homepage on Channel 4 UK
http://www.channel4.com/science/microsites/G/great_global_warming_swindle/index.html
Aftermath News 
Does this mean i can now get some of the unfair and quite possably illegal taxes now
I found some of the arguments in the programme pretty compelling. Especially the fact that mans production of CO2 is only a tiny fraction of that produced naturally by the planet. I’ve never been convinced that climate change is a man made thing. Far from it, and now I am increasingly convinced it is a natural phenomenon.
The former editor of New Scientist was Nigel Calder, not Gary Calder.
Sorry guys…i thought exactly the same until i read this follow up article…the great greenhouse swindle was indeed a swindle itself…amazing what a bit of choice editing can do!
http://www.medialens.org/alerts/07/0313pure_propaganda_the.php
Your link is full of lies and spin. I love the part about other chemicals released between 1940-1980 that crippled the effects of the increase in greenhouse gases but are rendered ineffective now. PLEASE !! We have had major ice ages on the planet and warming cycles (something melted all that ice !) long before man began the industrial age. Man produces a minute total of this minute gas in our atmosphere. The sun is what causes these cycles and changes. All the evidence shows is that co2 increases AFTER the Earth warms. It doesn’t take much research to see that Global Warming is a scam with political motivations.
Ian Avery
I have read your articles, and i still think it is a myth, there has been no objective scientific debate , all debate is emediatly stifled by the pro lobby.
To many media jobs and scientific grants are given out for there to be any objective debate, it is now a gigantic money making industry.
As for the green fundementalists i tend to agree with Durkin.
Peter Barnes
The great global warming swindle
From: Rolf Riehm,
Tiefenthaler Straße 9 A
67310 Hettenleidelheim
Germany / 06351 – 12 45 68
To the Attention of:
Aftermath News
Dear Sirs:
I am convinced that all talk about the earthwarming is nothing but a lie!!
I have written a book about the climate change.
I do not deny that it has become warmer by about 10 Degrees Celsius in some spots on earth, such as in Greenland or in Alaska.
But I claim that carbon dioxyde has nothing to do with it!
Carbondioxyde firstly does not exist (only ridiculous 0.04 %), and secondly does not increase the temperature of the earth!!
There is a growing number of scientists who agree with me on this point!
Meanwhile there are several thousand websites in the Internet, which say the same thing as I do in my book. Just enter the following points in your Google:
–Die Klimalüge / the climate lie
–der Treibhaus effekt / the greenehouse effect
–der CO2 Schwindel / the CO2 Swindel
Also, various emissions on channel 4 in UK and on RTL (vom 11. Juni 2007 ) in Germany, appear as Videos in the Internet if you enter the above titles. You can reach them also with YouTube.
If you are interested to read my book, I ask you to send me a “real” e-mail address, to which I can reply and add an annex with my book.
Kind regards
Rolf Riehm
Please note: This book is also available in the German language.
If you are interested, you may translate it into another language! Thanks!
The book was written with word for windows 97 – 2000. But then I have filed it under the “rich text format” (rtf) because it runs more stable!
It has 150 pages and requires about two minutes for its transmission.
All of the greenhouse models which try to prove that CO2 is a major cause of global warming violate the second law of thermaldynamics. Almost all of this type of “proof” does not refer to any fundamental work of thermodynamics and radiation theory. I would refer you the the scientific document writen by two highly aclaimed German scientist entitled; “Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics.”
Come on guys its okay to be skeptical, but most of the information presented in this documentary is poor scientific data and pure propoganda. I agree that some political views may seem like an economic killer, but this is our planet we are talking about and if you read into some of the science most of the data points to human causes. Be a skeptic of inconvienant truth and the global warming swindle I like how you guys here are skeptic but some of you are also blindly believing this crap. I personally would rather error in the side of caution, that means put the Earth first instead of our selfish ways. So what we have to change our over consuming well it seems like some positive social evolution to me.
Kevin,
Yes, we only have one earth and we do need to mend our selfish ways. However, should we accomplish this by propagating myths to scare people into action? I’m deeply cynical about this greenhouse diaster stuff and the “Swindle” documentary has given me substantial reason to be so.Having said that it is not a natural conclusion to say it’s OK to continue polluting the planet. The effort for sustainability and pollution free living must be advanced but we don’t need more lies to make it happen. We need more honest debate and this has certainly been stifled by the environmental lobby. I call for honesty and balance as well as a cleaner and more sustainable world. Wishing you peace. Mike
Michael M, that is a very reasonable and rational statement you just made there. The bottom line is, we all understand that pollution of the water, the soil and the air is not good. It isn’t good for human health and it isn’t good for the health of ecosystems and individual living things. We should therefore always look for non-polluting technologies, processes and products that help human health, and the environment. That is what is at issue, not the temporary melting of glaciers which has nothing to do with human activity, and everything to do with solar activity. The bottom line is that the elites cooked up the idea of global warming back in the 70s through the Club of Rome in order to come up with a way to artificially unite the world under a global dictatorship by making humanity itself the Enemy to be depopulated (mass-murdered, sterilized, controlled etc) and to put the survivors of this genocide into a high-tech prison-planet panopticon system known as the New World Order. That is what they all admit in their own writings that they know the general public will never read.
Isn’t it bizarre that everyone is obsessed with debating CO2, global warming, the effects on the planet etc., but everyone is afraid to address the real issue.
That is, that there are too many people on the planet, the population is growing at an unsustainable rate and that people are living longer and longer.
You try persuading the ‘save the planet brigade’ to focus on people that have too many children, rather than individual consumption of CO2 – Can you imagine Al Gore releasing a movie based on that?
The only country to have addressed this most important issue is China.
Yes, China, the country that Western propaganda tells us are doing most of the damage, are the only ones attempting to limit the rate of population growth…
No discussion here, yet, about using very sophisticated computer controlled technology to heat the ionosphere in order to manipulate the jet stream in order to control the weather in order to create floods or droughts, to enhance warfighting capabilities. Oh, but, that isn’t possible, right?
http://www.technologyreview.com/news/519636/new-ipcc-report-strengthens-certain-of-climate-change/